Remarks With Estonian Foreign Minister Urmas Paet After Their Meeting
RemarksHillary Rodham Clinton
Secretary of StateTreaty RoomWashington, DCJanuary 20, 2011Vodpod videos no longer available.
Estonian FM Paet, posted with vodpod
SECRETARY CLINTON: Good morning.
FOREIGN MINISTER PAET: Good morning.
SECRETARY CLINTON: Well, it is a pleasure to welcome my colleague, Minister Paet, again to Washington. We have enjoyed many productive conversations, both in the United States as well as in Estonia and in many other locations as well.
I particularly appreciate the leadership that Estonia showed in hosting the NATO ministerial meeting in Tallinn last April and at the recent NATO summit in Lisbon – the leadership and support that Estonia gave to the new strategic concept that calls for NATO to develop its defense capabilities against growing threats such as ballistic missiles and cyber attacks.
We have a strong and unwavering commitment to engagement between our nations. It’s built on mutual respect, common security concerns, shared democratic values, and a history of cooperation from air policing in the Baltic region to development assistance in Afghanistan. The close friendship between our nations goes back many years, but it is certainly rooted in today’s world in our admiration for Estonia’s remarkable success. Despite years of occupation and depression during much of the 20th century, the Estonian people never lost sight of the free, democratic, vibrant society they hope to build for themselves.
And in the short space of 20 years since they regained their independence, that’s exactly what they’ve done. Their growth as a wired-in nation of internet voters and cyber innovators, their commitment to good governance, the rule of law, and fiscal responsibility make Estonia one of the most successful models for emerging nationhood anywhere in the world.
Once again, the minister and I covered a wide range of bilateral, regional, and global challenges. We appreciate the cooperation in helping the people of Afghanistan rebuild. We discussed the foreign minister’s recent trip to Kabul and Helmand Province. Estonian civilian experts are working with Afghanis to build healthcare facilities and train police officers. Estonian soldiers are serving shoulder-to-shoulder with American troops and our other NATO-ISAF allies. And I thank the Estonian Government and especially the Estonian people for showing their commitment to the ISAF mission with 400,000 Euros in development and humanitarian assistance this year.
Beyond Afghanistan, Estonians have expanded their role as champions of freedom, security, and humanitarian assistance and prosperity from Georgia and Moldova to Haiti and Gaza. We saw this most recently in Belarus, where Minister Paet announced Estonia will maintain its support for an open civil society and educational opportunities for students despite the hostile political environment.Estonia is also working with their Baltic and Nordic neighbors to liberalize the electricity market in the region and to promote energy independence and security. Through the Cooperative Cyber Defense Centre of Excellence in Tallinn, they have laid the groundwork for NATO’s efforts to protect our alliance and our citizens from cyber attacks. And they adopted the euro as their currency this month to expand trade and attract investors.
Now I could go on and on about Estonia, and I have enjoyed already two visits as Secretary of State to Estonia. But what I am most excited about is how closely we are working together to meet the shared challenges of the 21st century. We are grateful, Minister, for such a dependable, creative and close ally, and we look forward to the work ahead.
FOREIGN MINISTER PAET: Thank you very much, and thank you for hosting us here in Washington, and always welcome back to Estonia. Always glad to host you, once again, in Tallinn or in other nice places in Estonia.
But, well, Estonia is also very happy about our very close, open, and strong partnership with United States. Yes, I just also returned from Afghanistan, and I may say that our people on the ground in Helmand Province, also in Kabul, are very happy about direct and very close cooperation with representatives of the United States there. Our very clear and principled position about our joint mission in Afghanistan is that NATO decided together to start the mission in Afghanistan, and the reasons why NATO started with this mission, the reasons were the same for all of our allies and for us as well.
And it also means that decisions about possible withdrawal or possible changes with our mission, we also should make together because also, the environment or circumstances, when and how we can decide it, it’s also the same for all of us. So that our very clear position is that these kind of decisions we have to make together among all allies.
