Daily Appointments Schedule for August 12, 2010
Washington, DCAugust 12, 2010
SECRETARY OF STATE HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON:
9:15 a.m. Secretary Clinton meets with the Assistant Secretaries of the Regional Bureaus, at the Department of State.
(CLOSED PRESS COVERAGE)2:30 p.m. Secretary Clinton holds a policy discussion on Turkey, at the Department of State.
(CLOSED PRESS COVERAGE)4:30 p.m. Secretary Clinton holds a budget meeting with Deputy Secretary Lew, at the Department of State.
(CLOSED PRESS COVERAGE)
Archive for August, 2010
SECRETARY OF STATE HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON: Daily Appointments Schedule for August 12, 2010
Posted in Hillary Clinton, Hillary Rodham Clinton, Secretary of State, state department, U.S. Department of State, tagged Hillary Clinton, Hillary Rodham Clinton, Secretary of State, State Department, U.S. Department of State on August 12, 2010| 2 Comments »
Secretary Clinton’s Ramadan Message
Posted in Foreign Affairs, Foreign Policy, Hillary Clinton, Hillary Rodham Clinton, Secretary of State, state department, U.S. Department of State, tagged Hillary Clinton, Hillary Rodham Clinton, Ramadan, Secretary of State, State Department, U.S. Department of State on August 11, 2010| 18 Comments »
Ramadan Message
Hillary Rodham Clinton
Secretary of StateWashington, DCAugust 11, 2010
On behalf of the United States Department of State, I wish all Muslims around the world a happy and blessed Ramadan.
Ramadan is a time for self-reflection and sharing. American Muslims make valuable contributions to our country every day and millions will honor this month with acts of service and giving back to their communities.
Along with dozens of our Embassies, I will host an Iftar in Washington, DC, for Muslims and non-Muslims to join together and reflect on our common values, faith and the gifts of the past year. At our Iftar, we will also celebrate dozens of young American Muslims who are helping shape the future of our country with their energy and spirit. These young business and social entrepreneurs, academics, spiritual leaders, and other young Muslims around the world are leading the way to a new era of mutual respect and cooperation among all the citizens of our world.
During this month of peace and renewal, I wish the 1.5 billion Muslims around the world Ramadan Kareem.
Slideshow: Hillary Clinton’s Busy Day
Posted in Hillary Clinton, Hillary Rodham Clinton, Secretary of State, state department, U.S. Department of State, tagged Argentina, Hector Timerman, Hillary Clinton, Hillary Rodham Clinton, National Security Team, New START Treaty, Secretary of State, Situation Room, State Department, U.S. Department of State, White House on August 11, 2010| 16 Comments »
The Secretary of State spent a very busy day in Washington today, and while I shared a few of these in the posts about some of these events, I thought the readers here might enjoy seeing all of them. Her day started at 9:30 with remarks to the press regarding her efforts to obtain Congressional ratification of the New START Treaty. She then met with Argentina’s new Foreign Minister Hector Timerman (dressed to match the Argentine flag – always impressive). The videos and texts of the remarks at both of these events are in earlier posts from today. The Daily Schedule provided by the State Department Press Office did not show three meetings that she attended at the White House later in the day. There are two pictures here of the last, in the Situation Room with the National Security team. That meeting began at 5 p.m. It was a long, active day, but Mme. Secretary looked as awesome at the end as she had at the beginning – beautiful, stylish, very executive, if you know what I mean. 😀
Video: Secretary Clinton’s Remarks with Argentine Foreign Minister Hector Timerman
Posted in Hillary Clinton, Hillary Rodham Clinton, Secretary of State, state department, U.S. Department of State, tagged Argentina, Hector Timerman, Hillary Clinton, Hillary Rodham Clinton, Jacobo Timerman, Secretary of State, State Department, U.S. Department of State on August 11, 2010| 6 Comments »
Hector Timerman has an interesting background. He is the son of the late Jacobo Timerman, a journalist and author whose exposés of Argentina’s “Dirty War” led to his arrest and ultimately his exile in Israel for awhile. His book, Prisoner Without a Name, Cell Without a Number, was a best seller in the 1980s. His son, the FM mentions walking into this building to request political asylum.
I also wanted to point out, since some people fail to see my point, Mme. Secretary’s “flag-diplomacy” today. Yes, the colors of the pantsuits have a purpose! She matches the Argentine flag. It is a gesture people take very positively. She is brilliant and well as beautiful.
