Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for May, 2012

Vodpod videos no longer available.

Video Message for the International Disability Rights Leadership Conference

Remarks

Hillary Rodham Clinton
Secretary of State
Washington, DC
May 10, 2012

I am delighted to be able to lend my voice to this very important conference. The protection of human rights is a cornerstone of our foreign policy and a personal passion of mine.All people everywhere have the right to live productive lives, free from discrimination and with equal access to opportunities everywhere – and this includes people with disabilities. But you know, and I know, too often and in too many places, these rights are violated because of prejudice, discrimination, indifference, ignorance and inaction. Many people with disabilities are hidden and isolated by their families and communities because of fear, embarrassment and stigma. Then they can be trafficked and exploited by those who do not respect their basic humanity. They are confronted every day by physical, legal, and social barriers that limit whether they can work or go to school. This is an affront to our common humanity, but it also limits economic development, and tears at the fabric of societies.

That’s why the State Department is making the inclusion of persons with disabilities an important element of our policies and practices. Our Special Advisor for International Disability Rights is working to include the rights of all persons with disabilities across the Department’s diplomatic and programmatic initiatives. Our embassies are working around the world to protect and promote those rights as well. And we are trying to connect governments with the expertise and technical assistance they need, and empowering civil society to better advocate for persons with disabilities.

So these are some of the basic principles that unite us in our common purpose. Let us redouble our efforts to tear down those shameful walls of exclusion and to create new pathways for participation, empowerment and progress. Thank you very much.

Read Full Post »

Vodpod videos no longer available.

NY Women’s Foundation, posted with vodpod

 

Secretary Clinton Delivers the Keynote Address and Receives the Century Award at the New York Women’s Foundation Breakfast

Remarks

Hillary Rodham Clinton
Secretary of State
Marriott Marquis Hotel
New York City
May 10, 2012

MS. DISNEY: You guys can write and listen at the same time. We’re multi-taskers. I’ll just say, I have one emotion forming right now, and I can’t quite find the words for it. But it goes something like this. It goes: “Wooo!” (Laughter and applause.) Nice. We rock.

So it’s an anniversary year, and that sparks all sorts of reminiscences. Forty years ago, to go back before the New York Women’s Foundation, I was a 12-year-old, pigtailed, very feisty tomboy in Southern California. I could throw, shoot, and fight just like every boy in the neighborhood. I broke a girl’s nose in one punch. It made me a legend, but it didn’t make me any fans among the nuns at the St. Charles School. Still, my brothers and I and the neighborhood boys, we were thick as thieves. We didn’t care. We spent our summers playing baseball and basketball and football on the sidewalk until we couldn’t see anymore, it was so dark.

But no matter how much I did to prove that I was as good as they were, I was always very aware that I was always going to play by a kind of different set of rules. Their dreams didn’t have boundaries. When they scooped up a grounder at third base, they were Brooks Robinson. When they hit a jump shot from the baseline, they were Jerry West. And when we gathered in the clubhouse and had a vote, I don’t think any of us was thinking of Susan B. Anthony. I don’t believe that you can’t be it if you can’t see it. But I do think it’s a lot more difficult to soar when you have no stars to shoot for.

It wasn’t long after my tomboy days, 25 years ago, when a lot of cockamamie, crazy women got together and started something called the New York Women’s Foundation. Twenty-five years is really not a long time in the grand scheme of things. Glaciers don’t move very far in 25 years. The Grand Canyon looks pretty much the same, no matter how much it’s rained on it. And no matter how they’ve tried, scientists have still not been able to figure out the mystery of what happens to your socks in the dryer. (Laughter.)

But a lot can happen in 25 years anyway. Twenty-five years ago, we didn’t have cell phones, or those of us who had cell phones, they looked like suitcases. And you couldn’t get pictures of cats playing piano on them, no matter how long you waited. (Laughter.) A candy bar still cost a quarter, little Kimmy Kardashian had not quite figured out the video camera yet – (laughter) – and you could probably rent a pretty decent apartment for what a lot of people pay just to park their car these days.

Like ATMs and emails, the New York Women’s Foundation pretty quickly came to seem both inevitable and indispensable in just that 25 years. It was 20 years ago when I came to my first New York Women’s Foundation breakfast pregnant. Twelve days later I gave birth to a baby girl – pregnant with a brand new baby and the country pregnant with a brand new first lady.

And just as that baby grew up and turned out to be quite a spectacular human being, that first lady has turned out to be quite a series of amazing and wonderful surprises. (Applause.) I remember my first Vote For Hillary’s Husband campaign pin – (laughter) – and just as with my daughter Olivia, I wonder how it is possible that we haven’t always known Hillary. I can’t imagine there’s been another historical figure like Hillary Rodham Clinton, and I use the term historical figure very deliberately. Because let’s face it: She has evolved from a nice lady in a pink suit and headband – (laugher) –who’s smallest comment about baking cookies could create a national scandal, into the hard-charging, forceful, and skilled Secretary of State that she is today. (Applause.) I think of her as the Secretary of State that takes no prisoners, unless they’re political prisoners and they need a ride home on your plane. (Laughter.)

I’m sure we all remember the received wisdom about the First Lady Clinton being the most divisive figures in American politics. I mean, how dare she have ideas about health care, and a plan even? How dare she? And yet, I’m sure you also had the same reaction I had, which was actually listening to what she was actually saying and wondering what the heck was so divisive about all the common sense that was coming out of her mouth. (Applause.)

When First Lady Clinton took the bold step of becoming Senator Clinton, she also flew in the face of received wisdom. How could this raging, radical, scary feminist possibly win votes upstate among the conservatives? And yet she did, and won by a wider margin than the received wisdom had predicted that she would. She was our first female senator from the state of New York, and she did us proud. (Applause.) Everyone said she couldn’t work across the aisle. And within her short one-and-a-half terms, she developed a 74 percent approval rating across the state, including 50 percent of Republicans. (Applause.)

So by the time Secretary Clinton threw her hat into the ring for the presidency, the received wisdom had finally come around to the idea that is was okay to wear pantsuits – (laughter) – that she didn’t really need the headband to be less scary, and that she was unlikely to set her bra or anyone else’s bra on fire – (laughter) – or otherwise upset the delicate sensibilities of the boys in the Senate. But they did say she’d never get as far as she did. And a couple of million cracks in the glass ceiling later, I think that it’s safe to say we can stop listening to received wisdom once and for all. (Applause.)

Many of us in this room aspire to be leaders; many of us are leading very successfully now. Most of us do this because we believe in our deepest heart that it’s only when we bring women all into their full power across the range of leadership and the range of human activities throughout the world that paradigms of power will begin to shift, hopefully for the better.

Sometimes I worry that we put a little too much stock in this. I worry that candy canes will not actually rain from the skies or unicorns descend to earth and dance with us when we figure this one out. Sometimes I worry that politics is just politics, paradigms written in stone, and that women will be more changed by than perhaps they can change the calculus of power. But then I think about Hillary Rodham Clinton. I remember what it was like to grow up with dreams that bumped up against restrictions and boundaries. And I remembered that just in the last 20 years since we’ve known her, a genie has been let out of her bottle and she cannot be put back in ever again. (Applause.)

