Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for January, 2012

Not so fast, it seems!  There IS no write in option.  At the Petition Facebook group,  however, there appears to be a way we can battle this totalitarian one-candidate ballot.

I am asking all Hillary supporters to write to the South Carolina Secretary of State demanding suspension of the ‘No Write-in Rule’ under the Equal Protection Clause of the Constitution. We are prepared to seek legal recourse if the Secretary is not responsive. If anyone can help with these legal issues, we’d be grateful.

www.scsos.com

Thank you for visiting the online office of the South Carolina Secretary of State. We are working hard to revolutionize the way you do business in South Carolina. Please let us know if you have any feedback, questions or concerns.

Let’s all do our part so that our neighbors in South Carolina can write Hillary in should they wish to!

 

Read Full Post »

Since I cannot remember which channel I was watching at the time, I cannot find the video, but on one of the morning cable news nets I saw Amy Kremer of Tea Party Express ranting, in a southern belle kind of genteel way, that Mitt Romney does not represent the party and that the Tea Party will resist having this candidate shoved down their throats as it were.  It rang a lot of chimes for me.

In 2008, commencing with the May 31 Rules and Bylaws Committee meeting on the votes from Florida and Michigan, and concluding with the most shameful spectacle of a viable candidate who had won the popular vote being walked out onto the convention floor in order to halt a completely staged  “roll call vote,”  Democrats have said the same thing.  Not all Democrats are satisfied with the 2008 candidate who is now the incumbent candidate.  The dissatisfaction was reflected in the New Hampshire primary results yesterday.  Barack Obama drew in appreciably fewer votes than Mitt Romney and Ron Paul.  He won 82% of the Democratic Primary vote there, was opposed by more than a dozen challengers,  none of whom managed to exceed the write-in vote,  which garnered a rough 10% of the total with no bankroll, public speakers, town halls, or physical presence on the ground by a declared write-in candidate.

It is time for the Democratic Party to wake up to a reality, as much as we love Hillary Clinton, and hard as she tried, she was not in 2008 and is not now able to effect unity in a party that she did not tear apart.  The task of unifying the party belonged to Barack Obama who campaigned on a claim that he would unify the entire nation.   He has accomplished neither, and the reason is that he did not heal the wound from which the country was bleeding four years ago.  He did nothing to support homeowners facing foreclosure, unemployed Americans, and students who could not afford tuition.  He responded to the BP oil disaster with paralysis, and chose to waste 18 months pushing a faulty and wanting health care bill when people were suffering from poverty and joblessness.  So, in short, placing HRC on the ballot under the name of a failing and flailing candidate will not effect his reelection.  We will not even entertain such a ridiculous idea which is put forth by those who assure us that it will not happen anyway. (So why even raise it?)

You have to love seniors.  The very experienced who have seen so much and have lived through bad times before  know what it takes to fix things.  They no longer have to worry about pinks slips.  They have faced so much in life that they do not care what they say.  Devil-may-care,  they say what is on their minds.  Here are two of them.

Specter: Dump Obama for Hillary

January 10, 2012|By Tom Infield, INQUIRER STAFF WRITER

Should President Obama dump Joe Biden as his running mate and replace him with Hillary Clinton?

Arlen Specter was asked that hot-potato question, circulating in some Democratic circles, in a meeting Tuesday with The Inquirer editorial board.

His answer showed that the former 30-year senator hasn’t lost his knack for blunt talk – nor, perhaps, his bitterness over what he feels were slights from Obama during his failed 2010 Senate campaign.

Read more >>>>

Here is another senior icon.

Another lefty celebrity says he’s heartbroken and dismayed by Obama

posted at 1:20 pm on January 11, 2012 by Tina Korbe

In a recent appearance on the “Smiley & West” radio program hosted by Tavis Smiley and Cornel West, Harry Belafonte lamented the president’s lack of a moral compass — and cautioned other discontents to be wary of the proposition that the president just needs a second term to prove himself. Said Belafonte:

Read more >>>>

I have, over the years of Obama’s tenure,  occasionally clashed with younger folks here who have been sure that older people do not “get it.”  I beg to differ.  Guys and gals old enough to be my parents have a compendium of knowledge and experience we have yet to gain.  It never hurts to listen to voices of experience.  They, after all, have little to lose at this point, and the young?  Their futures are on the line.  It might serve them well to attend to these voices and ask themselves where their values are:  in fixing what is wrong, or in continuing to prop up the failed and ineffectual candidate that thrilled them with all the texting four years ago.