Remarks With Argentinean Foreign Minister Hector Timerman After Their Meeting
Hillary Rodham Clinton
Secretary of StateTreaty RoomWashington, DCAugust 11, 2010
SECRETARY CLINTON: Well, good morning.
FOREIGN MINISTER TIMERMAN: Good morning.
SECRETARY CLINTON: Well, let me first welcome the foreign minister. I’m delighted that he could find time to come for this visit so soon in his tenure as the new foreign minister. And he is a very familiar and welcome presence here in Washington, where he previously served as ambassador. He worked at that time to strengthen and deepen the bilateral relationship between our countries. And I know that in his new position as foreign minister, he and I will be working closely together.
Our two nations have a close history of cooperation and I was delighted in March to meet with President Fernandez de Kirchner and discuss a broad range of issues. And today, we built on that discussion in a very productive and constructive meeting.
I want to begin by thanking Argentina for its important contributions to peacekeeping efforts around the world, especially in Haiti. And in the wake of the terrible earthquake there, Argentina has been a vital contributor to the rebuilding and recovery efforts. Argentina and the United States cooperate closely in the fight against terrorism. Argentina, of course, has been a victim of terrorist attacks on its own soil. And we support Argentina’s pursuit of justice for those tragic and deplorable acts.
We appreciate Argentina’s leadership when it comes to nonproliferation, and Argentina will host one of the preparatory meetings for the next Nuclear Security Summit. We’ve begun to expand our relationship in the areas of science, energy, and health. And I’m pleased to announce that Argentina and the United States will host our first joint committee meeting on science cooperation in Buenos Aires this September.
And this year marks the 200th anniversary of Argentina’s path to independence, so let me, on behalf of the United States, congratulate Argentina and commit to making our relationship for the next 200 years one of cooperation, partnership, and friendship.
FOREIGN MINISTER TIMERMAN: Thank you very much, Madam. (Via interpreter) I will speak in Spanish for the Argentinean press.
First of all, I would like to express the happiness that we feel by being here in D.C., having this opportunity to meet with you, and also to have this dialogue which serves to ratify the good relationship that exists between both countries. The first time I walked into this building, it was actually to ask for political asylum, so I know the work that the U.S. has done in defense of human rights during the dictatorship in Argentina, and that is something that the people of Argentina and I myself will never forget and always appreciate.
Secretary Clinton and I then had an opportunity to discuss the situation in Latin America. We also discussed the role played by Argentina in building consensus in the region, a consensus which can serve to facilitate a peaceful end to any conflict that occurs in the region. I think that is a very important point, that it should be the region itself that should solve its own problems, any problems that arise between its sister nations. So we are pleased with the dialogue currently being held between President Santos and President Chavez, and we hope that it ends any violent situation along the border.
Also, we expressed our commitment to enhance our work in the sphere of human rights. Both countries share this very important value. We also discussed nuclear security. We in Argentina feel that proliferation is something that must be avoided. Argentina is, in fact, a leader as far as the civilian or peaceful use of nuclear energy. We also discussed issues of discrimination and the protection of human rights. We work closely with the United States and other countries on this topic, and the U.S. Administration has shown great leadership in combating discrimination and we will continue to cooperate on that issue.
Lastly, two other issues that we discussed with Secretary Clinton: One issue is a very important one of increasing the bilateral trade between both countries. Argentina is especially interested in products such as meat and lemons. As you know, Argentina has lots of products that could be used to expand and broaden trade between both countries. Lastly, we also discussed the issue of the consultative meetings which will take place at some point before the end of this year here in D.C. The U.S. and Argentina will hold the bilateral talks on a variety of topics related to our government (inaudible) we will seek to establish guidelines for our future work.
And lastly, I just want to thank the Secretary for her kindness in welcoming me here today.
SECRETARY CLINTON: Thank you so much.
MR. CROWLEY: We have time for two quick questions. First one, Claudia Jackson[1] from Bloomberg.
QUESTION: Madam Secretary, have you had a chance to speak to Mitchell about his meeting with Netanyahu? How optimistic are you that START talks will be able to start in September?
SECRETARY CLINTON: I just received a report right before coming out, and Senator Mitchell met with Prime Minister Netanyahu for about two hours today. It was a good, productive meeting. And we continue to work closely with both sides to get to direct talks as soon as possible.
MR. CROWLEY: And Melisa Cabo from Télam.