This is going to sound like a non sequitur, but just stay with me for one second. Florence Nightingale – I think we all had a little children’s book about Florence Nightingale, and she was this lovely lady with a smile on her face. And she lived in two dimensions. Did you ever know that Florence Nightingale, this image of selfless, uncritical caring, actually opposed the founding of the International Red Cross? It was her view that if you give nation-states any help by taking care of refugees and taking care of their injured, you’re just going to make it easier for them to fight war and fight war more often. So she opposed the founding of the International Red Cross, a complex, certainly controversial point of view.

Helen Keller, another woman I read and read and read about as a little girl. Never forget her spelling out, “La, la” on Annie Sullivan’s arm. Do you know that that little girl turned into a fearless campaigner for peace with a sharper, more trenchant, more persuasive critique of the military-industrial complex a full three decades before Eisenhower ever put those words together?

History is not generous to women. History barely remembers us. And when it does, it tends to do so in two dimensions only. You know how when you go to IKEA and you buy this, like, amazing bookshelf and it’s got, like, drawers and panels and glass? And then you drive around to the back and they give you this flat box? (Laughter.) That’s what history does to us. (Laughter and applause.) It makes us so much less than what we are. And that’s what it did to Helen Keller and Florence Nightingale and Amelia Earhart and Eleanor Roosevelt, and we could go on and on. But you know what? It’s not going to do that to Hillary Rodham Clinton, not if we have anything to say about it. (Applause.)

So all of this is the long way around to saying that Hillary Clinton does not need an introduction. (Laughter.) What she needs is thanking, and the best way that we can thank her is to remember all that she has been and done in the short time that we’ve known her so far. We can promise her that we will never trust received wisdom again. We promise to bring all of ourselves as women to every room that we have the chance to lead in. Thank you for taking the handcuffs off of my dream and the dreams of my daughter. Thank you for reminding us every day that we really are the best hope for the future in this world. And wherever it is you are headed from here, we have your back. (Applause.)

Ladies and gentlemen, Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton. (Applause.)

SECRETARY CLINTON: Oh my, wow. It is so great to be in New York. (Applause.) And it is wonderful to be here celebrating the 25th year of the Foundation and all that it has done for so many women and girls and for this city that all of us love. I am so grateful to you, Abigail, for those amazing words.

You may know a little bit about Abigail, and I hope you learn more, but if you have ever seen the film she did, Pray The Devil Back To Hell – (applause) – you get an idea of the passion and the commitment that she brings to the cause of empowering women and promoting peace and security for all people. I want to thank Diana Taylor for her leadership at the Foundation and for your tireless advocacy on behalf of women and girls, Diana. It is wonderful to be here with Ana and all of the staff of the Foundation. I’m pleased that I got a chance to see my friend, Speaker Chris Quinn, looking so sharp and fashionable. Not that I pay any attention to that, as you know. (Laughter.)

But the people who I am really excited to be here with are all of those sitting behind me and in front of you, because these are the women and the organizations that have really made a difference in the lives of people, some of whom we saw on this stage during the breakfast. I am so privileged to travel around the world right now as your Secretary of State, and to go – (applause) – to countries where we have the business of State to conduct – to go to official meetings, to sit across from tables, to go in and out of government buildings, parliaments, palaces, and do the best we can to promote American values and interests and promote our security.

But I try, whenever possible, to find time to meet with women who are trying to do, often under very difficult circumstances, what we celebrate here today – the work of this foundation. Because in places around the world, it’s almost unimaginable that there could be this large room of women and men who are supporting a foundation devoted to uplifting, empowering, helping, supporting, comforting women and girls as they make their journeys through life.

And so when I go somewhere, like I did last week to West Bengal in East India and had two remarkable experiences – meeting the newly elected chief minister, a woman who, on her own, started a new political party and built that political party over many years, and just successfully ousted the incumbent Communist Party that had been in office for 30, 34 years or so, and who is trying now to govern a state with 90 million people in it. And then I met with a group of women – mostly Indian, some American – who, along with some of the men who were running organizations to rescue girls from having been trafficked into prostitution – and I met some of the girls and the young women, and their stories sounded remarkably like the ones we heard this morning. And in particular, the very last line of one of our last presenters that change takes time and love makes the difference.

So when I – (applause) – was introduced to a young girl, probably about 10, who had, with her mother, been rescued from a brothel, who was dressed in her karate outfit and she asked me, “Do you want to see me do karate — ” (laughter) – I said, “I really do.” (Laughter.) And she proceeded to perform a karate move. But it wasn’t so much the karate as it was the way she stood so straight, looked me in the eye, had a sense of pride and accomplishment about her. And that’s what we saw on this stage here, so many thousands of miles away.

The work that the foundation does is part of this remarkable combination of actors and institutions that we sometimes take for granted in New York and in our country. Many years ago, I talked about society really being a three-legged stool: You need an accountable, responsible government; you need an effective job-creating, prosperity-increasing private sector; and you need an active, dynamic civil society. And the civil society really fills the space that most of us live in every day – family and friendships and faith and volunteerism and all the community efforts that we are celebrating here today.

So I’m especially proud when I see what has been done in just 25 years, which is a blink of an eye in any historical sense, but I’m even prouder of what it represents and says about us as active, engaged, caring people who use our skills, our resources, to try to give back. And sometimes it is hard to see the changes. Maybe it is incremental, maybe it’s glacial, or maybe it’s like the Grand Canyon, but the cumulative effect makes such a difference. Those individual lives that are touched because of the outreach that your contributions make possible are irreplaceable. Even though we are living in a world of virtual reality, nothing substitutes for personal relationships. Nothing can replace that caring from one person passed on to another and another and another.

I learned this lesson very early from my mother, and since we are approaching Mother’s Day, I’ve been thinking about her a lot, since I lost her last November. And I was always struck at how despite a life that was much more difficult than anything I’ve ever experienced – abandonment and abuse and just really unfortunate kinds of early experiences – my mother had a resilience and a commitment to her family that she worked hard on every single day. And I often wondered – how did that happen? How could it be that you would be abandoned by your young parents and given responsibility at the age of eight to get on a train in Chicago with your six-year-old sister and take her all by yourselves to California to live with your paternal grandparents? How do you emerge from that emotional turmoil, that vacuum that still today too many children are placed into?

And when I got old enough to understand I remember asking my mother – how did you do this? How did you really survive without being paralyzed or embittered, being able to find from somewhere within the love that you shared and gave to others? And I’ll never forget what she said. She said at critical points in my life somebody showed me kindness; somebody gave me help. (Applause.)