It was a cheap trick, kids.  I got some of those tweets too when hurricanes ravaged the Gulf Coast.  All he wanted was for my Red Cross donations to go through his website.  Well, I know how to find the Red Cross on my own.  I did not need him to tell me how to arrive there, and he does not know how to get us back to where we need to be.  If  he did, surely he would have made his huge effort by now.

FDR did not win four elections by saying that he needed another term.  He rolled up his sleeves, showed us what was possible, and an impressed and grateful populace gladly reelected him.  No, I did not witness this history,  but I learned from it nonetheless – from folks older than I.  We all should.

Read Full Post »

Vodpod videos no longer available.

Remarks With Qatari Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Sheikh Hamad bin Jassim bin Jabor Al Thani After Their Meeting

Remarks

Hillary Rodham Clinton
Secretary of State
Treaty Room
Washington, DC
January 11, 2012

SECRETARY CLINTON: Well, welcome, everyone, and Happy New Year. And it’s especially appropriate that I would start this new year with a meeting between myself and Sheikh Hamad bin Jassim, the prime minister and foreign minister of Qatar. It’s always a great pleasure and an important opportunity for us to get together to discuss the issues that are affecting both of us, and I am delighted that we had this chance to do so.Qatar is and remains a very valuable American partner. As we look back on the year just finished, I’m not sure there was any one like it. It was an extraordinary time, and during it, our partnership evolved to address new challenges and take advantage of new opportunities, including the unprecedented joint operations with NATO over the skies of Libya.

Today, Sheikh Hamad and I had a productive and wide-ranging discussion about the path forward. We spoke about the importance of helping Libya complete its transition from an armed revolution to a peaceful, unified, and orderly democracy under the rule of law. We discussed Yemen, where Qatar is working as part of the Gulf Cooperation Council to ensure that all parties honor their commitment to take part in a peaceful transition to democracy. We also spoke about the importance of responding to people’s economic needs. So many of these revolutions and uprisings that we have seen were rooted in the economic grievances that people had – not enough jobs, not jobs that paid an adequate wage for a family, too much corruption, and so much else. And we are working together to assist countries to provide more economic change for their people.

And of course, we spoke at length about the troubling events unfolding in Syria. I want to commend Qatar and the prime minister particularly for his personal commitment and leadership to rally the Arab world to end Assad’s assault on his own people. Two weeks ago, Arab League monitors arrived in Syria to judge whether the regime was keeping its promise to end the killings, withdraw its troops, release political prisoners, and follow through on the commitments that it had made.

So far, the regime has not done so. It claims to have released some prisoners, but thousands more are still not free. Dozens more are arrested every day. We’ve seen the Syrian army paint its assault vehicles blue to disguise military forces as police to hide from the world the full extent of its crackdown. Just two days ago, 11 of the international monitors were attacked – two were injured – when their convoy came under assault.

But instead of taking responsibility, what we hear from President Assad in his chillingly cynical speech yesterday was only making excuses, blaming foreign countries, conspiracies so vast that now it includes the Syrian opposition, the international community, all international media outlets, the Arab League itself. And I want to commend the Arab League for showing real leadership. I think that it’s clear to both the prime minister and myself that the monitoring mission should not continue indefinitely. We cannot permit President Assad and his regime to have impunity. Syrians deserve a peaceful transition. We are looking to work with the Arab League when the current monitoring mission expires on January 19th. And we look again to the prime minister for his leadership.

So we talked about many things. Those are some of the highlights. But it’s, again, a pleasure to meet with you and to have this chance to exchange views, Prime Minister.

