You may or may not remember Bradley Manning stating this as his motivation.
Bradley Manning
Bradley Manning
“Hillary Clinton and several thousand diplomats around the world are going to have a heart attack when they wake up one morning and find an entire repository of classified foreign policy is available, in searchable format, to the public,” … “Everywhere there’s a US post, there’s a diplomatic scandal that will be revealed.” These are quotes from Bradley Manning, the source behind the WikiLeaks document scandal that exposed embassy mail from around the world.
If you were hanging out here in those days you may remember Hillary Clinton’s reaction to Manning’s actions.
Hillary Rodham Clinton
Secretary of StateTreaty RoomWashington, DCNovember 29, 2010SECRETARY CLINTON: Well, good afternoon. Do we have enough room in here? I want to take a moment to discuss the recent news reports of classified documents that were illegally provided from United States Government computers. In my conversations with counterparts from around the world over the past few days, and in my meeting earlier today with Foreign Minister Davutoglu of Turkey, I have had very productive discussions on this issue.
The United States strongly condemns the illegal disclosure of classified information. It puts people’s lives in danger, threatens our national security, and undermines our efforts to work with other countries to solve shared problems. This Administration is advancing a robust foreign policy that is focused on advancing America’s national interests and leading the world in solving the most complex challenges of our time, from fixing the global economy, to thwarting international terrorism, to stopping the spread of catastrophic weapons, to advancing human rights and universal values. In every country and in every region of the world, we are working with partners to pursue these aims.
So let’s be clear: this disclosure is not just an attack on America’s foreign policy interests. It is an attack on the international community – the alliances and partnerships, the conversations and negotiations, that safeguard global security and advance economic prosperity.
Immediately following these remarks, Secretary Clinton set forth on what was to become known as her “apology tour” wherein she conducted a series of closed-door bilaterals during which, presumably, she was apologizing for leaked information that might have been embarrassing. More crucial, of course, was the question of whether operatives, American and foreign nationals, might have been exposed and in danger – the real reason for the closed doors. If there was a lesson to be learned from the Boston Marathon bombings, and there were several, one was that the United State shares intel with its friends and partners.
SECRETARY OF STATE HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON: Public Schedule for December 1, 2010
December 1, 2010 by still4hill | Edit
Public Schedule for December 1, 2010
Washington, DCDecember 1, 2010
SECRETARY OF STATE HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON:
Secretary Clinton is on foreign travel. For more information on her foreign travel, click here.
Yesterday, Manning made this statement upon sentencing.
“I regret if my actions hurt anyone or harmed the United States. It was never my intent to hurt anyone. … When I chose to disclose classified information, I did so out of a love for my country and a sense of duty to others.”
Certainly the probability exists that people were endangered and possibly hurt. The deception in Manning’s words is his claim that he meant no harm. If you love your country, you do not violate oaths you have taken. You do not expose fellow citizens to peril. You do not provide classified and secret information to those who can and might make it available to enemies in time of war, and you do not do this as if your “practical joke” will cause harm to high officials in your government and other cooperative governments. You do not do these things lightly in a time of war.
So this morning, we awakened to the news that Bradley Manning is no longer a man but rather a woman – a woman to be called “Chelsea.” Really?
Bradley Manning wants to live as a woman
Following his sentencing to 35 years for leaking military documents to WikiLeaks, Bradley Manning now seeks hormone treatments and wants to live as a woman named Chelsea.
Who is Manning?
At left, Manning is escorted from a courthouse in Fort Meade, Md., on Dec. 22, 2011. At right, in an undated file photo provided by the U.S. Army, Manning is shown wearing a wig and lipstick. (AP Photos)
Without getting into the LGBT issues here or the legal intricacies of the degree to which what a prisoner “wants” should be obliged or where we draw lines re: necessary medical interventions on their behalf – I mean I have committed no crimes and would like to be 5’7″ and might want a LifeStyle Lift one day (will you taxpayers please fund it?) – without even asking if convicts have a right to a name change (spies do this all the time, after all) – I do feel it incumbent on me to ask what name could have been more ironic? Oh, wait! I know! Hillary Manning. Yes, that would be a tad more ironic!
You did it, Manning, so man up! To me, your name is Mudd!
Thank you, Still, for showing us the big picture. From what I’ve been reading today on FB and Twitter, virtually all of the mainstream media no longer sees Bradley Manning’s actions as harmful or wrong because Chelsea Manning is so, so brave to come out as transgendered. I don’t think any of this helps the transgender community at all and I hope they distance themselves from this individual.
LikeLike
When I got hooked on True Blood, I had a colleague, who had never watched it, who insisted that the vampires were a metaphor for the LGBT community. I argued no. She insisted I was wrong, but my argument was that once you have the gay community represented both as humans (Lafayette) and gays (Tara) the metaphor disintegrates. There is no longer a metaphor.
There is no mutual exclusivity here. If you are trans, gay, or straight there is no cloak of innocence for doing harm to your government any more than these categories decide whether you are a hero or not for performing an heroic deed.
Certainly the LGBT community lives in risk – even here never mind Russia – but violating your oath remains a violation and prosecution for that should know no barriers of any kind – regardless of your personal or political reasons.
LikeLike
Here’s an article that sheds some light on Manning’s actions, and Snowden’s as well: http://www.businessinsider.com/what-snowden-and-manning-dont-understand-about-secrecy-2013-8
LikeLike
Thank you, Jen.
LikeLike
[…] Chelsea WoManning? #AYKM? | Still4Hill […]
LikeLike