Sometimes it would seem so small, but it would mean so much – the teacher in elementary school who would notice that she never had money to buy milk, who every day would buy two cartons of milk and then say to my mother, “Dorothy, I can’t drink this other carton of milk. Would you like it?” Or the woman who gave her a job in her house when my mother was 13 or 14 because she had to leave her grandparents’ home, and so she went to work as a full-time babysitter. But the deal was that if she got the children up and ready to go to school, then she could still go to high school, and so that’s what she did. And then the woman of this house where she lived would notice that she had only one blouse that she had to wash every day. All of a sudden, the woman would say, “Dorothy, I can’t fit into this blouse anymore and I’d hate to throw it away. Would you like it?”

Now, we think of those things as the kind of just personal connection and kindnesses that we take for granted. And in a time back in the 1920s when there weren’t a lot of formal organizations doing this kind of work, that’s what really mattered. Well, certainly today we still are primarily dependent upon individuals and institutions that are conveying the same level of kindness and caring.

And not all of us will be able to do what the groups behind us do every day, but all of us can support them and all of us can perhaps find a moment in every day when a kind word can make a difference, when a supportive pat on the shoulder can really speak volumes. Because in today’s world, which is so complex, so stressful, people need each other more than ever. (Applause.)

And so for me, it is a great delight to be back in the city I love. It’s wonderful to see all of you here supporting the foundation. It would even be more exciting if everybody just dug a little deeper before you left or when you get home. But your being here is in the best tradition of American caring. A lot of places in the world are just learning about volunteerism. They’re just beginning to create and support what are called NGOs, nongovernmental organizations. They’re finally understanding the government can’t do everything to help people have an easier way through life, to help pick them up when they, like all of us, inevitably fall. And business can’t either, given the pressures that we face in the global economy. So this space for civil society is growing everywhere, but it is here in America and in New York that we have demonstrated over so many years what a difference it makes.

So I am thrilled to be with you. I am proud to have this fabulous walking stick – (laughter) – which I will try to put to good use – (laughter) – either leaning on it or wielding it for whatever is the better purpose. (Laughter and applause.) But I mostly was looking forward to coming to take an excuse to actually be in my own country for a change (laughter), to encourage you and to be encouraged by you, to get reenergized for the work that lies ahead, and to express on behalf of my mother great gratitude for reaching out that hand, for providing that support, that safe place, and for giving hope and love to so many who need it. Thank you all very much. (Applause.)

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

Read Full Post »

Public Schedule for May 10, 2012

Washington, DC
May 10, 2012

SECRETARY HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON

8:15 a.m. Secretary Clinton delivers the keynote address and receives the Century Award at the New York Women’s Foundation breakfast, at the Marriott Marquis Hotel, New York City.

Read Full Post »

Vodpod videos no longer available.

Remarks With Crown Prince of Bahrain Sheikh Salman bin Hamad bin Isa Al-Khalifa Before Their Meeting

Remarks

Hillary Rodham Clinton
Secretary of State
Treaty Room
Washington, DC
May 9, 2012

SECRETARY CLINTON: Good afternoon. I am delighted to welcome His Royal Highness here to the State Department. Bahrain is a valued ally of the United States. We partner on many important issues of mutual concern to each of our nations and to the regional and global concerns as well. I’m looking forward to a chance to talk over with His Royal Highness a number of the issues both internally and externally that Bahrain is dealing with and have some better understanding of the ongoing efforts that the Government of Bahrain is undertaking.So again, Your Royal Highness, welcome to the United States.

CROWN PRINCE AL-KHALIFA: Thank you so much.

SECRETARY CLINTON: Thank you, sir.

CROWN PRINCE AL-KHALIFA: Madam Secretary, we’d just like to thank the Secretary for receiving myself and my delegation today. I am here to discuss, as she so eloquently put it, the continuing development in my country and to reiterate our support for the reform process that we have initiated in Bahrain. We are living in challenging times and I think we are concerned with the outcomes. We are concerned with helping the people of Bahrain overcome a very difficult year, and I am – I, alongside many others, will be doing our best to make sure that that happens.

SECRETARY CLINTON: Thank you, sir.

CROWN PRINCE AL-KHALIFA: Thank you.

SECRETARY CLINTON: Thank you.

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

Read Full Post »

Interview With Michele Kelemen of NPR

Interview

Hillary Rodham Clinton
Secretary of State
New Delhi, India
May 8, 2012

QUESTION: It’s been quite a trip.

SECRETARY CLINTON: Yes, yes it has.

QUESTION: And if you don’t mind, I want to kind of go back to the beginning and talk about the situation with the Chinese dissident Chen Guangcheng. How soon do you expect him to be able to be in the United States?

SECRETARY CLINTON: Well, Michele, he is still in the hospital receiving medical treatment, some of which was discovered to being necessary by our Embassy doctors. We remain in close contact with him. He has been meeting with the Chinese Government to prepare the necessary arrangements to be able to come to the United States to pursue his studies. And on our end, we’ve gone to the point of getting all of our arrangements finished. So I think we’re certainly making progress, but I’m not going to put any timeline on it.

QUESTION: You and your staff took a lot of heat back in Washington for how you handled it, but you also seem to have taken a lot of risks for him. And I wonder if you can tell us a little bit about what it was like talking to the Chinese, first, about when he wanted to stay in the country and live a normal life, and then going back to them and asking them when he changed his mind and said he wanted to come to the U.S.

SECRETARY CLINTON: Well, Michele, I know you’ll understand my reticence to go into any retrospectives until we finally welcome Mr. Chen to the United States. I want to see him safely arrive and begin his studies, and I think there’ll be plenty of time to talk about the details. But I’m very proud of the extraordinary professionalism and commitment of our diplomats, both in Washington and Beijing.

QUESTION: And do you see a shift in how the Chinese are approaching this issue?

SECRETARY CLINTON: I’m not going to comment on what the Chinese are doing. I think it’s clear from our following this closely and from Mr. Chen himself that they are pursuing the necessary actions in order to give him the documents that he requires.

QUESTION: And how worried are you about a run on U.S. – the U.S. Embassy?

SECRETARY CLINTON: This was an extraordinary case under exceptional circumstances, and I do not anticipate anything like this in the future.

QUESTION: I noticed in public, in China, when you talked about human rights issues, it was – you talked about it, but in a very measured sort of way, whereas when we were in Bangladesh, you were much more forceful and specific about disappearances of opposition figures, murder of a labor activist. Why the difference in tone? Is there a different way of dealing with these issues?

SECRETARY CLINTON: Well, the issues are the same no matter where they are in the world and we raise them no matter where they are happening. But I’ve been engaged in an intensive, ongoing dialogue with the Chinese on human rights and every other issue that is of significance to us both for the entire time of my tenure as Secretary of State, but actually going back to 1995. I’ve been to China numerous times. This is only the second time I’ve been to Bangladesh; I don’t have the opportunity to engage on a regular basis with either their government or their people. And so certainly, the need to cover a lot of ground very quickly during the visit there, I think is an apparent and necessary reaction.

Also, we raise all of these issues through our embassies, through other high officials of the United States, going to countries on a regular basis, through our annual human rights report. So I don’t think it’s anything other than this is a constant part of our dialogue. In some cases, it’s perhaps viewed as more intense than others, but the commitment remains the same.

QUESTION: And what are you telling the Chinese now about the future for Chen’s family, the network of people that have supported him?