2014 in Afghanistan, of course, is crucial, is important – a important year. We all hope that it will be possible for 2014, that security forces and Government of Afghanistan will take over the direct responsibilities for security and development. But at the same time, of course, most important thing is the situation in Afghanistan. I mean here that Afghanistan cannot be or create any risks for other countries, and it is the most important principle for very deep and principled changes for foreign missions in Afghanistan.
Yes, our important concern is also development of new democracies in Europe, and that’s why we’re going to open next week in Estonia East – European Union’s Eastern Partnership Training Center. And of course, also United States is very welcome to participate with grants or with professors in this project.
Energy security is crucial and I’m glad that the United States has clear and strong interest, but concerns increasing the level of energy security in Europe, also in our region, to have new connections with other European countries, to have also alternatives – what concerns the resources of energy – is it nuclear energy or new possibilities to get gas, for example – so that all of this is and describes, again, the clear interest also of ours but also the clear interest of the United States.
And to sum up, then, for Estonia, it is absolutely crucial to see that the European Union – that Europe has a very strong relationship with the United States in all issues. Also, we’d like to see that in – for – in foreseeable future, we can witness new developments in European Union and NATO relationship, which is also crucial for developments of security and also other areas in Europe.
So that in this sense, I am happy, once again, to be here. I am happy to host our American friends in Estonia. And let’s move together with all the challenges and issues we still face in today’s world. Thank you.
SECRETARY CLINTON: Thank you, my friend.
FOREIGN MINISTER PAET: Thank you.
MR. TONER: We have time for just one question on each side. First is Elise Labott, CNN.
SECRETARY CLINTON: Hi, Elise.
QUESTION: Hi, Madam Secretary. Thank you. I’d like to start with the minister. Secretary Clinton spoke about your efforts in the cyber world, and we know that Estonia is a real leader in cyber security, especially since your attack several years ago. I was wondering, in the wake of WikiLeaks, what the Estonians can help the U.S. with in terms of developing an – as architecture to fend off cyber attacks?
And Madam Secretary, on the Middle East, in Lebanon, we saw that the Saudis, the Turks, and the Qataris have all abandoned efforts to help get the Lebanese Government to be stable, and some kind of mediation – they have abandoned their mediation efforts. Considering that the U.S. was relying very heavily on the Saudis and their influence, what now is the U.S. prepared to do to help these mediation efforts?
And on the Palestinian question, yesterday, a very substantial list of former officials and foreign policy heavyweights sent a letter to the Administration asking them to let this resolution at the UN on the illegality of settlements go ahead. What is the U.S. prepared to do to acknowledge the illegitimacy of settlements while not poking into Israel? Thank you.
FOREIGN MINISTER PAET: Thank you for the question. Also today, we discussed at least two very concrete issues that concerns our cooperation in cyber defense and in cyber issues. First, as you know, we have in Estonia NATO’s Cyber Defense Centre of Excellence and also the United States is going to participate directly in the work of this center with the specialists, with experts. And this kind of joint cooperation inside the NATO among all of our allies and, of course, also U.S. plays important role here. It is important to develop new possibilities, how to avoid possible new cyber attacks.
Second issue is, for example, with Belarus where electronic mail there or what has relationship with internet and free internet, free electronic mail plays crucial role. Here again, our experts of United States, of Estonia should work together, also maybe with some other countries to find the ways how to assist, how to support the free mail, free electronic mail there, internet mail in Belarus and maybe in some other countries where, unfortunately, we see problems with free world and freedom of press.
SECRETARY CLINTON: Elise, with respect to Lebanon, the United States supports the independence and sovereignty of Lebanon and believes that, ultimately, any decision will have to be made by the Lebanese people. Any mediation effort engaged in by anyone outside of Lebanon itself should be aimed at supporting the people of Lebanon and making decisions that will lead to stability and security, justice, and a commitment to bringing those who committed the murders of Prime Minister Hariri and 22 others to account. I think that over the next days you’ll see a lot of activity within Lebanon itself, and we stand ready, as do many others in the region and beyond, to be of assistance. We strongly support the ongoing work of the tribunal and believe that it is in the long-term interest of Lebanon to end impunity for political killing.