QUESTION: Hello, Minister of Foreign Relations of Argentina, Mr. Timerman. Madam Secretary, Hillary Clinton, thank you very much for giving us this opportunity. I will ask my question in Spanish if you don’t mind. (In Spanish.)
(Via interpreter) First of all, if I may, I would like to ask a question – this is for both of you regarding the conflict in Colombia and – between Colombia and Venezuela. Could you speak to the role that the countries of South America have played in achieving a peaceful resolution to this country? And as a follow-up, could you also please – both of you – comment on the role that Argentina plays in the region?
FOREIGN MINISTER TIMERMAN: (Via interpreter) Well, as you know, yesterday there was a very important meeting held between the new president of Colombia, Mr. Santos, as well as the President of Venezuela Hugo Chavez. This was held in Santa Marta, Colombia. Present at that meeting was former president of Argentina and now the chair and president of UNASUR Nestor Kirchner, and this whole work is the fruit of the labor of all the different countries of South America through UNASUR. Excuse me.
And it is our belief that dialogue is the way to achieve this. We believe in dialogue, in giving dialogue priority in working jointly, in being – accepting toward different philosophies of government and not letting that become an impediment to a solution. And of course, above all, respect for each country’s sovereignty. And we focus on peace above all as a solution. And I think the dialogue then has achieved that. As you know, even before President Santos became president, he went on a tour. He traveled to several countries, including Argentina, and he met with the president of Argentina there and that was where, in fact, the outline of this dialogue took place. And you can see the results that two days into his presidency he has held this meeting, which has achieved what we hope to be the beginning of a good relationship between both countries or the end of the bad relationship between both countries.
SECRETARY CLINTON: Well, the United States appreciates the constructive, positive role that Argentina is playing in encouraging a peaceful resolution of the issues between Colombia and Venezuela.
And we will continue to support those efforts, as I told the minister in our meeting, and hope that this outreach by President Santos and the reception by President Chavez leads to some positive resolution of the longstanding issues.
Thank you all very much.
FOREIGN MINISTER TIMERMAN: Thank you.
Video & Text: Secretary Clinton’s Remarks on the New START Ratification
Posted in Foreign Affairs, Foreign Policy, Hillary Clinton, Hillary Rodham Clinton, Secretary of State, state department, U.S. Department of the Treasury, tagged Hillary Clinton, Hillary Rodham Clinton, New START, Russia, Secretary of State, Sergei Lavrov, State Department, U.S. Department of State, U.S. Department of the Treasury on August 11, 2010| 1 Comment »
New START Treaty Ratification
Hillary Rodham Clinton
Secretary of StateRose Gottemoeller
Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Verification, Compliance, and ImplementationRichard Verma, Assistant Secretary of State for the Bureau of Legislative AffairsTreaty RoomWashington, DCAugust 11, 2010
SECRETARY CLINTON: Rose, why don’t you come up here and Rich, come on up here. They are two of the numerous people here in the State Department, the Defense Department, the Energy Department, the White House, you name it, across our government who have worked on this treaty and are now working on its ratification.
Next month, the Senate Foreign Relations Committee will bring the new START treaty one step closer to ratification. Last week, I was pleased to meet with Chairman John Kerry to discuss the committee’s schedule for consideration of the treaty on September 15th or 16th and in the full Senate soon after. The Chairman and Ranking Member Senator Lugar have constructed a good plan, and I am confident about the prospects for ratification.
In the weeks and months since the treaty was submitted to the Senate, it has earned bipartisan support from senators on both sides of the aisle as well as statesmen in and out of government from both parties. They understand that once the new START treaty is ratified and enters into force, it will advance our national security and provide stability and predictability between the world’s two leading nuclear powers.
We have worked closely with the Senate throughout this process. We welcomed senators to Geneva to observe the negotiations. The Senate has held 18 hearings, along with three classified briefings on the treaty. And in the wake of the hearings, we are providing answers to nearly 800 questions submitted for the record. There’s a lot of material for senators to review during this break, and we are working to resolve any outstanding questions they might have. We’ve already addressed several key issues, reassuring those who had had questions on such issues as missile defense or investment in our nuclear complex or verification.
This treaty will verifiably limit the strategic nuclear forces of Russia and the United States and will establish equal limits on both countries’ strategic warheads, delivery vehicles, and launchers.