SECRETARY CLINTON: I’m not going to go into those conversations. I – let’s take this one day at a time, and we hope to be welcoming Mr. Chen to the United States to pursue the studies that he wishes to do.

QUESTION: When you were in China, you talked about how an established power like the U.S. is working with this rising power of China; the same is true here in India. But here, you have a democracy, more of a natural partner for the U.S., yet India still doesn’t see eye to eye with the U.S. on some of its policies, like Syria or Iran. How are you working through that with them on this trip?

SECRETARY CLINTON: Well, I don’t know any two nations that see eye to eye on everything, whether they’re democracies or authoritarian. And part of diplomacy – part of what I do all day, every day – is working with counterparts to try to make progress in areas where we agree, try to narrow the areas of disagreement, and bridge them in some way. And India is the largest democracy in the world. It is, by its own self description, contentious, argumentative, dynamic, and they have to balance out 1.3 billion opinions, because people actually get to vote and they get their voices heard and they have a very strong tradition of engagement domestically. So I’m not surprised that there would be debates within their society and political system just like there are within ours.

QUESTION: But do you feel like you made some progress with them on, for instance, the issue of Iran?

SECRETARY CLINTON: Well, as I just said in a press conference, they have certainly made progress in reducing their imports of crude oil from Iran. Their refineries are cutting back. And they share our goal. Their goal is our goal, which is to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons. And I’m convinced that Iran never would have come to the table for the serious negotiations that we are pursuing within the P-5+1 context had it not been for the tough sanctions.

On the other hand, if you’re an Indian politician or an Indian business owner or an Indian citizen, who is desperate to lift hundreds of millions of people out of poverty and get them electricity and keep the lights on, this is a hard decision for them because they have been historically looking to Iran for a significant percentage of their oil.

So I always try to put myself in the other person’s shoes and say okay, if – we don’t get oil from Iran, so it’s no skin off our nose as Americans. We want everybody to come together and try to convince Iran to make the right decision. Some countries in Europe that were very dependent upon Iranian oil have found substitutes. Japan has made significant progress, and India is working toward that too, looking for affordable, reliable supplies. But you have to understand where other countries are coming from, and the point that I have made, not just to the Indians but to many other countries, is the United States is leading an international effort to prevent Iran from getting a nuclear weapon or prevent its potential nuclear weaponization from being the cause of conflict, which would be really bad for anybody who gets any oil from the Middle East. So you have to balance all of that. And it’s a calculus that countries make, kind of like people.

QUESTION: Does India have any sort of role to play in passing messages to Iran —

SECRETARY CLINTON: Absolutely. And we know they have. I mean, we’ve asked them to; they have been conveying their concern about Iran’s behavior. They just had Iranian agents try to kill an Israeli diplomat – kind of reminiscent of what we’ve discovered when Iranians were trying to kill the ambassador from Saudi Arabia to Washington. So they – they’re investigating that crime. They have put themselves on the line to get Iran back into the P-5+1. They have made it very clear, publicly and privately, that Iran is not in any way entitled to a nuclear weapon. So they’re very much on the same page we are and they are working through this very difficult issue regarding oil. They’re making progress.

QUESTION: This trip seemed pretty hard on your staff. (Laughter.)

SECRETARY CLINTON: Yes, I’ve noticed.

QUESTION: Was it tough on you or is this – are these trips just routine for you at this point?

SECRETARY CLINTON: Well, I have the most amazing, dedicated staff. I hope they’re not listening because I don’t want it to go to their heads, but they literally work around the clock. And while I’m out there at a press conference or making a speech, they’re busily trying to figure out what’s happening, what’s about to happen, and what we could do about it. They work hard on every trip. This was probably a little higher visibility than some of the trips, but – maybe right up there with others. But we’re out there doing the best we can every day to further American values and protect our security and make it clear that American leadership is alive and well.

QUESTION: Are you going to miss this?

SECRETARY CLINTON: Sure. I’m going to miss a lot of it because it’s an incredible rush to represent the United States of America – walk down that stair from the plane, get into those meetings, do the hard negotiatings that we have to do on a lot of important issues. It’s been the most extraordinary experience and privilege that I could ever imagine. But it’s, in my view, time to move on.

QUESTION: Thank you very much for your time.

SECRETARY CLINTON: Thank you. Good to talk to you.

Read Full Post »

Interview With Indira Lakshmanan of Bloomberg Radio

Interview

Hillary Rodham Clinton
Secretary of State
Taj Palace Hotel
New Delhi, India
May 8, 2012

QUESTION: Thank you so much, Secretary Clinton, for being with Bloomberg Radio today. We really appreciate it.

SECRETARY CLINTON: Thank you very much, Indira.

QUESTION: I wanted to start out by asking you, last week in China you were involved in a roller coaster ride of backstage negotiations over a blind legal activist, Chen Guangcheng. Take us behind the scenes. Did your talks reach the highest levels of China’s government, and what leverage did you have to convince President Hu Jintao to let a dissident leave for the U.S.?

SECRETARY CLINTON: Well, India, I’m not, at this point, going to be able to go into the details. Right now I’m focused on the here and now, which is, briefly stated, Mr. Chen remains in the hospital obtaining medical treatment, some of which was suggested as being necessary based on examinations that our doctors at the Embassy gave him. We remain in close contact with him. He is meeting with Chinese authorities in order to pursue the necessary steps to be able to leave to pursue his studies in the United States. And we’re also on our end expediting and making all the necessary preparations.

So my goal is to welcome him to the United States to pursue his studies. There’ll be plenty of time in the future for him and others to discuss how we got to the point where we are today.

QUESTION: So you think it’ll be a matter of weeks that he’ll be in the U.S.?

SECRETARY CLINTON: I’m not going to put any timeline on it, because we’re all working very hard. There are a lot of people engaged in both the Chinese and the American governments.

QUESTION: Let’s step back. This was an unusual case. Mr. Chen escaped from house arrest and later was picked up by a U.S. Embassy car that was chased and almost had to abort its mission. Was it you or President Obama who authorized this plan, and do you worry that it might spark a run on U.S. embassies in China and beyond?

SECRETARY CLINTON: Well, first this was an exceptional case with extraordinary circumstances, and I do not anticipate seeing any case like this again. But I am not going to discuss any of the details at this time. There’ll be an opportune moment to do so –

QUESTION: You certainly must have authorized it, or I can’t imagine the Embassy would have done it without you.

SECRETARY CLINTON: Well, we’ll let your statement stand. (Laughter.)

QUESTION: All right. Human rights have been a defining issue of your career. Would you have left China if this case had not been resolved? And did you indicate to the Chinese that you couldn’t leave without a deal?

SECRETARY CLINTON: Well, I’m not going to answer a hypothetical, because thankfully it was resolved. And we actually resolved it twice, but the second resolution was acceptable to Mr. Chen, who, as I said repeatedly, we were working hard to honor both his choices and our values.

QUESTION: What assurances have the Chinese demanded that this case not be repeated? And are you amazed that China even agreed to a second deal after the first one fell through?