PRIME MINISTER AL THANI: Thank you very much, Madam Secretary. First of all, Happy New Year to you and to the ladies and gentlemen here. It’s my pleasure to be here again and I think the talks between us is reflecting the relationship, the strength of, and the depth of the relationship between Qatar and United States. Actually, last year was a hard year, and it seems to me this year will be a hard year in our region. As you know, there is a lot of conflicts in our region and a lot of challenges, and that need that we work as an Arab, and I am happy and glad that the Arab League have taken the lead in how to try to find a solution – not always easy, not always successful, but this is – in the history of the Arab League, this is the first time that we are sending a monitor (inaudible) people.

I could not see, up till now, a successful mission, frankly speaking. I hope it will be successful, but 19th, there will be a report, and this report will be very important for us to make the right judgment. We cannot accept to let the situation as it is in Syria and the people killed by their own governments. I think it’s the Arab responsibility, but also it’s an international responsibility in the end. We hope we solve it in – as we say, in the house of the Arabs, but right now the government not helping us. The Syrian Government’s not helping us. The killing still is – daily killing going on.

Of course, there is the Yemen challenge, which we hope that it finish as been planned. And we have the election next month in the 21st of next month. Of course, the situation and the tension in the Gulf is very important, and we’ve been discussing how we can reduce the tension in the Gulf, and respect each country’s and each jurisdiction for each of us in the region.

The other problem, of course, which it’s – also need an attention from all of us is the Palestinian-Israeli conflicts. And I think this is a very important issue, which we should find a way, especially this year. We are happy that there is kind of start between the Quartet and the Palestinian and the Israelis, but it have to have a result and the Israeli have to stop the settlements so they can allow these talks take their chances to succeed.

But I really thank you very much, Madam Secretary, for this opportunity, and I think this talk is very important for us and for the region.

MS. NULAND: We have time for two questions today. First one from CNN, Elise Labott.

QUESTION: Thank you, Sheikh Hamad. First, on the Taliban, the Taliban has announced their willingness to open an office in Qatar. Can you talk about the next steps?

And, Madam Secretary, is the U.S. ready to release these Guantanamo detainees in exchange for talks with the Taliban?

And on Iran, we’ve seen a series of provocative moves, including a threat to close the Strait of Hormuz. How would you respond to that? Are you discussing alternative oil supplies to countries who rely on Iran?

And Madam Secretary, today Iran accused the United States and Israel of killing one of its nuclear scientists. How do you respond to that?

Thank you.

SECRETARY CLINTON: Well, let me start with the Taliban office, because I want to put this in context of our larger strategy to support a peaceful, stable, increasingly prosperous and democratic Afghanistan. These are goals that both the United States and Qatar share. As I said when I was in the region last fall, our strategy includes three elements: we have to continue fighting against those who take up arms against Afghans, against NATO-ISAF; we have to talk with those willing to talk to seek a peaceful resolution; and we have to continue to try to build Afghanistan for the future.

With respect to the fight, we have supported the Government of Afghanistan now for more than 10 years. And as we move toward full Afghan transition to security, we are standing with the government and the people of Afghanistan to battle those who continue to use violent means against innocent people. And we are absolutely resolved to defend the interests of Afghanistan and the international community.

Now with respect to talking to the Taliban, the reality is we never have the luxury of negotiating for peace with our friends. If you’re sitting across a table discussing a peaceful resolution to a conflict, you are sitting across from people who, by definition, you don’t agree with and who you may previously have been across a battlefield from. So we are prepared to support an Afghan-led process of reconciliation, and we will participate in that in support of the Afghans if we believe it holds promise for an end to the conflict.

So we have worked to help establish a reconciliation process and real negotiations, and we have been very grateful for the assistance that the Government of Qatar has provided. I think the positive statements last week from both President Karzai and the Taliban demonstrate that there is support for such discussions for the political office to open in Qatar. And – now nothing has been concluded. We are still in the preliminary stages of testing whether this can be successful. And we remain committed to the red lines that we have consistently laid out, namely that both the Afghan Government and the international community must see the insurgents renounce violence, break with al-Qaida, and support the laws and constitution of Afghanistan, including protecting the rights of women and minorities.