With respect to activities concerning the Israeli and Palestinian efforts that we and others support, there is a Quartet meeting of envoys going on in Jerusalem in the next day to discuss the way forward. We continue to believe strongly that the only way that there will be a resolution of the conflict and a two-state solution that will result in an independent, viable Palestinian state and security for Israel is through a negotiated settlement. Therefore, we don’t see action in the United Nations or any other forum as being helpful in bringing about that desired outcome. Our position on settlements remains as it has been. I clearly spoke out about that on many occasions, and will continue to do so. But, ultimately, the Palestinian and Israeli people have to make a decision about whether they can engage in negotiations that will result in compromise on both sides to obtain what we believe will be not just two states living side by side in peace and security, but a much better future for the children of both Israelis and Palestinians.
QUESTION: (Off-mike.)
SECRETARY CLINTON: We’re working to keep the focus where we think it needs to be, and that’s not in New York.
MR. TONER: The second question, (inaudible), Estonia media.
QUESTION: Hello, and thank you for allowing to ask a question. Madam Secretary, was Estonia’s big neighbor Russia mentioned today during the talks and how can Estonia contribute to the success of the reset policy the U.S. has with Russia? Thank you.
SECRETARY CLINTON: Thank you. Yes, I don’t know that I’ve ever had a discussion with any Estonian without Russia coming up, and that’s only understandable because of history and geography. But I appreciate the support that Estonia has given to our reset efforts, its strong and vocal support of the START Treaty which the United States Senate ratified before the end of last year and which we hope and expect the Duma to ratify very shortly.
We have a long agenda with the Russians that we are pursuing with the support of our allies and friends in NATO and in the EU. Of course, we recognize that it’s imperative for Russia to work with and cooperate on many issues from energy to diminishing the threat of any ongoing problem whether it be cyber or anything else. And we’re very forthright in raising that with both the Russians and our friends in Estonia and in Europe.
Ultimately, we believe that a more regularized, normal relationship with Russia is in the best interest of Eastern Europe, of the Baltics; that’s why we’re pleased to see a NATO-Russia summit in Lisbon. But there are many continuing challenges that have to be addressed, and we are clear-eyed and realistic about those.
Did you want to add anything?
FOREIGN MINISTER PAET: I also wondered that it’s interesting that with Americans when we meet, there are no meeting without speaking about Russians. (Laughter.) So in this instance, it’s the same. But yes, I, of course, can confirm also from our side that NATO-Russia, EU-Russia relations, if we manage to improve them to make them more pragmatic and practical, of course, it’s possible and positive. And we also are happy that also from U.S. the START agreement has been ratified. I hope that the Russians will do it in the foreseeable future, so that all these kind of steps to make Europe, to make world more stable – also what concerns security, of course – it’s also our clear interest. I agree that there are challenges there in Russia still which have their relationship also with internal developments in Russia, internal developments of rule of law and democracy in Russia.
But generally, I hope that it will be possible, step by step move closer to normal and every day’s normal relationship between NATO and Russia, between EU and Russia because it’s also our clear interest.
SECRETARY CLINTON: Thank you all very much.
FOREIGN MINISTER PAET: Thank you.
Video: Secretary Clinton’s Remarks With Estonian Foreign Minister Urmas Paet
January 20, 2011 by still4hill
YAY! we are back to her FLOTUS days of different hairstyles everyday, and long enough to do up-dos! leave the hair that length Hillary!! a little longer maybe, but DO NOT cut it! its the perfect length for you!
LikeLike
on that note. i’m sorry to say that have to criticize something…the Broach is atrocious Hillary. please never wear it again. Albright is the only one who can pull off ugly pins
LikeLike
The brooch is probably a gift from Estonia.
LikeLike
that’s no excuse 🙂
LikeLike
LOL!
LikeLike
Hmm… she had to pull off some up-do thing the morning after she attends a dinner with her husband? Either they partied the night and some of the morning away with the Chinese delegation or somebody’s got some P-C hair to hide. 😉
LikeLike
hahaha, i’d guess P-C hair. 😉 the chinese delegation did not look like the late night/party type.
LikeLike
plus, they probably try to “rest” every time they see each other since that occurrence is so rare
LikeLike
Their poor house staff. “There they go again.”
LikeLike
Hopefully Dorothy wasn´t there! 😉
LikeLike
ahahahahahahah! it would be like a mother walking in on two teenagers and being like “get the hell off my daughter!…..we need to have the talk Hillary..”
LikeLike
No, it’s worse. It’s a mother who has no doubt reached the age where she feels she can say what she wants walking in on her grown, married daughter and making teasing comments in the morning. Going to the State Department would’ve felt like an escape.
LikeLike
LOL!
Dorothy: “morning Bill. morning Hillary. you’re both after-glowing this morning”
Hillary: “mom. please learn to knock.”
Dorothy: “I shouldn’t have to knock when I’m walking into the living room”
😉 hahaha
LikeLike
Hahahaha!!!!! 😀
LikeLike
thought you’d like that 😉
LikeLike
I was waiting for you to find that, Still.
LikeLike
i was waiting for discourse to respond. i thought you’d find it comment worthy 😉
LikeLike
they probably have signals for when or when not to walk into certain rooms
LikeLike
Into major bedroom, for example. 😉
LikeLike
Yes, I’m voting P-C hair along with somebody convincing somebody else to stay a few minutes longer and cancel the hairdresser’s visit.
LikeLike
hahahaha
LikeLike
Or they just could’ve slept late. After all the evenings activities I’m sure they were exhausted. Good thing she had that hair clip. If there was any evidence that the Secretary of State and the former President had had any post state dinner fun (of a very grown up kind), Bill would never be invited to another DC function which his wife would be attending.
LikeLike
And nobody’s even mentioned the high neckline plus the scarf. Might she be hiding something?
LikeLike
OMG didn’t even think of that! “*sarcastic voice* is that a curling iron burn Mrs. Clinton?”
LikeLike
A curling iron burn while sporting an up-do? 😉
I like that jacket, so I noticed it. She’s never worn a scarf with it before. It makes you wonder.
LikeLike
😉 Hmmmmmmm…..
LikeLike
No pictures today. It still makes you wonder.
LikeLike
There have to be some days when she does meetings and gets her offices in order. She can’t always be in front of the cameras. As it is I wonder how she manages two complex speeches the day after she hit 6 countries in 4 days. Phenomenal!
LikeLike
I guess I’m just greedy. Slow news days are boring.
LikeLike
Well, it seems the residents here are eminently capable of inventing news. Creativity abounds!
LikeLike
oh ya we are totally pros at creativity!
LikeLike
Like a strange, strange blend of CNN and a romance novel.
LikeLike
Totally! I LOVE it!
LikeLike
Something that’s missing on cable news! Now that Keith Olbermann is fired, a space is created for “Your government officials tonight.”
LikeLike
No, no, no! No thank you! The Clintons are one thing because of Bill’s hound dog history, but would you want to hear speculation about the bedroom activities of the Leibermans, or the McCains, or the Pelosis, and definitely NOT the Cheneys. That’s a BAD idea.
LikeLike
Then again, it could be really funny.
LikeLike
Because you’ve deduced that I have a rather cruel sense of humor? 🙂
LikeLike
I knew you would have second thoughts!
LikeLike
Yeah, My comment got a little lost (again). It’s above the statement I was responding to.
LikeLike
I got it, nonetheless. Yeah, the humor could get a bit dark, but even purely real-life stuff could be funny. Laura Bush could just be taken straight out of her own pages. I love her. She tells W as W.
LikeLike
Well, sometimes truth is stranger than fiction.
LikeLike
Like when his dad, as ex-POTUS, went to a supermarket for the first time and didn’t know about bar codes. Barb told that one. LOL!
LikeLike
ahahahahaha I literally LOL at “Like a strange, strange blend of CNN and a romance novel.” and the idea of the other couples being talked about..particularly the cheneys…ugh thats just DISTURBING. lets stick with Hill and Bill because they’re the only ones that still seem to be in love with each other.
LikeLike
As in, given the entertainment at the state dinner, the only ones who still have a “sax” life?
LikeLike
hahaha. ya
LikeLike
“Sorry that we had to leave earlier last night. We had some “HBT” going on!”
LikeLike
Hopefully this will work.
http://www.sipausa.com/ximagi/search.php?assignment_id=28990#page=0&view=1
LikeLike
Brand new place to add replies because I think we’ll be on this topic for a while. (Regrettably? Perhaps.)
I think the Pelosis still care about each other. I think they still sleep in the same bed when they get a chance… and that’s as far as I choose to take that, thank you. The Liebermans and the McCains – I refuse to even get anywhere close to thinking about them. I think Dick Cheney probably sleeps upside down in a cave like a bat.
LikeLike
It’s slim pickins out there. Gores – broken up – they were hot stuff when they were together. Don’t really want to think about Barb and HW. Boehner – who knows? He cries so much.
Beltway sex lives might be too icky to report.
LikeLike
I really miss the Gores. I still truly hope they will reconcile because more than any other political couple ever, there was no question that they truly loved each other more than anything.
LikeLike
😕 A little too hot.
Because most of them live apart from their spouses I think it’s more like Beltway lack-of-sex lives.
LikeLike
OMG! I thought the EXACT same thing about all the couples! We must have the same wavelength or something!
Yes I think the Pelosis still care, but you never see Nancy talking about Paul the way Hillary talks about Bill. Hillary lights up when you mention his name and vice versa. I know nothing about the Liebermans, and don’t care. The McCains looked like they couldn’t even stand to be on a podium together, and the cheneys….they don’t even need to be explained.
LikeLike
Listen to Joe Lieberman speak for about thirty seconds and that’ll give you enough information.
As far as the Pelosi’s go, Nancy Pelosi gets asked about her husband less. I don’t think Hillary would volunteer any information. Also Nancy Pelosi’s political life is completely independent of her private life. As a former first lady, I don’t think that will ever be the case with Hillary.
LikeLike
True. I just saw that Joe Lieberman was on Morning Joe the other day and called Arianna Huffington ‘Sweetheart’ in the most condescending way! I couldn’t believe it! seriously!
LikeLike
Wow! Now that the shawl of running is off his shoulders the real Joe comes out! Echoes of Obama! “Sweetie!”
LikeLike
I will not miss being represented by him. So long, Joe!
LikeLike
Oh, I forgot! He was your senator! It’s hard to lose your senator, especially when you don’t know who will get the seat. Best of luck getting someone who listens. McMahon evidently still has a lot of $$$$. I don’t like her.
LikeLike
The Dems have time and CT is usually quite liberal, so I’m not too nervous. McMahon couldn’t close the deal. She lost by eleven points to the nerdiest man in the state. (Don’t get me wrong, I like Blumenthal, but he doesn’t campaign as well as he does his job.) She didn’t debate well – got visibly annoyed when challenged on issues – inundates you with junk mail, and hinted at possibly trying to lower the minimum wage. Unless Democrats really can’t get their act together, I’m not afraid of Linda McMahon, even if she does have more money than god.
LikeLike
Bombarded me too, and I don’t live in CT. I resented her last ad where she tried to be HRC. The one about the single mom. Looked to me like she was trying to recreate HRC in NH. I can’t stand her.
LikeLike
What was she trying to get you to do, call someone in CT and ask them to vote for her? Self-obsessed much?
LikeLike
We get all the tri-state campaign spots. She made me sick.
LikeLike
I was looking for pictures of the Minority Leader for a post on my blog and found this.

There has to be something between them if her husband is standing next to Cameron Diaz and his eyes are still locked on her.
LikeLike
There is now campaign to “draft Olbermann” to run for CT’s soon-to-be-vacant senate seat. Just when I thought it was safe to pay attention to state politics…
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/01/24/keith-olbermann-senator-draft-olbermann_n_813364.html
LikeLike