SECRETARY CLINTON: Well, I’m not going to characterize our negotiations or any decisions that were made, but I would just underscore that we really have stated clearly that this is an extraordinary case with exceptional circumstances. And it is not something that either we or anyone anticipates occurring again.

QUESTION: What’s different in U.S.-China relations that China actually agreed to this deal? Could you even have imagined something like this being negotiated a couple of years ago?

SECRETARY CLINTON: Well, without really commenting on any understandings that were reached, I will say that the intensive work that I have been doing along with our American team through the mechanism of the Strategic and Economic Dialogues, plus all of the interim meetings and consultations that we have established over the last three and a half years, created a level of personal relationships and understanding between individuals and our government institutions that is absolutely critical for us to be able to discuss the full range of challenges we both face.

As I’ve said, and it was interesting because every high-level Chinese official I met repeated back to me from a speech that I gave at the U.S. Institute of Peace in Washington that what we are trying to do – the United States and China – is unprecedented in world history. We’re trying to find a way for an established power and a rising power to coexist. The United States is going to remain a power, the predominant power economically, politically, militarily, for a long time to come, as far as I can imagine. We recognize that China is a rising power. There will not always be a convergence of our interests or even our perceptions about what is happening in the world. So how we manage this relationship is absolutely critical to peace, security, prosperity, individual freedoms – you name it. And therefore I have invested a lot and argued strongly for combining what were dialogues and meetings on the economic side with disparate dialogues and meetings on the strategic side under an overarching umbrella. Because we have to be working across our governments and we need to be sure that no issue predominates or undermines the potential for reaching agreement on other equally important issues.

QUESTION: I need to switch to South Asia. U.S.-Pakistan talks are stalled over reopening supply lines to Afghanistan and allowing drone strikes. Why is the U.S. ambassador to Pakistan leaving early at such a critical time, and can the U.S. continue counter-terror operations and achieve peace with the Taliban as U.S. troops draw down from Afghanistan even if Pakistan is unwilling to help?

SECRETARY CLINTON: Well, I don’t, as a matter of course, comment on personnel matters. But I will say that the ambassador has served ably and well under very difficult circumstances. And it’s not unusual in these very difficult assignments that we have now – Afghanistan, before that Iraq, Pakistan, others – that the intensity of the work that is required, it leads someone to say I’m going full out for two years and then I am going to need to step off this fast track. So I’m very understanding of that. It was totally his request, and we’re going to honor it.

QUESTION: So the U.S.-Pakistani negotiations which continue over GLOCs and drone strikes, how do you see those playing out and the U.S. getting the vital cooperation it needs? What if Pakistan says no dice? Can we still continue doing what we need to do?

SECRETARY CLINTON: Well, we’ve made clear what our redlines are, and we stand ready to negotiate over areas of concern between Pakistan and the United States. They’ve had, as you know, some difficult political issues. We’ve waited patiently for them to be resolved. There are still some outstanding ones, apparently, that have not yet been so. But we have negotiations from our Embassy and teams going over on a regular basis.

QUESTION: Do you see any breakthrough now?

SECRETARY CLINTON: I think it’s a matter of continuing to persevere.

QUESTION: Here in India you’ve been talking about a range of strategic issues, including cooperation on Iran. Now, Indian Government officials have told me that they are cutting orders for Iranian crude by 20 percent this fiscal year. Did Indian leaders pledge the same specific cuts to you, and will that be enough to win them an exemption from U.S. sanctions?

SECRETARY CLINTON: Well, we are aware that refineries have cut their orders and the actual purchases have been reduced. So we’re encouraged by what India has done. I’m sending my energy coordinator, Ambassador Carlos Pascual, with a team of experts here to India next week, and they will be discussing the full range of energy issues. Because I fully appreciate the Indian Government’s concerns about fueling their economy. They still have an enormous amount of work to do. They still have to extend electricity. They still have to keep it going at affordable and predictable rates. They have a lot of economic challenges they have to address.

So I think what they are doing is certainly noteworthy. We think they can do more, but we think it’s only fair that we sit down and discuss with them how they can meet their legitimate energy needs while supporting the international consensus of which they are part to end Iran’s nuclear weapons program.

QUESTION: Last question on today’s news, the terror plot that has been exposed. When did you know about that, and how does this fit into your view of the continuing U.S. counterterrorism efforts. You mentioned al-Zawahiri, you believe, is hiding in Pakistan. So is that – explain how this fits into U.S. efforts to continue fighting terrorism (inaudible).

SECRETARY CLINTON: Well, I mean, I’ve known about this for some time. I’ve certainly known about the efforts to do something like it even longer. So I’ve been someone who’s followed it closely. Look, I mean, you’re dealing with such evil, perverse human beings, who sit around plotting about ways for people to kill themselves and kill others at the same time. I mean, it is so sick, Indira, truly.

And yet we have to remain vigilant and attentive and quick and agile in our response, which thankfully we continue to be, and working closely with the countries that I visited this week. Counterterrorism is always on the agenda because we have to defeat those who would use this tactic that is just designed to sow death and destruction. It’s not a political agenda really. It’s not intended to provide anybody with a better life. It’s a terrible vestige of an attitude that somehow violence is a substitute for participating in a legitimate political process.

QUESTION: So we can expect a strike on al-Zawahiri next?

SECRETARY CLINTON: Well, I was very sad to see the video produced by al-Qaida of Mr. Weinstein, who was kidnapped, is being held by al-Qaida in Pakistan, we believe in the tribal areas. He was living in Lahore, Pakistan, from which he was abducted. He was there doing development work to help the poor people of Pakistan, and it’s just tragic. But since Zawahiri inherited the mantle of leadership from bin Ladin and we continue to believe he’s in Pakistan, we are going to pursue him and all those who threaten Americans and our friends and allies.

QUESTION: Secretary Clinton, thank you so much for your time.

SECRETARY CLINTON: Thank you, Indira. Good to see you.

Read Full Post »

Public Schedule for May 9, 2012

Public Schedule

Washington, DC
May 9, 2012

SECRETARY HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON

2:10 p.m. Secretary Clinton joins President Obama’s meeting with NATO Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen, at the White House.
(MEDIA DETERMINED BY WHITE HOUSE)

3:00 p.m. Secretary Clinton holds a bilateral meeting with Crown Prince of Bahrain Sheikh Salman bin Hamad bin Isa Al-Khalifa, at the Department of State.
(CAMERA SPRAY PRECEDING BILATERAL MEETING)

4:45 p.m. Secretary Clinton attends a meeting at the White House.
(MEDIA DETERMINED BY WHITE HOUSE)

Read Full Post »

Secretary Clinton Meets With Embassy Staff and Their Families

Remarks

Hillary Rodham Clinton
Secretary of State
Ambassador’s Residence
New Delhi, India
May 8, 2012

Thank you. It is wonderful to be back here at Roosevelt House. And I know that the ambassador was being absolutely accurate when she talked about the stellar team that she inherited upon her arrival here three weeks ago. But I’m also confident that under her excellent leadership this team will be doing even more to merit the kind of reputation that you deservedly have. The high bar that Ambassador Burleigh set will be certainly met or exceed by the high bar that Ambassador Powell sets. Now, I think this is reflected in what some of you might have seen on the dance floor when I think Peter and Nancy certainly demonstrated diplomacy in action. (Laughter.)

I also want to recognize your excellent DCM. Where is he? There he is. Thank you so much, DCM Lu. He makes Embassy Delhi a special place to be with themed New Year’s Eve parties, summer movie nights, and I’m told killer Don Draper impressions. (Laughter.)

But for me, coming back here after my very first visit 17 years ago is really extraordinarily poignant. This is such an important relationship. Managing the ties between our two giant, contentious democracies can seem a little unwieldy at times, but you are doing a superb job. Thank you for your work. You’ve been preparing for the Strategic Dialogue. You’ve also maintained over 20 of our ongoing dialogues between our two governments, involving every agency here at post. That takes a lot of teamwork and coordination. It can be difficult at an embassy this big, but it’s really paying off. We have helped to focus and coordinate all of our many government-to-government, people-to-people initiatives.

I also thank you for your community outreach and the community work that you are doing. I appreciate the extraordinary councilor work. This is the most challenging of your work because so many Indians want to come to the United States, particular visas, particular times. We have 100,000 students currently from India studying in the United States. And you have all balanced and managed this beautifully.

So I appreciate greatly everything that you do every single day, and I especially am grateful for the extra work that goes into a visit like this, especially one that includes two cities. So we are well aware of everything that you do every day and then the extra work that comes when somebody like I show up.

And Nancy, thank you for including Eleanor in the Roosevelts. That is something that I think is well deserved. I’m always quoting her, so it’s nice to have her recognized. And the book that she wrote that Nancy just referenced is really something about her travels through South Asia. It’s quite a read. I have – I don’t think I’ve been anywhere in the world that Eleanor Roosevelt had not already been to. I’m still waiting to show up in a place where they say you’re the first woman who was ever a first lady that came to this country or visited here, because Mrs. Roosevelt was indefatigable.

So at this very well named house representing the values and the leadership of the United States, as we continue to chart the way forward in this most important relationship, I’m grateful to all of the Americans who served. And I’m especially grateful to our locally employed staff, all of our Indian employees. Because I am well aware that ambassadors come and go, and secretaries of state come and go, and political officers and councilor officers come and go, but it’s our locally employed staff who provide the continuity, who are here year in and year out, helping to train ambassadors and others of us. And we are very appreciative for the role that you’re playing.
So let’s continue to move forward and make this relationship even broader and deeper than it already is. And please know that those of us in Washington follow what you do with great interest and are very proud to be working with you. Thank you all. (Applause.)

Read Full Post »

For some reason, a lot of text from this trip is being posted late and without notifications.  As I am finding the events,  I am sharing, but I am dating them accurately for chronological purposes.  I am pretty sure a video of this might show up eventually.  If I find it, I will add it here.  This took place yesterday in New Delhi.

Remarks at Innovation Partnerships Event

Remarks

Hillary Rodham Clinton
Secretary of State
Indian Minister of Science and Technology Vilasrao Deshmukh
Taj Palace Hotel
New Delhi, India
May 8, 2012

MINISTER DESHMUKH: Good morning. Honorable Secretary of State and ladies and gentlemen, let me exchange a warm welcome to Secretary Clinton, for I have the first public engagement here in Delhi. I’m glad that this engagement is in the areas of science and innovation, which is our common priority. In fact, Madam Secretary, I was planning to visit U.S.A. today. (Laughter.) In view of our common interest in a joint innovation program and your visit to Delhi, I also rescheduled my plans and created this time space. Together – (applause) – we have witnessed just now a wonderful display of technology innovation. We have interacted with the powerful minds of some innovators. I’m fully convinced that our bilateral cooperation in the innovation space enjoys a bright future.

Strategic partnership between the two countries is – high technology areas has been flagged of by Prime Minister Dr. Manmohan Singh and President Obama. This has opened a new chapter in our cooperation. The visit of President Clinton in 2000 to India was a defining moment in our science and technology cooperation agenda. Secretary Clinton, we recall with fondness that the bi-national Indo-U.S. Science and Technology Forum was founded during the visit of your husband as President. You might like to convey that the forum he seeded has grown into a full fruit-yielding tree. It is the forum which has catalyzed several of the major joint initiatives we are witnessing today.

Over the last few years, science and technology engagements between our two countries have been both substantial and exhaustive. I acknowledge the contribution of our Ministry of External Affairs and the U.S. State Department. Now, we have started to address together a grand challenge through the tools of science. We are working in the areas of health, biomedical science, food security, clean energy, water cycle, and climate research. Our cooperation in knowledge-based industry sector has assured in full spirit of innovation and entrepreneurship among our entities. In the past, we were focused on attracting people for science. Now, our cooperation includes also science, but people of both countries. Our cooperation agenda represents a new measure of mutual trust and confidence.

Today, we wish to highlight the five-point program. But first of all, I wish to recognize the ongoing outcome of our Stanford-India Biodesign program supported by the Department of Biotechnology and the Indo-U.S. Science and Technology Forum involving Stanford University, AIIMS, IIT-Delhi. Under this program, about 25 high-quality minds have been trained to identify major healthcare needs and develop cost effective solutions. I’m convinced that this program will provide deployable healthcare solution covering a wide socioeconomic spectrum. I believe that we should try to replicate and establish several such innovative programs that will not only provide affordable healthcare solutions to our people, but also nurture the young minds to become job creators and job seekers – and not job seekers.

Second program about interest today is the India Innovation Growth Program supported by Department of Science and Technology and Lockheed Martin Corporation. It is under the successful BPP model of collaboration between our countries. Our 200 business engagements agreements have already been entered involving both India and U.S. enterprises. Products of some technologies have entered global marketplace as well as impact analysis report prepared by FICCI reveals that committed revenue generated by the innovators there in 2007 and ’10 amount to more than 70 U.S. million dollars.
The third major program of value showcased today is U.S.-India Endowment Fund established by two governments in 2009. The creation of this fund is another landmark in our belief to work together in the space of technology commercialization. I’m certain that our joint effort through this fund would foster commercialization of technology leading to societal impact. The program funded by DST and U.S. State Department have started to roll out project grants. We have witnessed today the first batch of such investment in the broad priority areas covering health issues and empowering citizens.

The fourth flagship is the Indo-U.S. Joint Clean Energy Research and Development Center. This is a bilateral initiative of my Ministry of Science and Technology with the U.S. Department of Energy. We have committed 25 million U.S. dollar from such – from each side. The joint center will support multi-institutional network project using consortia, partnerships based on public-private model of funding. We are focused on the areas of mutual interests covering solar energy, second generation bio-fuel, and energy efficient buildings. We assure you, Madam Secretary, that we are working to announce the exciting set of first awards in this – in the near future.