I have made it clear to President Karzai that we will work with him under his leadership. I’ve asked our Special Representative, Ambassador Marc Grossman, to go to Afghanistan next week to continue our consultations with the Afghans, and also to go to Qatar to continue our consultations with our partners in Qatar.

And I think it’s also important to remember, at the same time we’re doing this, we’re trying to continue to build a better future for the Afghans. That’s the idea behind the vision of a New Silk Road. And we’re looking for a lot of regional partners to assist us in doing that. And we have not made any decisions about releasing any Taliban from Guantanamo.

Let me just continue and then turn it over to Sheikh Hamad, who may have to excuse himself because he’s expected at the White House.

I think it’s important to recognize very clearly that the provocative rhetoric coming out of Iran in the last week has been quite concerning. It has caused us and many of our partners in the region and around the world to reach out to the Iranians to impress upon them the provocative and dangerous nature of the threats to close the Strait of Hormuz. This is an international waterway. The United States and others are committed to keeping it open. It’s part of the lifeline that keeps oil and gas moving around the world. And it’s also important to speak as clearly as we can to the Iranians about the dangers of this kind of provocation.

Having said that, I want to categorically deny any United States involvement in any kind of act of violence inside Iran. We believe that there has to be an understanding between Iran, its neighbors, and the international community that finds a way forward for it to end its provocative behavior, end its search for nuclear weapons, and rejoin the international community and be a productive member of it.

PRIME MINISTER AL THANI: Well, Iran – I will start from Iran where the Secretary end. Iran is a very important country, very close to us and the border, and we believe that we have to find a way to live together in peaceful way. And for that, I believe that a dialogue is – and political dialogue – is very important to try to sort the problem between Iran and other international communities. But it have to be a serious talk from both sides. It have to be a productive talk with an object how to find a way to get out of this dilemma of the negotiation. But for us, it’s very important that we don’t trigger any tension, military tension, in the region. We are against any military tension. We think that the only best way is, as I mentioned, is to find a serious dialogue, not a dialogue just for a dialogue but a serious dialogue between the parties.

About the office of Taliban, as you know, Qatar is trying to be peaceful messengers or peaceful ambassadors, and we are trying to do this with all our capacity. And that’s part of our policy how to defuse the tension in our region. And Afghanistan is not far from our region, and any opportunity we can help our friends to try to find a mutual ground to start a negotiation and dialogue, we think this is the best opportunity to solve the tension in our region.

As you know, the region passed through a lot of difficulties, a lot of wars. It’s time to find a way to try to solve it. And we really thank Madam Secretary. She is very wise, doing a great job. And I’m not saying this for complimentary, but I think she – we could feel that there is a lot of problem could be solved with his – with her wise policy in the region.

Thank you very much.

SECRETARY CLINTON: Thank you, Sheikh Hamad. And I think —

QUESTION: Time for one more?

SECRETARY CLINTON: We have one more, and then I’m going to have let the sheikh go.

QUESTION: Sure.

MS. NULAND: Last question to Nadia Charters, MBC.

QUESTION: Thank you. Madam Secretary, you talked about the Arab League monitors report. Many expect it to be damning to the Syrian regime. Is the next step the UN Security Council? Will you be able to get a resolution that has teeth more than just rhetoric?

(In Arabic.)

SECRETARY CLINTON: I’m going to let Sheikh Hamad answer that after it’s translated, because we are certainly supportive of the Arab League leadership.

INTERPRETER: The question in Arabic was: Assad has launched accusations against the Arab League that it is receiving orders and taking directions from foreign parties and outside parties. So how can you answer these attacks or these verbal attacks?

PRIME MINISTER AL THANI: Shall I answer in Arabic or in English? In Arabic.

(In Arabic.)

That’s – I should say it in English. Yes, you can.

INTERPRETER: Madam Secretary?

SECRETARY CLINTON: Yes.

INTERPRETER: The foreign minister said in Arabic the following: It is important now not to look at who is launching accusations towards whom. It is important now for President Assad to cooperate with the Arab League mission and to cooperate with the Arab thoughts and ideas in order to find a resolution to this issue. He has said that the Arab League has been a six decades of failure, and there are those who also say that the regime in Syria has been four decades of stuff. Therefore, and this is something that the people of Syria and the Arab people will be judging or will judge, whether the successes and the failures.