This treaty will provide for inspections that the United States would not otherwise be able to hold. For 15 years, START provided us access to monitor and inspect Russia’s nuclear arsenal. START, as you know, expired last December. It, therefore, has been more than eight months since we have had inspectors on the ground in Russia. This is a critical point. Opposing ratification means opposing the inspections that provide us a vital window into Russia’s arsenal. This treaty in no way does or will constrain our ability to modernize our nuclear enterprise or develop and deploy the most effective missile defenses for the sake of our security and for our allies, friends, and partners.
With respect to our nation’s nuclear complex, Secretary of Energy Chu, the head of the National Nuclear Security Administration, Tom D’Agostino, and the directors of our nation’s three national laboratories have all testified that nothing in the treaty will affect our ability to modernize our nuclear complex and maintain a safe, secure, and effective nuclear deterrent.
In fact, President Obama’s budget request for the next fiscal year represents a 13 percent increase for weapons activities and infrastructure. Over the next decade we are asking for an $80 billion investment in our nuclear security complex. Linton Brooks, the head of President Bush’s national security complex, has applauded our budget and our commitment to nuclear modernization. Seven former commanders of the U.S. nuclear strategic planning effort have endorsed the new START treaty and recommended early approval by the U.S. Senate.
President Bush actually began this process more than two years ago with broad, bipartisan agreement that a new Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty was imperative for the peace and security of our world. The Obama Administration has followed through with painstaking negotiations to finalize an agreement that lives up to this high standard and makes concrete steps to reduce the threat of strategic arms.
This treaty is another step in the process of bilateral nuclear reductions initiated by President Reagan and supported overwhelmingly by both Republican and Democratic presidents and congresses alike. In every instance, the Senate has ratified such treaties with overwhelming bipartisan support.
The Chairman’s decision to give members of both sides of the aisle additional time to review the underlying materials, but set a committee vote for the middle of September, is a gesture of good faith and underscores the tradition of bipartisan support.
But when the Senate returns, they must act, because our national security is at risk. There is an urgency to ratify this treaty because we currently lack verification measures with Russia which only hurts our national security interests. Our ability to know and understand changes in Russia’s nuclear arsenal will erode without the treaty. As time passes, uncertainty will increase. With uncertainty comes unpredictability, which, when you’re dealing with nuclear weapons, is absolutely a problem that must be addressed. Ratifying the new START treaty will prevent that outcome.
So this month and next, I look forward to working with members of the Senate, especially Senators Kerry and Lugar, to move the treaty out of committee and on to consideration by the full Senate. We’d be happy to take your questions and I’ll have Rose and Rich respond to most of them.
Bob.
QUESTION: Thank you. Bob Burns from AP. Madam Secretary, you mentioned there’s bipartisan support for the treaty. Senator Lugar, as far as I know, is the only Republican who has publicly said he supports the treaty. I may be wrong; if you could correct that if I’m wrong? And secondly, do you believe that the holdouts thus far are basing their position on election politics rather than the merits of the treaty?
SECRETARY CLINTON: Well, Bob, I’ll let Rich respond to the first because we have indications of much more bipartisan support than that, but we’re very grateful for Senator Lugar’s public leadership. As you know, he’s an expert in this area and has really been the lodestar by which we all judge our effectiveness when it comes to dismantling nuclear weapons complexes in the former Soviet Union.
I believe that this treaty is too important and it will merit the most thoughtful and substantive response from members of the Senate. It should not be in any way caught up in election year politics. When I look back at the record of overwhelming support – 95 to nothing, 98 to 3 – I mean, just an enormous bipartisan commitment to continue arms reduction as a policy that is embraced by both sides of the aisle, I believe that the vast majority of senators will judge this treaty on the merits.
But Rich, do you want to respond?
ASSISTANT SECRETARY VERMA: Sure. We’ve had excellent communications with, I’d say, all hundred members of the Senate thus far and really constructive discussions with staff, with senators on both sides of the aisle. The hearings have been very thorough, very thoughtful. The questions have not had a partisan edge to them. They’ve been very probing. And frankly, we’ve been very pleased with the process. It gives us hope for not only the committee vote, but for action on the floor in the fall.
QUESTION: But there are additional (inaudible) who told you they will support it? Is that what you said?
ASSISTANT SECRETARY VERMA: Well, I think as we get closer, we would look forward to additional members coming out in – for support of the treaty.
SECRETARY CLINTON: Thank you.
QUESTION: (Inaudible.) Michele Kelemen with NPR. I’m wondering about the reset with Russia. I mean, has this delay at all affected the reset with Russia? And has it also affected your overall strategy on nuclear policy? I mean, are you worried about the nuclear test ban treaty now, other bigger parts of the agenda?
SECRETARY CLINTON: No. Actually, I think we’ve had a remarkable year not only in the reset of our relations with Russia, but in furthering the President’s policy towards nonproliferation and setting a very ambitious goal of moving toward a world without nuclear weapons, one that has been endorsed by leaders in our country on both sides of the aisle.
I think that the reset that we have pursued which has produced significant progress on major issues, most particularly the new START treaty, is moving forward. Our Strategic Dialogue, the binational commission that we created that Foreign Minister Lavrov and I chair, is working across our respective governments. And the Russians understand that we have a process we go through that they also now go through with their duma. We’ve stayed in close touch in sharing schedules and what we’ve been doing. And so I don’t see any affect whatsoever from our pursuit of ratification on the reset of our relations.
QUESTION: Thank you.
SECRETARY CLINTON: Thank you all.
# # #
SECRETARY OF STATE HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON: Daily Appointments Schedule for August 11, 2010
Posted in Hillary Clinton, Hillary Rodham Clinton, Secretary of State, state department, U.S. Department of State, tagged Hillary Clinton, Hillary Rodham Clinton, Secretary of State, State Department, U.S. Department of State on August 11, 2010| 10 Comments »
Daily Appointments Schedule for August 11, 2010
Washington, DC
August 11, 2010
SECRETARY OF STATE HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON:
9:30 a.m. Secretary Clinton delivers a statement on the status of the New START, at the Department of State.
(OPEN PRESS COVERAGE)
9:50 a.m. Secretary Clinton holds a bilateral meeting with Argentine Foreign Minister Hector Timerman, at the Department of State.
(JOINT PRESS AVAILABILITY FOLLOWING BILATERAL MEETING AT APPROXIMATELY 10:25 A.M.)
2:05 p.m. Secretary Clinton meets with the American Foreign Service Association 2010 Essay Winner Evaline Bai and her family, at the Department of State.
(CLOSED PRESS COVERAGE)2:15 p.m. Secretary Clinton holds a Fiscal Year 2010 budget meeting with Deputy Secretary Lew and others, at the Department of State.
(CLOSED PRESS COVERAGE)
Hillary Clinton Speaks Out For Sakineh, Gays, and Greens in Iran
Posted in Hillary Clinton, Hillary Rodham Clinton, Secretary of State, state department, U.S. Department of State, tagged Hillary Clinton, Hillary Rodham Clinton, Iran, Sakineh Mohammadi Ashtiani, Secretary of State, State Department, U.S. Department of State on August 10, 2010| 6 Comments »
Can we all now agree that it is a myth that Her Excellency Hillary Rodham Clinton does not have a signature issue? It is high time her consistency be recognized. Brava! Mme. Secretary! Brava!
Urging Iran to Respect the Fundamental Freedoms of its Citizens
Hillary Rodham Clinton
Secretary of StateWashington, DCAugust 10, 2010
The United States is deeply concerned that Iran continues to deny its citizens their civil rights and intimidate and detain those Iranians who seek to hold their government accountable and stand up for the rights of their fellow citizens.
We remain troubled by the case of Sakineh Mohammadi Ashtiani, who garnered international attention for her verdict of death by stoning. While the Iranian Government later stated she would not face execution by stoning, her fate is unclear. We are also troubled by reports that Ebrahim Hamidi, an 18-year old charged with homosexuality, faces imminent execution despite the fact that he is currently without legal representation. Neither case has proceeded with the transparency or due process enshrined in Iran’s own constitution, and their lawyer, Mohammad Mostafaei, felt that he had to flee Iran after he was questioned by authorities and his family members were detained.
We are also concerned about the fate of Iranians who are in danger of imminent execution for exercising their right to free expression after the June 2009 elections, including Jafar Kazemi, Mohammad Haj Aghaei, and Javad Lari. The United States urges the Iranian Government to halt these executions in accordance with its obligations to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and calls for the immediate release of all political prisoners and imprisoned human rights defenders.
The United States will continue to stand with people around the world who seek to exercise their universal rights and speak out in defense of human liberties.
###
The Superb Hillary Clinton
Posted in Foreign Policy, Hillary Clinton, Hillary Rodham Clinton, Secretary of State, state department, U.S. Department of State, tagged Afghanistan, Chelsea Clinton, Clinton Wedding, Hillary Clinton, Hillary Rodham Clinton, Relief Workers, Secretary of State, State Department, Taliban, U.S. Department of State on August 10, 2010| 3 Comments »
To go, over the period of a single week, from the sublime to the abominable tries the
hardiest of spirits. One weekend we were celebrating the storybook wedding of an American princess and the next mourning the senseless executions of wonderful, selfless, dedicated people trying to help unfortunate people in an unfortunate land.
The joy and the glow that we saw on last week’s lovely MOTB had faded to a grim pallor on the cheek of our beautiful Secretary of State as she delivered in person, yesterday, the words she had issued as a press release on the weekend. I
n each of these roles, she was pitch perfect. Every word, expression, movement, every nuance … perfect!
The superb Hillary Rodham Clinton provided us with just enough of a glance into the family’s private, personal celebration last weekend seeming to know that her beloved internet was burning up with curiousity: The dresses? The make-up? The hair? The guests? We got our glimpses of the glamor and were grateful .
Our Superstar SOS returned to D.C. last Tuesday and delivered superbly an important,
I would say, landmark speech in the best, and most vibrant of spirits. Comments from those who heard and/or read this speech indicated that the audience was electrified by her and by her words. The word is overused, but if you were to look in the dictionary for a definition of the word “awesome,” the picture at left should be there.
Fast-forward to this past weekend, which began quietly enough, perhaps too quietly for some of us who were already nostalgic for the romance and excitement of the weekend before until the bombshell hit. The news broke and spread like blood over the media and the internet. Ten dedicated career relief workers providing all sorts of medical care to impoverished, disadvantaged people in war-torn Afghanistan had been captured and cruelly executed. The Taliban claimed “credit.” It shocked. It hurt. It angered … infuriated! It broke our hearts. And from the moment we heard, those of us who follow the work of Hillary Rodham Clinton knew a statement would be forthcoming.
Come, it did, and as always the words were perfect. I knew, like I know the back of my hand, that our SOS was grief-stricken, heart-broken by these senseless acts. I knew she was taking this hard. With Hillary Clinton, though, the harder she takes something, the harder she comes back, and come back she did.
Yesterday, in a brief but singularly impressive, somber appearance at the State Department, she
delivered her words to the cameras with gravitas, determination, and strength. She did not shed a tear, although most assuredly she had, her voice did not tremble, her lip did not quiver. She looked into the lenses and said her piece, mesmerizing us with her presence, grace, and strength. You could see the pain in her eyes, but she struck a note and proceeded, as the leader she is, to set the tone of our appropriate response to the heinous actions of a barbaric, oppressive enemy of all decent people everywhere.
Yes, it was a week that went from the sublime to the abominable, and through it all Hillary Clinton, glamor-girl supreme last weekend, was, yesterday, the best leader I have ever seen in her life and mine.
Thank you so much, Mme. Secretary, for everything you do … for working so hard, for leading us so well, for putting your life to the side for your country, for speaking with so strong and clear a voice, for being so consistent, for enjoying what you do, and for taking the time and the pains to look so beautiful doing it all. I appreciate all of that!
(Parenthetical post script: While she was directing the troops, setting the tone, representing our stance, the [s]elected guy was “governing” in Texas as he has been doing in Michigan and sundry other parts over the past 18 months. As far as we know, there has been no statement from the White House about these murders – I would call them assassinations.)
From Team Hillary Clinton:
SECRETARY OF STATE HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON: Daily Appointments Schedule for August 10, 2010
Posted in Hillary Clinton, Hillary Rodham Clinton, Secretary of State, state department, U.S. Department of State, tagged Hillary Clinton, Hillary Rodham Clinton, Secretary of State, State Department, U.S. Department of State on August 10, 2010| 2 Comments »
Daily Appointments Schedule for August 10, 2010
Washington, DC
August 10, 2010
SECRETARY OF STATE HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON
12:30 p.m. Secretary Clinton meets with Secretary of Defense Bob Gates, at the Department of State.
(CLOSED PRESS COVERAGE)5:15 p.m. Secretary Clinton attends a meeting at the White House.
(MEDIA TO BE DETERMINED BY WHITE HOUSE)
Video & Text: Secretary Clinton’s Statement on the Relief Workers Killed in Afghanistan
Posted in Hillary Clinton, Hillary Rodham Clinton, Secretary of State, state department, U.S. Department of State, tagged Afghanistan, Hillary Clinton, Hillary Rodham Clinton, Relief Workers, Secretary of State, State Department, Taliban, U.S. Department of State on August 9, 2010| 20 Comments »
As we all expected, our Secretary of State was deeply affected by this cruel attack on kind, dedicated people who were only doing good. This actually appears to be the same statement tht was released over the weekend, but if you missed them, here are her words.
Relief Workers Killed
in AfghanistanHillary Rodham Clinton
Secretary of StateTreaty RoomWashington, DCAugust 9, 2010
Good afternoon. On Friday, Afghan police officers discovered the bodies of 10 medical aid workers who were killed in the northern Badakhshan Province. Six were Americans. The Taliban has claimed responsibility for this despicable act of wanton violence.
These men and women were in the region to deliver free medical care to impoverished Afghan villagers. They were doctors, dentists, translators, and technicians, and their mission was solely humanitarian and wholly independent from that of any government. Before their deaths, they had spent several days treating cataracts and other eye conditions in Nuristan Province. At their next stop, they planned to run a dental clinic and offer maternal and infant health care. They were unarmed. They were not being paid for their services. They had traveled to this part of Afghanistan because they wanted to help people in need. They were guests of the Afghan people.
At least two of the Americans had worked in Afghanistan for more than 30 years. They had worked under Soviet occupation. They had worked under the most difficult circumstances of internal conflict among various sectors of the country led by warlords, and they had worked under the Taliban time.
But according to the Taliban, they were stopped on a remote road, led into a forest, robbed, and killed.
We are heartbroken by the loss of these heroic, generous people. And we condemn in the strongest possible terms these vicious murders. We also condemn the Taliban’s transparent attempt to justify the unjustifiable by making false accusations about these aid workers’ activities in Afghanistan.
Terror has no religion, and these acts are rejected by people all over the world, including by countless Muslims here in our country, in Afghanistan, and everywhere else. As President Obama said in Cairo, the Quran teaches that taking one innocent life is like killing all humanity, and saving one innocent life is like saving all humanity. With these murders, the Taliban have shown us yet another example of the lengths to which they will go to advance their twisted ideology. Their cruelty is well-documented. Members of the Taliban have assassinated tribal elders, thrown acid in the face of young girls on the way to or from school, and earlier this summer, they accused a 7-year-old boy of being a spy and then hanged him.
The murdered medical volunteers, as well as the volunteers from many nations and the international coalition working to establish stability in Afghanistan, represent exactly what the Taliban stands against: a future of peace, freedom, opportunity, and openness, in which all Afghans can live and work together in safety, free from terror.
That is what the government and people of Afghanistan are working to achieve, that is what we are working to help them to achieve. As determined as the extremists are to spread their destructive view of the world, the Afghan people, along with their partners, including the United States, are determined to stop them. So as we mourn the loss of these brave aid workers, we will continue with our own efforts, and we will be inspired by their heroism, their compassion, and their love for the Afghan people.
# # #
Press Availability On Relief Workers Killed in Afghanistan
Richard Holbrooke
Special Representative for Afghanistan and PakistanTreaty RoomWashington, DCAugust 9, 2010
AMBASSADOR HOLBROOKE: Thank you, Madam Secretary. I’d be happy to take any specific questions you want.
QUESTION: How do you change the mindset of these people? I mean, there’s a lot of talk about trying to reintegrate and reconcile Taliban into society to have a one united Afghanistan with everybody working towards the future of the country. How do you change the mindset that this type of work is what the country needs and kind of build more bridges among these type of people that maybe don’t have opportunity, don’t see this way of life as the way that Afghanistan should be going?
AMBASSADOR HOLBROOKE: Elise, there’s a subtext in your question that seems to imply that this is a popular act, and I know you don’t intend that. The Afghan people want this kind of assistance. These people were particularly well-known and revered and beloved in those elements of Afghanistan that knew them.
The Secretary has just described quite clearly what they were doing there. This was an act of a small, ruthless minority, which is what the Taliban are. They do not represent the popular will in Afghanistan and every poll, every survey –I’d particularly bring your attention to the BBC/ABC/ARD poll of earlier this year – shows that their support is in the single digits. But entrenched, ruthless people have the ability to kill unarmed people who were coming back from a humanitarian mission. It’s not hard to do. It just illustrates the nature of the enemy.
But I don’t think in any way, shape, or form it shows that the people of Afghanistan support this – in fact, on the contrary. I just spoke to Ambassador Eikenberry and Ambassador Tony Wayne in Kabul and they said the shock and the reaction has been enormous on this. These were very popular people.
QUESTION: Ambassador Holbrooke, I’m wondering if you could tell us if the U.S. has any – has seen any evidence which actually backs up the Taliban claim for responsibility here? I know that in Kabul the – where the representatives for the aid group that these workers were with has said that the police are talking about bandits, there’s another group which is also possibly claiming responsibility. Why do we say now, outright, that we think the Taliban is behind this?
AMBASSADOR HOLBROOKE: Well, that’s an interesting question, and you’ll notice that the Secretary phrased it quite carefully on that score. But they took credit for it. And we now have our investigative people working with the Afghans to find out more about that. All we can say is the Taliban claimed credit for this action, which is in itself extraordinary. Let’s see what the detailed facts prove. That’s all we know.
QUESTION: Sir, how do you expect this attack to impact United Nations operations, UNAMA operations in Afghanistan, and already curtailed operations?
AMBASSADOR HOLBROOKE: I can’t speculate on that. I haven’t talked to Stefan di Mistura about it. But it’s clear that targeted assassinations, targeted murders of vulnerable civilians whether they are humanitarian workers or vulnerable government officials in exposed areas is a time-honored tactic of ruthless guerillas, insurgents, and terrorists. And that’s what we’re seeing and we all understand it.
QUESTION: Can I take you back a little south to Pakistan? How does the flood in Pakistan affect this war on terror, particularly because the Pakistan civilian government is being criticized by everyone in the country for its failure to deal with the situation and because the –
AMBASSADOR HOLBROOKE: I’m sorry – you’re asking how the flood affects the war against terror?
QUESTION: And how does the Pakistani civilian government’s failure to attend to it and the president’s absence from the country? How does it affect all these factors?
AMBASSADOR HOLBROOKE: Let me just say a word about the floods then. First of all, at least 14 million people have been affected. At least 1,400 have already died. Hundreds and hundreds of thousands of other people are inaccessible – clinging to rooftops, swept away. The rains are continuing, the great dam above Sindh is in danger. If it breaks, the situation will reach an even more catastrophic level. It’s already exceeded in the number of people affected the 2005 earthquake, but not as many people dead – of course, that was 75,000. So the order of magnitude unkilled is one way, but the number affected is another. It’s destroyed crops. It is a major international humanitarian catastrophe.
The United States has responded with – in great detail. We have led the world. We have sent helicopters from Afghanistan. Today, Ambassador Haqqani and I talked. He is contact now with the Pentagon and the White House. We’re looking for ways to give additional helicopter support immediately. Although that’s tough, too, because of the weather conditions, very dangerous. We are rushing foodstuffs out of our Food for Peace program, some of which are forward-position in Pakistan, others are in the Gulf.
I came directly to this press conference from a meeting I had with my team. We’re having daily calls involving AID, the White House, State Department, and the Pentagon. We are calling on other governments – and when I say calling, I mean, I’m specifically calling some of our key allies, not just making a general statement, to do something about it. We have the special telephone number which Secretary Clinton demonstrated last week, which if you text S-W-A-T and then punch – send it to 50555, and then press yes, you will donate $10 on your cell phone, which I’ve already done. I know the Secretary did it. I hope you’ve done it, P.J., otherwise we’ll deduct it from your next paycheck. (Laughter.) And – but not on your official State Department phone, I’m afraid. This is very serious stuff. We did this for Swat last year. But so far, we’ve not raised as much money as we did for Swat. And I’m concerned that perhaps people think that it’s just another one of the endless tragedies that Pakistan endures.
So I want to say here today that it is a major international humanitarian crisis that the world must rally to, just as we did for Pakistan and Swat last year and in the earthquake five years ago. We are in the process of extended meetings to mobilize the business community, many of whom have said to us that they’re tapped out because of what they already did for Haiti. We understand that issue because Haiti is an ongoing problem and a very important issue. But we are focused right now on doing everything we can for Pakistan. And I stress to all of you, the waters are still rising. It’s still raining. The dams are in danger. This is not – this is not over. An earthquake happens and then you start rebuilding; this thing is still developing, and it is at the top of the agenda of the Secretary of State and Raj Shah and I and our colleagues are focused on, and the Pentagon.
MR. CROWLEY: Thank you.
# # #



















