Finally, among the focus of innovation initiative, our USAID Millennium Alliance offering a new platform. Under this platform we expect to leverage creativity of the both nations an ability of U.S. to maximize quality Indian strength in optimizing resources. Together, we could develop competitive, affordable innovation. USAID has already contributed $7.7 million U.S. to this initiative. Today I’m happy to announce other contribution of U.S. $5 million to this fund. (Applause.)

FICCI hopes to scale up this fund to 50 million U.S. dollar over the next 12 months. This Millennium Alliance is a newer expression of our mutual commitment to engage another gainful partnership. Undoubtedly, our bilateral relationship today is a true partnership that uses a soft progress of science and technology and innovation for the benefit of people, the priority in both our countries. When the most powerful, large economies of the world join and develop their innovation agenda, it is bound to deliver values of global good. The world would want us to work together.

Let me end with assurance of my government’s fullest commitment and support to this bilateral endeavor and invite you, Madam Secretary, for your valuable thoughts and impressions. Thank you very much. (Applause.)

SECRETARY CLINTON: Minister, that was wonderful. Thank you so much. Well, good morning, and let me begin by thanking Minister Deshmukh for rearranging his schedule and being here today so that together we could highlight the excellent work that is taking place in the area of science and technology. And I thank you, Minister, for your warm welcome and for your personal work to strengthen trade and partnership between India and the United States. Our two great democracies share an enduring commitment to innovation. For decades, scientists, engineers, and social innovators from India and the United States have worked side-by-side. The most famous example, perhaps, are the agricultural improvements that led to the Green Revolution.

Today, I met entrepreneurs from an organization called Digital Green who are carrying on that work using technology to share agricultural best practices with farmers themselves. It is now possible, thanks to communications technology, for farmers to be in their villages looking at videos about agricultural techniques that they then can apply in their own work. Innovations like this – the one from Digital Green – has a ripple effect, generating economic growth, strengthening communities, supporting rural livelihoods, and improving health outcomes. We want to make it possible for more Indian and American entrepreneurs to collaborate on new ventures, more scientists and scholars to share data and build upon each other’s research, more students to live and learn together at each of our universities. Ultimately, we hope to foster generations of innovative thinkers and leaders who will continue to improve the lives of the Indian and American people and contribute to improving the lives of people everywhere.

We also want our governments to embrace the spirit of innovation to improve our own work and strengthen our partnership. And let me give you a few examples as to how we’re doing this: First, I am proud to announce the winner of the first U.S.-India Science and Technology Endowment Board grant. That is an initiative that I was privileged to launch with Minister Krishna on my first visit in early 2009 as Secretary here. The grant goes to a partnership between an American startup, Promethean Power, and India-based Icelings. They have developed a solar-powered system for refrigerated storage to keep fresh fruits and vegetables from spoiling. And this is a huge advance for India because lack of storage causes Indian farmers to lose approximately $10 billion in crops each year. This innovation promises farmers more income while also improving consumer’s access to fresh produce throughout the year. This partnership united different experiences and areas of expertise, and now with a little help from the endowment fund, Promethean Power and Icelings are helping solve a practical challenge that will make a real difference to people’s lives and incomes.

Second, I want to highlight a new Millennium Alliance initiated last year by USAID, our development agency, and the Federation of Indian Chambers of Commerce and Industry that is supported by the Government of India. This public-private partnership will help fund development solutions that deliver sustainable results for people and can be shared across the world. And at our Higher Education Dialogue this June, representatives of both governments, along with leaders from our higher education institutions, will examine additional ways in which new technologies can advance collaborations in education.

Third, one of the displays I had a chance to see earlier – and if the press and the people in attendance haven’t seen the displays, I hope that you will have a chance to do so – but one of them was the Stanford-India Biodesign project, which has developed an infant resuscitator, and the Lockheed Martin Innovation Growth program has awarded a grant to 3nethra for an eye scanner that can detect treatable diseases before they cause blindness. Both these cutting-age innovations cost a fraction of other medical devices that address these same problems, make lifesaving healthcare available to people who may not otherwise be able to afford treatment.

And finally, I want to recognize a young woman with us today. Bharati Chaturvedi is the leader of a group called Chintan India, which was one of the first ever winners of our Secretary of State’s Innovation Award for the Empowerment of Women and Girls. This award is a partnership between the State Department and the Rockefeller Foundation to support women’s equal participation in science, technology, entrepreneurship, and in all aspects of society, because, of course, you would expect me to believe, as I do, that women add a valuable perspective to problem solving, and supporting women in science is one of our priority areas of engagement between our countries. We will discuss this in more depth in June when we host the 2nd U.S.-India Joint Commission Meeting on Science and Technology Cooperation in Washington.

Now there are many more examples. The minister and I could literally keep you here all day, but we will not do that, I promise. But we are already developing, from the first commitment to cooperation back in 2000 when my husband paid a state visit, through the work that we’re doing today in the Obama Administration – we know we can make an enormous amount of progress. Some of the brightest minds of our two societies are already working together. They are seeking solutions for shared problems, and they are building the industries and creating the jobs for tomorrow.

So we can and do – we can and must do more on the government level to spur institutional partnerships. These public-private partnerships are really an incredible way to bring the best of government and the best of industries, academia, and non-for-profit organizations together. And I hope that we will see even more sprouting forth. We look to you, the innovators, the inventors, the researchers, the dreamers, in this audience today for your leadership. The minister and I are happy to be in receive mode. We want to hear from you about what you think will work. We are working hard to set up the institutions that will then be responsive, but it’s really up to each of you who has that idea and is willing to work hard in order to see it come into reality.

So Minister, again, thank you. And thanks to all of the innovators; thanks to all the public-private partners. We are really excited by the progress we’re making together. Thank you all very much. (Applause.)

Thank you minister. Thank you so much. Thank you.

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

 

Read Full Post »

Vodpod videos no longer available.

Jill Dougherty, posted with vodpod

Interview With Jill Dougherty of CNN

Interview

Hillary Rodham Clinton
Secretary of State
Taj Palace Hotel
Delhi, India
May 8, 2012

QUESTION: Secretary Clinton, thank you very much for being with us. This has been quite a trip, and I want to begin at the beginning, in China. Mr. Chen, Chen Guangcheng, is still in the hospital. Do you believe that China will follow through on this agreement and allow him to get out, come to the United States?

SECRETARY CLINTON: Well, Jill, I think that we’re looking forward to welcoming him to the United States. He is still in the hospital receiving medical treatment, some of which was recommended by the Embassy doctors who examined him. We remain in close contact with him. We know that Chinese officials have visited him in the hospital in order to begin processing necessary papers, and we’re doing the same in order to prepare the way so that he can come here and pursue his studies.

QUESTION: But do you believe that the government will follow through on what it promised?

SECRETARY CLINTON: Well, we’re looking forward to welcoming him and seeing him have the chance to pursue the studies that he has said he’s interested in doing.

QUESTION: Right now there is a smear campaign against him. Some of his relatives and friends are being picked up by the police. Some apparently have been beaten up. What, if anything, can the United States do? Are you going to be talking about this?

SECRETARY CLINTON: Well, we talk about the full range of human rights issues, the specific cases that are part of our ongoing dialogue and the more general concerns that we have. So I think it’s fair to say that any issue will be addressed. It is for us, though, principally the focus of our efforts now to do what we can to bring Mr. Chen and his family to the United States.

QUESTION: Now, Mitt Romney, in the middle of this, made some comments, some critical comments. Was it correct for him to do that?

SECRETARY CLINTON: Well, I’m not going to get into domestic American politics. That’s something that I am staying out of for all the obvious reasons. But I think that the work that was done in this exceptionally unusual case with extraordinary circumstances was a very important demonstration of both American values and Mr. Chen’s wishes. And I think that it was in the best tradition of what American diplomacy is about.

QUESTION: Now, here in India, one of the big issues is Iranian sanctions. And of course, we have the deadline getting closer for countries that should cut back on imports of Iranian oil. One of those countries happens to be India. What are they saying to you – the Indians – about this? Will they meet those targets?

SECRETARY CLINTON: Well, India has reduced its dependence on Iranian oil. I know their refineries have stopped asking for orders to purchase Iranian oil. So they certainly have taken steps. We are working with them to help them in any way that we can offer technical assistance, and next week my energy coordinator, Ambassador Carlos Pascual, will be here in India with a team of experts. Because we know that this is hard for India, just like it’s been hard for some of the European countries that were very dependent upon Iranian oil, for Japan. And we have worked with them and offered suggestions about alternative sources of supply at an affordable cost. So we appreciate the steps that India has taken, and we’re continuing to consult with them.

QUESTION: But it does place friends in a difficult situation.

SECRETARY CLINTON: Well, India shares exactly our goal. Their goal is our goal, and that is to prevent Iran from becoming a nuclear weapons nation, which we think would be greatly destabilizing of the region and the world, and in fact could lead to greater disruptions of oil supply which would also be damaging to India.

So everything in this high-stakes diplomacy that we’re engaged in is an exercise in calculations. The Indians and the United States are on exactly the same side as the international consensus that Iran cannot, should not, must not, have a nuclear weapon. I don’t think Iran would be at the table discussing this with the so-called P-5+1 nations if we hadn’t implemented very tough sanctions. We want to keep the sanctions pressure on, which requires – yes – our friends, nations with whom we have great areas of agreement, to have to make some tough choices.

QUESTION: I want to ask you about Alan Gross. CNN’s Wolf Blitzer did an interview with him. He, of course, is the American who has been held in Cuba. And he – Blitzer, Mr. Blitzer, got an answer from the ambassador, the Cuban ambassador, at the Interests Section saying, look, we have the Cuban Five who are being held in just as if not worse circumstances than Mr. Gross, but we are willing to solve this on a reciprocal basis.

What would have to be done in order to free Alan Gross?

SECRETARY CLINTON: Well, first of all, Mr. Gross should not even be incarcerated in Cuba. Mr. Gross was not a spy. Mr. Gross was not an intelligence agent. Mr. Gross worked for a development group that was helping Cubans, principally in their small Jewish community in Cuba, to have access to the internet. And Mr. Gross, in our view, is being held without justification and has been detained already far too long. So there should be a decision by the Cuban Government to release him, and we would like to see that happen as soon as possible.

Now, we are well aware that the Cuban Government wants to see the release of their intelligence agents, five Cuban spies who were lawfully arrested, tried, and convicted for espionage. One has already served his sentence in prison. He’s continuing to finish out his parole. Another will be up for parole – all within the regular order of our system, a system that provides due process, rule of law protections. It does not have a record of arbitrary arrests or detentions like the Cuban Government does.

I am deeply distressed and unhappy for the Gross family. I’ve met with Judy Gross. People in the State Department stay in close touch with her and with her family. They have been incredibly brave in the face of this injustice. But the Cuban Government has released political prisoners, which is something we’d like to see them do with Mr. Gross.

QUESTION: The French election brought in Mssr. Francois Hollande, who I’d like to get your opinion on how this might affect things, specifically let’s say in the use of military action or a harder approach when it comes to international action, let’s say areas like Libya. Certainly, under Mr. Sarkozy, he was quite strong in terms of using military action. What are you anticipating? What would be your hopes with the incoming president?

SECRETARY CLINTON: Well, first we’re looking forward to receiving the new French president, and he’ll be coming to the United States for a visit, attending the G-8 summit, the NATO summit in Chicago. So there’s a lot of anticipation on the part of our government and I think our nation, because France is our oldest ally. We have a deep, long, enduring relationship with France, with the government of France, with the people of France. So until we’ve had a chance to actually consult and hear his views and have a chance to express our own, we’re going to be waiting eagerly to do that.

QUESTION: Have you been following the demonstrations in Moscow, the crackdown on those demonstrations?

SECRETARY CLINTON: Right. Well, certainly from the TV coverage I have seen the extent of the demonstrations. And I think it goes to the hope that all Russians have and that everyone who cares about Russia has that with the new term that President Putin is about to begin, Russia will be able to continue democratizing, protecting and respecting the rights of all Russian citizens, ensuring that there is a level playing field for political and economic participation. And I think that for those of us watching from afar on television who have such great respect for Russia, as I know you do, having lived there and studied and really become quite knowledgeable about Russia, we want Russia to fulfill its own potential. And that, of course, means giving people the chance to express themselves.

QUESTION: I know you have to catch a plane, so let me just ask you a quick question. Vice President Biden made an interesting comment. He was asked about 2016, and he said – I think he said you and he could be a team, and then he said, “I don’t know whether I want to run and Hillary doesn’t know whether she wants to run.” So I was wondering if he knows something about you that you don’t know. (Laughter.)

SECRETARY CLINTON: I don’t think so. We’ve been friends for a long time and we’ve been on the same team. We’ve been on the same team in the Senate. We’re on the same team now for President Obama. And no matter what I do in the future, I’d love to have Joe be on my team, because he is a great and effective person who cares deeply about our country.

QUESTION: And just one last question. When you were at that town hall in Kolkata, and almost every town hall, there are always personal questions about you. And you went on at some length about the glass ceiling, the double standards about women. And right after that, now in the blogosphere there is a big thing about Hillary Au Naturel; in other words, you without makeup, you wearing glasses. (Laughter.) What can I say? But this is exactly what you were saying, that it’s either the hair or it’s something like that.

SECRETARY CLINTON: I feel so relieved to be at the stage I’m at in my life right now, Jill, because if I want to wear my glasses, I’m wearing my glasses. If I want to pull my hair back, I’m pulling my hair back. And at some point it’s just not something that deserves a whole lot of time and attention, and if others want to worry about it, I’ll let them do the worrying for a change.

QUESTION: So it doesn’t drive you crazy?

SECRETARY CLINTON: It doesn’t drive me crazy at all. It’s just not something that I think is that important anymore. (Laughter.)

QUESTION: I agree. (Laughter.) Okay, well, thank you very much, Secretary Clinton.

SECRETARY CLINTON: Thank you.

Read Full Post »

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »

%d bloggers like this: