This is NOT from Team Hillary Clinton. Apparently we are not the only ones thinking this way. I wonder how this came to be! At any rate, it is sure to go viral, so I might as well post it before 10 other people send it to me. It will end up here sooner or later. I hope Secretary Clinton is not taking any heat for any of this because she has no control over it. She is not doing it. We are. Her supporters are.
It was taken down, but now it is back!
Wow is that real that’s running?
LikeLike
I don’t know! Someone posted it on Facebook. It’s not from Hillary, but there is a groundswell starting. I am not sure (due to screen names) whether or not we “know” this person.
LikeLike
I don´t have any idea from where it´s, but I like it a lot! ♥♥
LikeLike
Me too!
LikeLike
…
One determined individual, a Chicago dentist named William DeJean, paid for ads to support former Democratic candidate and New York Sen. Hillary Clinton. “Tell the Democratic superdelegates to support Hillary Clinton. Paid for by William DeJean. Not authorized by any candidate or candidate’s committee,” the ad says.
DeJean says Clinton was treated unfairly. So he says he paid an ad company $20,000 to make a few ads and place them on TV. “You tell them what you want, and they make them up … Montana, South Dakota … I had them play 16 times in each state,” he said.
…
http://weblogs.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=91383135&ps=rs
http://fundrace.huffingtonpost.com/neighbors.php?type=city&city=Chicago
LikeLike
Thank you for in information! Apparently, Dr. DeJean is at it again! Go Hillary!!!!
LikeLike
I surely hope we are not the only ones with this dream in our heads. You would think everyone has seen enough by now to jump at such an opportunity.
LikeLike
Evidently not by a long shot!
LikeLike
Unless Obama decides not to run in 2010, I really don’t believe Hillary will run. While I love the ad, I’m not sure what will be gained by running it now.
LikeLike
You never know. If his approval is low, he might not run.
LikeLike
Since when has approval rating trumped political ego? I’m not saying it’s impossible (I think Madame secretary would do a far better job) but I’m not sure he knows what average, run of the mill democrats are thinking, let alone the rest of the population. I imagine living inside the Presidential bubble is living in a pretty rarified world.
LikeLike
True. But if the party sees that it can lose the White House, they might make a move.
LikeLike
If that happens, it’s going to be ugly. It’ll make the last democratic primary look tame. They better put Bill Clinton in a cage somewhere until it’s over because he got angry when they called her things like racist the last time around. This would be worse.
LikeLike
I’m not saying she will challenge him. This happens if he is out of the picture. That is something the party would have to do.
LikeLike
still4hill – there is not a chance in hell that this POTUS is going to *not run*. As someone said yesterday, “He thinks he’s Caesar and can accomplish miracles just by talking.” When one has that kind of narcissism, there is always grandiose views of one’s self. So we can forget him not running.
I keep hoping there is an investigation going on of the 2008 primary and all the illegalities and crimes committed to make sure B0 was the nominee. Then my dream scenario is this POTUS is impeached and removed from office and the people who interfered with an election are sent to jail!
You can also forget the present dem party leadership making any favorable decisions where Hillary is concerned. They are the reason Hillary is not POTUS today. They are in over their heads, but must carry through with their sinister plan – or look like the fools they really are.
LikeLike
Well, the miracles aren’t happening. People are noticing. If the Dems want to lose the Oval Office, they are right on course.
LikeLike
And who, I ask you, would vote for a Democrat- any Democrat – after their party is impeached? Her career along with plenty of others who are blameless would be ended in one fell swoop. I doubt she’d change parties over this and I doubt Republicans would take her if she tried – at least not as she is now. I’m not up to seeing all Democrats purged from the political sphere leaving us with Republicans and who-knows-what as our options. I know that’s not what you’re looking for, or at least I don’t think it is, but factoring in public reaction to an impeachment and all of the finger-pointing that would follow that is the likely reality.
The President is misguided, surely, but I personally don’t see him as sinister. He’s left unemployment to fester while working on other things and that is NEVER a good plan either for the nation or for elections and other political business. It’s a tragic blend of naiveté, narcissism, and a little residual shock at all the stuff one can do when they run a country. I don’t think Barack Obama is out to get me. When I think ‘sinister’, I think of secret police and people disappearing in the middle of the night never to be seen again. Perhaps my imagery is off, but I don’t see ‘sinister’ when I turn on CNN.
Nothing in this country that has been started by a small number of politicians has ever gone on too long without the consent of the people. Think of Nixon’s shenanigans. If it is as egregious as you say – I have not done the research, so I don’t know for myself – then it will eventually come to light and something will happen, but it will be public outcry, not the political theatrics of impeachment that take care of business.
Of course, I could just be a crazy, cockeyed optimist. It’s usually not my thing, but it’s possible, I guess.
LikeLike
I meant 2012……
LikeLike
This is the sort of thing heard leaking – and not from the RNC.
http://www.albanyherald.com/opinion/headlines/101697413.html
LikeLike
I think Hillary would trounce Palin because Hillary appeals to a wider segment of the population.
Just as a spectator though, I’d like to see Hillary vs. Gingrich.
That would be a fun one to watch.
LikeLike
I love the looks on both Hillary and Bill in that picture! I am considering the value of a Palin-push just to have her run against Hillary. But it would be so wrong. Wrong. So Rush-ish.
LikeLike
‘Rush-ish’ – LOL. That needs to be a word. Somebody call Merriam-Webster!
LikeLike
Whoever is leaking this kind of info does not have a clue as to why B0 won the nomination in 2008 and Hillary *supposedly* lost.
I have spent the last two years as well as all of 2008 studying and researching the primary of 2008. There are people investigating it and have found documented proof of the caucus fraud as well as the DNC and dem party leadership roles in the manipulation of the democratic party nominating process. FoxNews for one finally is investigating it. So far, it has only been on Fox & Friends weekend. Video interviews they have done are posted on Fox & Friends weekend – “Allison” (not the way she spells it), one of the weekend anchors has conducted the interviews. They surely have the evidence, but so far, they have contacted the DNC for comments on the allegations who refuses to even answer. Also, one of the 0bama campaign managers flatly denies it (video) using very lame arguments. Worth watching.
LikeLike
This is Donna’s comment from a different thread, but I thought it would be appropriate here:
LikeLike