What is most important now, it’s to stop the killing, to remove all armed presence from the streets, to release all detainees and prisoners, and to provide security for the media. And until now, we have not seen that this has been fulfilled and implemented according to the protocol that was put in place for that. We will have a meeting with the mission, with the Arab League mission, of the observers mission, on the 19th or the 20th of this month, and we will look into the assessment and assessment report that this mission will bring. And we will see whether there will be ways or venues for cooperation and how we will deal forward with that problem. However, what is now obvious today is that attacks are still ongoing and it seems that the Government of Syria is still not ready to change its course.

SECRETARY CLINTON: Thank you all very much.

PRIME MINISTER AL THANI: Thank you very much.

Read Full Post »

We lack some specifics at the moment, but CNN Politics is reporting the New Hampshire Democratic primary thus with 100% of precincts reporting.

Race
Status
Candidate
Votes
Vote %
Del*
Est. % In

New Hampshire

Updated 12:06 p.m. EST, Jan 11, 2012
County:
Table | Map
48,970
82%
0
100%
reporting
Total Write-ins
5,908
10%
0

SO!  While we do not know for whom those write-in votes were cast (we can suppose not for the baker’s dozen of challengers on the ballot),  and, oddly, we do not see a total of votes cast with a list of those challengers and their results, we do see that there was a pretty healthy write-in vote.

As a reminder, if she did garner a sizable portion of write-in votes,  HRC  never declared or said a word to imply that she was running, never set her pretty little foot on New Hampshire soil, and did not spend a red cent on this.  This was entirely a grassroots effort.  Imagine if she had assured voters that she was in this to win it.  At a time when this country is in dire need of a hero with a knowledge base and plans to counter the GOP  with its bad plans and the incumbent, who historically lacks plans going all the way back to the 2007 debates,  HRC is what she has always been since that day in 2007 when she declared, the change we need.

Read Full Post »

Public Schedule for January 11, 2012

Public Schedule

Washington, DC
January 11, 2012

 


SECRETARY HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON

9:30 a.m. Secretary Clinton meets with the senior management team, at the Department of State.
(CLOSED PRESS COVERAGE)

11:45 a.m. Secretary Clinton holds a bilateral meeting with Qatari Foreign Minister Sheikh Hamad bin Jassim bin Jabor Al Thani, at the Department of State.
(JOINT PRESS AVAILABILITY )

3:15 p.m. Secretary Clinton meets with Pakistani Ambassador-designate Sherry Rehman, at the Department of State.
(CLOSED PRESS COVERAGE)

4:30 p.m. Secretary Clinton attends a meeting at the White House.
(MEDIA DETERMINED BY WHITE HOUSE)

Read Full Post »

Vodpod videos no longer available.

Swearing-In Ceremony for Ambassador-designate to Russia Mike McFaul

Remarks

Hillary Rodham Clinton
Secretary of State
Benjamin Franklin Room
Washington, DC
January 10, 2012

SECRETARY CLINTON: Well, thank you, and welcome to the eighth floor of the State Department, the Ben Franklin Room, to this auspicious occasion, of swearing-in of Mike McFaul as our next ambassador to Russia. This is quite a turnout, Mike. I don’t know whether it’s because people are glad to see you go – (laughter) – or because they understand, as I do, what a momentous appointment this is for our country and for the Russian Federation. There could hardly be a better time for you to serve in this position, and we are thrilled to be able to make it official today.

Now, Ambassador Marshall listed some of the members of the McFaul clan who are here with us. It is a big group and it is one that demonstrates the strong family support that Mike has for his public service. I particularly want to thank his wife Donna and his sons Cole and Luke, who will be traveling with him to Moscow, and have the experience of representing our country there. (Applause.)

This is a good day for us all – for the United States, which is sending an absolutely top-notch emissary to Moscow, for our partners in Russia. And Ambassador, we’re delighted that you are here because we know that this appointment represents the kind of deeper cooperation and closer ties that President Obama stands for. And for Mike and his family, it will be an adventure.

This Administration has placed a particular emphasis on working together with Russia, one of the most complex and consequential relationships we have with any nation in the world. We have worked closely together on a range of critical issues, from nuclear nonproliferation to combating terrorism and drug trafficking to addressing the effects of climate change. Russia – as a permanent member of the UN Security Council, a member of the G-8 and the G-20, the Quartet on Middle East peace, the P-5+1 talks on Iran, the Six-Party Talks on North Korea and so on – is intimately involved with some of our most important diplomatic challenges. And our ability to work well with our Russian partners is absolutely critical to the kind of world that we want to see for Cole and Luke and for Russian and American children alike. And that’s why having a strong ambassador in Moscow is so important.

Now Mike is no stranger to Russia. He’s been building his expertise for more than a quarter century, starting when he was a university student living in what was then known as Leningrad, later as a representative of the National Democratic Institute in Moscow. He became a well-known scholar of Russia. His course on Russian politics was voted by students as one of the 10 best classes at Stanford University.

Now when President Obama convinced Mike to temporarily leave Palo Alto to serve as senior director for Russian and Eurasian Affairs at the National Security Council, he became one of the leading architects of what has been called the reset. Together with our Russian partners, we have worked to revamp our relationship to make it more effective and better suited for today’s world. We wanted to put to rest outdated practices and views of each other. We wanted to cooperate whenever and wherever possible to engage more rigorously and broadly, both with the Russian Government and the Russian people.

And I think it’s fair to say we have a lot to show for that effort. The New START Treaty, the most comprehensive arms control agreement in nearly two decades, was ratified and entered into force. The Plutonium Management and Disposition Agreement, which will transparently dispose of the equivalent of 17,000 nuclear weapons’ worth of plutonium. The 1-2-3 Agreement for Civil Nuclear Cooperation entered into force to support long-term U.S.-Russia civil nuclear cooperation. Commercial opportunities for U.S. business in Russia enhanced cooperation on important global nonproliferation goals.

Our countries became closer partners in expanding supply routes into Afghanistan. More than 1,700 flights and more than 277,000 military personnel have transited these routes, while Russia’s ground transit agreement with NATO has resulted in the shipment of more than 37,000 containers of supplies to NATO ISAF troops in Afghanistan.

The United States, with Mike’s strong leadership, supported Russia’s accession to the World Trade Organization, which will deepen its investment in the success of the global economy and in the rules of free, open, transparent and fair competition that we believe will create greater wealth for everyone.

We have worked together to prevent Iran and North Korea from acquiring nuclear weapons and to begin a new era for the people of Libya. We signed agreements on adoptions to build trust and transparency as well as on visas to make it easier for businesspeople as well as tourists to travel between our two countries.

So we’ve made new agreements, we have forged new partnerships, we’ve hit new benchmarks, we have built new ties. And Mike has been at the heart of all that work. And whenever his team hit a roadblock, he’d say, “I love this. I may be only a simple professor, but it seems to me this is a problem we can solve.”

Now of course, as you know, Mike is not only a Russia expert; he’s also one of our nation’s leading thinkers and writers on democracy. And the coming months and years will be crucial for Russian democracy. Russians from all walks of life and every corner of this great country are making their voices heard, both face to face and in cyberspace, expressing their hopes for the future. Few Americans know Russia or know democracy better than Mike McFaul. And I can think of no better representative of our values and our interest in a strong, politically vibrant, open, democratic Russia, as well as a deepening U.S.-Russian partnership.

Now, Mike’s reputation precedes him. As you may know, typically when the United States selects an ambassador, we let the host country know through what’s called a formal diplomatic note. But in Mike’s case, it went a little differently. When President Obama saw President Medvedev at the G-8 summit in Deauville in May, he simply said, “I’m planning to nominate Mike to be the next ambassador to Russia.” And President Medvedev responded immediately with a tone full of respect, “Of course. He’s a tough negotiator.” (Laughter.) And that was that.

Now really, the only downside to this appointment is that those of us here in Washington who have had the opportunity to work with Mike will miss him. And he is, as the President calls him on a regular basis, McFaul. We look forward to hearing about McFaul’s stories of pickup basketball games at Spaso House. Donna has continued advocacy on issues close to her and my heart – families, women, and children. And I’m even told there may be a few rock and roll sessions when Mike’s band mates from The Pigs – (laughter) – visit Moscow. And it’s not an agricultural issue, Ambassador. (Laughter.) I don’t think they’ll need to be quarantined with their instruments.

But it’s been a pleasure to work with him. And now, it is my honor to swear in President Obama’s choice and, by acclamation, the choice of all of us for our next ambassador. And if you will stand here with me and raise your right hand and repeat after me.

(The oath was administered.)

Read Full Post »

Vodpod videos no longer available.

Norwegian FM, posted with vodpod

Remarks With Norwegian Foreign Minister Jonas Gahr Store Before Their Meeting

Remarks

Hillary Rodham Clinton
Secretary of State
Treaty Room
Washington, DC
January 10, 2012

SECRETARY CLINTON: Good afternoon, everyone. It is such a pleasure for me to welcome in this new year the foreign minister of Norway. He and I have worked closely together on a range of issues affecting the Middle East peace process, the situation in Afghanistan, global health, and so much more.So we are looking forward to beginning the new year very strongly with a comprehensive discussion about the many areas that we are concerned about and cooperating on. So it’s a pleasure to see you here.

FOREIGN MINISTER STORE: Thank you. Likewise, it’s my first (inaudible) visit this year, and it’s really a strong start to meet in this political environment in the United States, follow domestic issues, and also touching on all those issues that we share and will be sharing (inaudible). So I thank you very much for receiving me on the new year.

SECRETARY CLINTON: Thank you. Happy New Year.

FOREIGN MINISTER STORE: Happy New Year.

SECRETARY CLINTON: Thank you all very much.

Read Full Post »

Public Schedule for January 10, 2012

Public Schedule

Washington, DC
January 9, 2012

SECRETARY HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON

7:45 a.m.  Secretary Clinton meets with Vice President Biden, at the Vice President’s residence.
(CLOSED PRESS COVERAGE)

10:00 a.m.  Secretary Clinton speaks with the staff of Mission Iraq.
(CLOSED PRESS COVERAGE)

11:00 a.m.  Secretary Clinton meets with General John Allen, Commander of the International Security Assistance Force of United States Forces-Afghanistan, at the Department of State.
(CLOSED PRESS COVERAGE)

12:15 p.m.  Secretary Clinton meets with Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta and National Security Adviser Tom Donilon, at the White House.
(MEDIA DETERMINED BY WHITE HOUSE)

2:15 p.m.  Secretary Clinton holds a bilateral meeting with Norwegian Foreign Minister Jonas Gahr Stoere, at the Department of State.
(CAMERA SPRAY PRECEDING BILATERAL MEETING)

3:15 p.m.  Secretary Clinton holds a bilateral meeting with Saudi Foreign Minister Prince Saud al Faisal, at the Department of State.
(CAMERA SPRAY PRECEDING BILATERAL MEETING)

4:00 p.m.  Secretary Clinton holds a swearing-in ceremony for Ambassador-designate to Russia Mike McFaul, at the Department of State.
(OPEN PRESS COVERAGE FOR REMARKS)

Read Full Post »

In your Democratic primary, you do have more than one choice!

Thanks to Jen, here is your sample ballot.  The last line is where you can write her in.

NH_Democratic ballot_2011

Additional information on the New Hampshire primary can be found here.

Read Full Post »

 

Public Schedule for January 9, 2012

Public Schedule

Washington, DC
January 9, 2012

SECRETARY HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON

9:20 a.m. Secretary Clinton holds a call with Mission Afghanistan, at the Department of State.
(CLOSED PRESS COVERAGE)

9:45 a.m. Secretary Clinton meets with the assistant secretaries, at the Department of State.
(CLOSED PRESS COVERAGE)

11:30 a.m. Secretary Clinton meets with Special Envoy for Middle East Peace David Hale, at the Department of State.
(CLOSED PRESS COVERAGE)

Read Full Post »

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »

%d bloggers like this: