Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Posts Tagged ‘NATO’

Here is something to look forward to on Monday. The picture is from last April when she participated in a NATO conference in Europe.

Secretary Clinton to Deliver Remarks on the Future of NATO on Monday, February 22

Office of the Spokesman
Washington, DC
February 19, 2010

Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton will deliver remarks on the Future of NATO on Monday, February 22 at 6:00 p.m. at the Ritz Carlton in Washington, D.C. Atlantic Council Chairman Senator Chuck Hagel will offer welcoming remarks, and former Secretary of State Madeleine Albright will introduce Secretary Clinton.

Secretary Clinton’s remarks are the opening event of the Washington Strategic Concept Seminar, which will focus on future NATO capabilities and forces as well as provide recommendations for drafting NATO’s next Strategic Concept. The seminar is co-hosted by The National Defense University and Allied Command Transformation in partnership with the Atlantic Council, the Center for Strategic and International Studies, the German Marshall Fund of the United States and the Johns Hopkins SAIS Center for Transatlantic Relations.

Read Full Post »

Remarks At Press Conference at NATO Headquarters

Hillary Rodham Clinton
Secretary of State
Brussels, Belgium
December 4, 2009

SECRETARY CLINTON: Today we had the chance to discuss the way forward in Afghanistan and Pakistan with all of our NATO allies and ISAF partners. The violent extremism that threatens the people and governments of Afghanistan and Pakistan and undermines the stability of the region also threatens us, the security of our friends, our allies, and our interests around the world. All of us whose shared future is at stake must therefore take responsibility for securing it.

On Tuesday, as you know, President Obama announced that the United States is sending an additional 30,000 troops to Afghanistan, significantly increasing our civilian aid to the Afghan people and broadening our partnership with Pakistan. All of NATO and ISAF are standing with us in strong support of the President’s strategy. I want to thank those nations that have pledged additional troops, trainers, and civilian assistance in recent days and weeks. I welcome the Secretary General’s report today that at least 25 countries have announced that they will send more forces to the mission in 2010. They have offered around 7,000 new forces, and we’re still counting. Secretary General Rasmussen and the leadership and people of all of these countries deserve our gratitude.

This is a crucial test for NATO, which has been the greatest and most successful military alliance in history. The American people will always remember that after 9/11 NATO invoked Article 5 of its charter for the first time, affirming that the terrorist attacks planned in Afghanistan and perpetrated in the United States were attacks on every NATO member. We are keenly aware that the members of this alliance have paid a steep price in lives and treasure, and we honor the service and sacrifice of the brave troops who have fought alongside our own soldiers. And it is crucial that we remain firm in our resolve and see this mission through. We will work together to deny al-Qaida a safe haven, reverse the Taliban’s momentum and deny it the ability to overthrow the Afghan Government, and strengthen the capacity of the Afghans to take responsibility for their own security.

President Obama has outlined a timeframe for that transition to Afghan responsibility. As he said in his speech on Tuesday, the additional American and international troops will allow us to accelerate handing over responsibility to Afghan forces, beginning in July 2011. This transition will enable us to begin a reduction of U.S. and international forces that will continue over time. Just as we have done in Iraq, we will execute this transition responsibly, taking into account conditions on the ground.

Accomplishing our objectives will require us to combine the work of our military with an equally critical long-term civilian assistance program. We believe that integrating our military and civilian efforts is essential to our success. We have a sound strategy. We will deliver high-impact economic assistance and bolster Afghanistan’s agricultural sector, which is the traditional core of the Afghan economy. This will create jobs, reduce the funding the Taliban receives from poppy cultivation, and help draw insurgents off the battlefield. We will also help to strengthen institutions at every level of Afghan society so that there will be stability and security as our military forces begin to depart.

And I want to stress that, speaking for the United States, our civilian commitment will continue long after our combat forces leave. It should be clear to everyone that we will not repeat the mistakes of the past. The United States and our allies and partners have an enduring commitment to Afghanistan, Pakistan, and the region.

Ultimately, we recognize that only the Afghan people can decide what kind of nation they want to build for themselves and their children. Only the Pakistani people can ensure their country’s democratic future. That is why we are working as partners in both countries: supporting Afghans as they build institutions, solidify the rule of law, and enhance their capacity to provide their own security; and supporting the Pakistanis as they defend their democracy, develop their economy, and respond to the kind of horrific attacks we saw on a mosque today.

Now, we’ve also discussed a number of other shared challenges during this NATO ministerial. On missile defense, our allies strongly expressed their support for the new American approach, and NATO officially noted the important role missile defense plays in the protection of our population, territory, and forces.

I also had the opportunity to discuss Iran, the upcoming climate change summit in Copenhagen, expanded partnerships with aspirating NATO members. I had a productive meeting with Foreign Minister Lavrov focusing on continuing progress toward a post-START agreement.

This is a historic time in Europe with the 60th anniversary of NATO, the ratification of the Lisbon Treaty, the naming of the first permanent president of the European Council. And today, I am more confident than ever that the Transatlantic Alliance which has anchored our peace and prosperity for so long will provide a strong foundation for our shared future.

Thank you, and I’d be glad to take your questions.

MODERATOR: We have time for two questions.

CNN.

QUESTION: Thank you, Madame Secretary. I’m wondering if you could qualify that 7,000 troop number that you just mentioned – it seems open to interpretation – includes some troops that have already been in country since the election. Some are training forces, some will be leaving. So how robust of a pledge is this, given the need? And what else do you need that hasn’t been pledged? And what are your thoughts on the need for strengthening the international civilian effort and discussion about some kind of larger coordinating role? Thank you.

SECRETARY CLINTON: Well, first of all, the report from the Secretary General of the 7,000-plus troops are the troops that will be there in 2010 that would not have been there in 2010. These are not only new pledges of troops, but these are troops that were put in only for the election that we had expected to be leaving that will now, pursuant to our new strategy, stay and be part of implementing that new strategy. They are a mix of combat troops and trainers.

But one point I would make is that there is a very clear glide path between trainers and combat troops, because it has been our experience – and certainly, General McChrystal intends to apply this in Afghanistan – that training is not only about the beginning of military preparation, helping recruits learn the basics about their weapons, about formations and the like, but it also includes partnering with those troops, mentoring those troops, and going into combat with those troops. So there are some that are strictly just combat and just trainers, but there are others who will fall along the continuum as to the various functions that will need to be performed. So this is a significant commitment by our NATO ISAF partners on behalf of the new strategy that will be executed by General McChrystal going forward.

With respect to the civilian side, we know we’ve got to do a better job coordinating our international aid. There’s a great desire on the part of not only governments, but NGOs, to support the development of Afghanistan. And we’ve had a number of conversations with our Afghan partners about how best to utilize that assistance. And with our upcoming conference at the end of January, we hope by then to have worked out the mechanism for providing that coordination.

I am just extremely heartened by the level of positive response we’ve received. Certainly the commitments of troops and additional civilian assistance are a tangible representation of that. But I was also very touched by many of the comments that were made both publicly and privately by ministers from literally throughout the world, since it was not only NATO ministers who were here, about their commitment to the President’s strategy going forward and their willingness to continue to make the sacrifices that this strategy calls on all of us to have to do.

QUESTION: I’m Paul (inaudible) TV, the Netherlands. Madame Secretary, and contrary to all the pledges you’ve heard today, you know that the Dutch Government has decided to leave Afghanistan by next year, mid next year. How do you feel about it? Do you think that they should stay? Are you trying to convince them to stay longer? And if so, how successful are you so far?

SECRETARY CLINTON: Well, I said when I was in The Hague at the conference, which the Dutch Government sponsored back in the spring, where we began to focus on the way forward in Afghanistan, we took a look at what we inherited. We didn’t like what we saw. And we began to retool what we thought was the best approach. And I have to say that much of what we have come up with is modeled on what the Dutch have done. The Dutch forces in Afghanistan came up with the model of the three Ds: defense, diplomacy, and development. They were ahead of, certainly – I’ll speak for the United States – they were ahead of us. The results they got demonstrated the effectiveness of their approach. So, of course, we would like to see the Dutch continue, but that’s clearly a decision for the government and the people of the Netherlands.

But I want to express very strongly my appreciation for what they have done, and the fact that they will continue to be with us for the next year just about. And they will continue to make a significant contribution, for which we’re grateful.

I think maybe take one or two more. If you’ll identify yourself, please.

QUESTION: Ricardo Martinez de Rituerto with El Pais from Spain. Madame Secretary, we all know very well what the United States is going to do in talking about the soldiers, 30,000, maybe 33,000. What is exactly what is expected from the rest of the international community? We have been talking about 7, but we are expecting 10, 12 thousand?

SECRETARY CLINTON: Well, I think that what we see today with the commitments that have already been made is very encouraging. This is a difficult task we are undertaking together. We need both more numbers than we have just with our own troops, and we need more specific functions than are already present. And I think we’ve gone a very long way towards meeting those needs today.

And I appreciate very much the representation by the Spanish foreign minister in our meeting that Spain will be coming forth with a pledge after further consultation within your government, and we welcome that. Spain has been a very good partner on both the military and the civilian side, and we want to continue working with both Spanish military and civilian forces as we implement that strategy.

QUESTION: Katie (inaudible) with Georgian Public Broadcasting. Madame Secretary, how can you evaluate Georgia’s contribution in ISAF mission? And in – on your meetings today in NATO-Russia Council and Mr. Lavrov, did you raise the issue of Georgia’s territorial integrity? Thank you.

SECRETARY CLINTON: I think it is accurate – I’m not sure, but I think it is accurate to say that Georgia may be the largest per capita contributor to the NATO ISAF mission. Georgia announced today that they were going forward with the troops that are being trained and that they want to continue to be a very helpful partner in Afghanistan. And I just want to thank the government and people of Georgia for an extraordinary effort.

I did raise Georgia at the NATO-Russia Council. I made it very clear that the United States supported Georgia, that we would never recognize South Ossetia and Abkhazia, that we wish to see Russia work with the international community to bring about a peaceful resolution of the situation, that we applauded the creation of a monitoring system that would try to prevent actions from escalating. But we very much stand with the people of Georgia, and we’re very grateful for Georgia’s contributions to this important mission in Afghanistan.

QUESTION: Guldenay Sonumut from NTV Turkey. The United States of America have asked Turkey to contribute with some troops also in Afghanistan, but – and particularly combat troops, but apparently, Turkey refuses this. How do you evaluate this, bearing in mind that Prime Minister Erdogan will fly to Washington and discuss many, many other issues and, in particular, this? Thank you.

SECRETARY CLINTON: Well, we are very much looking forward to Prime Minister Erdogan’s visit on Monday. I am very grateful to Turkey. I have worked now with two foreign ministers since becoming Secretary of State, and I am very grateful for the cooperation and their partnership on many important matters.

With respect to Afghanistan, Turkey has been with us from the beginning. Turkey has performed a very important function. They are about, once again, to take over command for the Kabul area. We value highly the Turkish contribution, the professionalization of the Turkish military. And of course, we are always hopeful of getting even more assistance from Turkey because it is so important. But we also are grateful for what we have received. And we look forward to working with Turkey in a leadership position on a number of important issues that will be discussed when Prime Minister Erdogan visits President Obama on Monday.

Thank you all very much.

Read Full Post »

The Secretary of State traveled to Brussels to confer with the Foreign Ministers of NATO member states and seek support for the surge in Afghanistan.

She held a press briefing on the trip over. Here is the transcript.

Briefing En Route Brussels, Belgium

Hillary Rodham Clinton
Secretary of State
En Route Brussels, Belgium
December 3, 2009

STAFF: Now, don’t you think the best way to follow up nine hours of testimony is 10 minutes with an eager press corps?

SECRETARY CLINTON: I think that’s probably a good idea, Mark.

STAFF: There’s 10 minutes between now and takeoff, sure.

SECRETARY CLINTON: Yeah, absolutely.

QUESTION: Well, maybe we could just ask you to preview for us what you hope to get out of tomorrow —

SECRETARY CLINTON: Okay.

QUESTION: — and specifically (inaudible).

SECRETARY CLINTON: Well, we have a lot of people on the ground already who are working and talking with our NATO allies. Ambassador Holbrooke is there, Deputy Jim Steinberg is there, Assistant Secretary Phil Gordon is there, obviously our Ambassador Ivo Daalder is there. And we’ve been doing intensive outreach to all of our NATO ISAF partners.

I spoke with Secretary General Rasmussen yesterday. He has been also traveling to capitals, meeting with heads of state. And we are encouraged that we’re going to, beginning tomorrow but not ending tomorrow, have a number of public announcements about additional troop commitments, additional civilian assistance, and development aid as well.

The response has been positive. I’ve spoken to probably 20, 25 of my counterparts over the last week. And there is an understanding about the importance of the mission that the President has described. There is a desire to be able to explain it to the publics of various countries, and to make sure that in coalition governments the political stars are in alignment to be able to announce additional commitments. But we feel good about it.

QUESTION: May I ask about the 2011 date? We had understood, or we heard yesterday that there was some, perhaps, confusion about the timetable. Do you think you have a lot to do to explain that? Do you think the allies understand the balancing act between surging and withdrawing?

SECRETARY CLINTON: Well, I think that we’re very clear that this is, as Secretary Gates said this morning, an inflection point, that starting in 2011, we will be prepared for a responsible transfer of security responsibility to the Afghan security forces based on the conditions as we evaluate them at that time. Now, that doesn’t mean we’re going to get to 2011 and jump off a cliff. It means that we’re going to be as careful and deliberative as necessary, but that we expect by 2011 to be able to pass off (inaudible) the responsibility for security to an improved, larger Afghan security force, which we will be training with simultaneously over the next 18 months.

So I think that there have been (inaudible) misunderstandings about what that date meant, which I hope we’ve cleared up in the last two days of testimony and which I’ll be more than happy to discuss with any of our partners in Brussels.

QUESTION: Why do you think there was that misunderstanding? Because this is something that was very important for the President to really nail.

SECRETARY CLINTON: Right.

QUESTION: So if he didn’t nail it —

SECRETARY CLINTON: But, Jill, if you go back and look at his speech, what he said – and then what I just said is in his speech. It said that that will be a day that we – that that will be the time when we begin to transfer security. We will do it in a responsible way based on conditions. But I think that some people seized on that, for whatever reason or lack of understanding, as a way to try to create a difference where I’m not sure there is one between where they are and where the President is.

QUESTION: What are you looking for from NATO?

QUESTION: Is it mainly trainers? Is it mainly —

SECRETARY CLINTON: It’s everything. It’s the whole range of more combat forces and more trainers, but there is not as big a distinction between those two as some have, I think, unrealistically posited, because the best way to actually create a fighting unit is through partnering in combat. So yes, there are people who will do what we think of as training – here’s how you load your weapons, here’s what – the kind of logistical experiences you need. But we’ve got to bring the Afghan security forces into the fight.

And it is a fact that General McChrystal has made a number of significant changes that one would ask, why weren’t they made before, but the fact is they weren’t. And so we are implementing a new training approach. We are implementing a different form of partnering between NATO ISAF and the Afghans. When I was there, Minister Wardak, the defense minister who has been there from the very beginning – and he has really labored hard, everybody who knows him who has worked with him has a high opinion of him – he was just with this big smile on his face telling me that it’s the first time he has felt fully integrated into the NATO ISAF structure.

I mean, that’s a little bit discouraging when one looks back, but he said we’re in it now, we’re getting the intelligence now. McChrystal has changed some of the rules of engagement on air support for combat, on nighttime raids using dogs. There has been so much change, and we’ve seen improvements in Helmand Province since the Marines arrived in July.

So this is putting all the pieces together, and I think that when you say, well, what will be doing – combat, training, logistical support, intelligence, all of that is part of the kind of partnership we’re now trying to provide to the Afghans.

Read Full Post »

Daily Appointments Schedule for November 25, 2009 Washington, DC November 25, 2009 SECRETARY OF STATE CLINTON: No Public Appointments OTHER: 12 Noon: Special Press Briefing by Special Envoy for Middle East Peace Senator George Mitchell, State Department Press Briefing Room (ON THE RECORD / ON CAMERA) THE DAILY PRESS BRIEFING WILL BEGIN AT APPROXIMATELY 12:30 P.M. ************************************************************************************************ Well, we know that does not necessarily mean no appointments but only that, if there ARE appointments, they will not be public. I hope it means she is home or headed there for the holiday! By the way, Secretary Clinton, looking adorable here. I hope we find some photos from last night! There do not seem to be any out there!

*********Breaking news from CNN is that the Secretary will  be back on HillForce One for NATO headquarters next week immediately following the President’s announcement of the new Afghanistan strategy.

**********UPDATE: This is in direct conflict with the CNN report above Sec. Gates, Sec. Clinton, Adm. Mullen Scheduled To Testify Wednesday On Afghanistan

Read Full Post »

Remarks at the Transatlantic Dinner

Remarks

Hillary Rodham Clinton
Secretary of State
Waldorf-Astoria Hotel
New York, NY
September 22, 2009

Date: 09/22/2009 Description: Secretary Clinton with UK Foreign Secretary David Miliband at Transatlantic Dinner with EU and NATO Foreign Ministers at the Waldorf-Astoria in the Empire Room. © State Dept Image by Michael Gross SECRETARY CLINTON: Well, let me welcome all of you to this Transatlantic Dinner. It is a real pleasure to see so many friends and colleagues both from the EU and NATO. We have the opportunity several times a year to come together to talk about the important matters that we are all concerned with, and tonight, I hope we can cover a number of issues that are of significance to each of our countries and, of course, to the EU and to NATO.
But I mostly just want to thank you for taking time out of what is an overwhelmingly busy schedule to share this time. And we’ll be efficient, because there are some, like David and Lawrence, who have other dinners, and I’m sure there are many of you who have consecutive obligations. So I think with that, we’ll ask the press to go have dinner, and we’ll be able to both start dinner and start our conversation. Thank you all very much.

 

Read Full Post »

Having been negligent about posting here, I now find myself having to catch-up with a whole long trip the intrepid, indomitable and inexhaustible Secretary of State has been on Since March 31. Barely had her feet hit the ground in D.C. after her Mexican excursion, when she once again mounted the “Big Blue Plane” and took off for Europe. Here’s her journey.

She touched down in Amsterdam for a Conference on Afghanistan at The Hague. Here we see her with Dutch Foreign Minister Maxime Verhagen.

090331_HillaryAtTheHague

Of course she spoke.

Remarks at The International Conference on Afghanistan

Speech

Hillary Rodham Clinton
Secretary of State
The Hague, Netherlands
March 31, 2009

Thank you very much, Minister Verhagen, and Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon, Special Representative Kai Eide, President Karzai, Minister Spanta, friends and colleagues, I want to thank all of you, and especially the United Nations and the Government of the Netherlands for hosting us. I also want to acknowledge the extraordinary contribution of the government and people of the Netherlands to the mission in Afghanistan.
And I want to also acknowledge President Karzai, who fills a critical leadership role in his nation, and whose government helped to shape the shared comprehensive and workable strategy that we are discussing today.
We are here to help the people of Afghanistan prevail against a ruthless enemy who poses a common threat to us all. Afghanistan has always been a crossroads of civilization, and today we find our fate converging in those plains and mountains that are so far and yet so near in this interconnected world to all of us.

Thanks to the efforts of the international community, the perpetrators of the horrific terrorist attacks of 9/11 – attacks which killed citizens from more than 90 countries – were driven from Afghanistan, and the Afghan people made a promising start toward a more secure future. But since those first hopeful moments, our collective inability to implement a clear and sustained strategy has allowed violent extremists to regain a foothold in Afghanistan and in Pakistan, and to make the area a nerve center for efforts to spread violence from London to Mumbai.

The range of countries and institutions represented here is a universal recognition that what happens in Afghanistan matters to us all. Our failure to bring peace and progress would be a setback not only to the people of Afghanistan, but to the entire enterprise of collective action in the interest of collective security. Our success, on the other hand, will not only benefit Afghanistan, Pakistan and the region, but also the blueprint for a new diplomacy powered by partnership and premised on shared interests.

So as we recommit ourselves to meet our common challenge with a new strategy, new energy, and new resources, let us be guided by an ancient Afghan proverb, “patience is bitter, but its fruit is sweet.”

The plan I outline today is the product of intensive consultations with nations that have donated troops and support; Afghanistan’s neighbors and international institutions that play a vital role in Afghanistan’s future. The results of these consultations are clear: Our strategy must address the challenge in Afghanistan and Pakistan; it must integrate military and civilian activities and support them with vigorous international diplomacy; and it must rest on the simple premise that while we can and will help, Afghanistan’s future ultimately rests with the Afghan people and their elected government. Security is the essential first step; without it, all else fails. Afghanistan’s army and police will have to take the lead, supported by the International Security Assistance Force.

President Obama has announced that the United States will deploy 17,000 more soldiers and 4,000 additional military trainers to help build up Afghan security forces. The international community will also have to help. We should provide every army and police unit in Afghanistan with an international partner that can provide training and help build capacity. Our collective goal should be standing up an army of at least 134,000 soldiers and a police force of at least 82,000 officers by 2011. These steps will provide the people of Afghanistan with an opportunity to fight and win their own battle for their nation’s future.

We must also help Afghans strengthen their economy and institutions. They know how to rebuild their country, but they need the raw material of progress – roads, public institutions, schools, hospitals, irrigation, and agriculture. The United States is supporting the Government of Afghanistan’s National Development Strategy, the National Solidarity Program, and other initiatives that help Afghans improve their lives and strengthen their own communities.

In consultation with the Afghan Government, we have also identified agriculture – which comprises 70 percent of Afghanistan’s economy – as the key for development. In the 1970s, Afghans exported food to their neighbors. They were often called the garden of Central Asia. Today, this sector lags far behind, and its problems feed the deadly malignancy of the narcotics trade. The United States is focusing its efforts on rural development in provinces near the Afghan-Pakistan border, and we hope that others gathered here will heed the United Nations’ and Afghan Government’s call for help throughout the country with job creation, technical expertise, vocational training, and investments in roads, electrical transmission lines, education, healthcare, and so much else.

As we work with the Afghan people to supply these building blocks of development, we must demand accountability from ourselves and from the Afghan Government. Corruption is a cancer as dangerous to long-term success as the Taliban or al-Qaida. A government that cannot deliver accountable services for its people is a terrorist’s best recruiting tool.

So we must work with bodies such as Afghanistan’s Independent Directorate of Local Governance to ensure that the government at all levels is responsible and transparent. The international community, gathered here, can help by providing auditors and governance experts and training a new generation of civil servants and administrators.

To earn the trust of the Afghan people, the Afghan Government must be legitimate and respected. This requires a successful election in August – one that is open, free, and fair. That can only happen with strong support from the international community. I am, therefore, pleased to announce today that to advance that goal, the United States is committing $40 million to help fund Afghanistan’s upcoming elections.

We must also support efforts by the Government of Afghanistan to separate the extremists of al-Qaida and the Taliban from those who joined their ranks not out of conviction, but out of desperation. This is, in fact, the case for a majority of those fighting with the Taliban. They should be offered an honorable form of reconciliation and reintegration into a peaceful society if they are willing to abandon violence, break with al-Qaida, and support the constitution.

Just as these problems cannot be solved without the Afghan people, they cannot be solved without the help of Afghanistan’s neighbors. Trafficking in narcotics, the spread of violent extremism, economic stagnation, water management, electrification, and irrigation are regional challenges that require regional solutions.

The United Nations has a central role in this effort to coordinate with the Government of Afghanistan and neighbors in the region to make sure that programs are properly prioritized and well focused. We are committed to working with Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon and UN Special Representative Kai Eide to achieve that goal. The United States Special Representative for Afghanistan and Pakistan, Ambassador Richard Holbrooke, will lead American efforts as we move forward, and we welcome the appointment of special representatives by other countries.

If we are to succeed, we will need the help of all the nations present here. As President Obama has pointed out, “the world cannot afford the price that will come due if Afghanistan slides back into chaos.” While there is great temptation to retreat inward in these difficult economic times, it is precisely at such moments that we must redouble our effort. And as we make commitments and contributions, we must ensure they are flexible enough to respond to immediate needs and evolving opportunities. And we all must be willing to coordinate those efforts together.
The challenge we face is difficult, but the opportunity is clear if we move away from the past. All too often in the past seven years, our efforts have been undermanned, under-resourced and underfunded. This goal is achievable. We know we have made progress where we have made adequate investment and worked together.

The status of Afghanistan’s army, the lives of women and girls, the country’s education and health systems are far better today than they were in 2001. So if all of us represented here work with the government and people of Afghanistan, we will help not only to secure their future, but ours as well.
Now the principal focus of our discussions today is on Afghanistan, but we cannot hope to succeed if those who seek to reestablish a haven for violence and extremism operate from sanctuaries just across the border. For this reason, our partnership with Pakistan is critical. Together, we all must give Pakistan the tools it needs to fight extremists within its borders.
The Obama Administration has made a strong commitment through our support for legislation called the Kerry-Lugar assistance program. And in a few weeks, we will have a chance to join together in Tokyo for a meeting of the Friends of Democratic Pakistan to provide the support that the Pakistani Government and people need. I urge the nations here today in support of Afghanistan to join us in Tokyo on April 17th to help the people of Pakistan.

This effort has already required great sacrifice and it will require more. But in Afghanistan and Pakistan, we face a common threat, a common enemy, and a common task. So let us use today, this conference, to renew and reinvigorate our commitment and our involvement, and to lay a firm foundation for a safer region and a safer world. It is in the interests of all of the people who we represent as we sit around this conference table here in The Hague, and for the kind of world that we wish to help create.
Thank you very much.

Vodpod videos no longer available.

 

Remarks With Dutch Foreign Minister Maxime Verhagen

Remarks

Hillary Rodham Clinton
Secretary of State
The Hague, Netherlands
March 31, 2009

FOREIGN MINISTER VERHAGEN: Madame Secretary, ladies and gentlemen, I want to extend a warm welcome to Secretary Clinton for her visit to the Netherlands, especially because we want to celebrate this year, 400 years of friendship between our two countries. Maybe not in a big tent we are today, but in a place big enough to host all the delegations, all the people who are involved in the future of Afghanistan, and who know that we have a stake in the future of Afghanistan.
The United States and the Netherlands and over 80 other countries and organizations are today meeting in The Hague. We have serious choices to make today. In recent years, NATO and its partners have reduced the threat of terrorists who once found a free haven in Afghanistan and planned attacks on peaceful citizens all over the world. But our work in Afghanistan is still far from done. And Secretary Clinton and I discussed our analyses of the situation and the possible ways forward. And the Netherlands welcomes the outcome of the policy review conducted by the United States.
As the review makes clear, Afghanistan and the region cannot be made safe by military force alone. Diplomacy and development are equally important. Afghan citizens as well as our own citizens need to know what our strategy will be. And I hope today in The Hague, we will start working on a new deal for Afghanistan, a common contract, a new Afghan bond. Achieving respect for human rights, good governance, and social and economic progress are equally important. And I’m sure that the United States and the Netherlands agree that such an Afghan bond must reflect a comprehensive and integrated approach.
In the province of Uruzgan in the south of the country, Dutch diplomats, development workers and military, together with our allies, are learning to do just that. And although the situation is far from irreversible, the number of security incidents is stable and development is picking up. So the Netherlands very much welcomes the American commitment to the training of the Afghan army and police, because this will enable the international community to proceed from implementing to assisting.
In the end, the Afghan people themselves have to be able to provide security and to lead the development of their country. And this conference proves the international community as a whole stays and is wanting to stay committed to the Afghan people.
Madame Secretary, thank you very much and I hope that we will have a very fruitful conference today.
SECRETARY CLINTON: Well, thank you so much, Minister, and I am confident that this conference will make a great difference. And I am very grateful to you personally and to the Dutch Government for making this conference possible in such a short period of time. It was less than a month ago that we first discussed this together in Brussels. And once again, the Dutch Government is at the forefront of the work done on behalf of the global community, and I appreciate that.
You know, as the minister said, Dutch troops are leading the effort in Afghanistan. In Uruzgan Province, as the minister referenced, the success of the policies implemented by the Dutch forces is remarkable. At the center of our efforts is a courageous military commitment by the Dutch people and their government, and it has proven results. It is not a surprise that the three Ds that the Dutch have pursued in their mission in Afghanistan – defense, diplomacy and development – are ones that I personally believe is exactly the right framework.
More than 80 nations and organizations have been brought together here in The Hague. And this conference is critical to our way forward. The Dutch people have played a vital role in advancing security and spreading opportunity far beyond your borders. And this time in particular, our commitment going forward in Afghanistan has great consequences for all of our people, all free people, all people who share the values that the Dutch and the Americans share. I will be speaking later at the conference about the Obama Administration’s strategy for Afghanistan. It is based on collaboration and consultation with our friends and partners.
I looked to the Netherlands not only because of the work that has been done in Afghanistan, but the unsurpassed commitment to fighting poverty and promoting development worldwide. The Netherlands has been a key ally for many decades. The fact that this country is the sixth most generous contributor to international development assistance says volumes about the values of the Dutch people. We will continue to seek your advice and your ideas, your guidance as we work together.
Now the ties between our two countries have a long history. This year, we celebrate the 400th anniversary of Henry Hudson’s legendary voyage which took him from Amsterdam to New Amsterdam. And it marked the beginning of a great chapter in American history and American and Dutch cooperation. I know that the people of New Amsterdam, Minister, a city that is very dear to my heart, have already begun to celebrate this anniversary. I look forward to welcoming you to the United States in a few weeks, where I hope that we can bring even greater attention to the ties that join us and to the values that extend beyond time. And I look forward to many centuries of friendship and partnership between the American and Dutch people.
Thank you very much.
FOREIGN MINISTER VERHAGEN: Thank you.
QUESTION: Madame Secretary (inaudible) after 2010, what do you think can be the role for the Netherlands after that period?
SECRETARY CLINTON: Well, that is, of course, up to the Dutch Government and the Dutch people. But I think the people of the Netherlands should know, certainly from my perspective, the extraordinary contribution and leadership that your mission in Afghanistan has provided. We understand very well the sacrifices, the individual sacrifices as well as the collective ones that such a mission demonstrates. But it has been extraordinarily successful. And in fact, our strategic review is building on many of the ideas and the principles that were brought to bear by the Dutch in Afghanistan. But of course, any decision in the future is up to the people of the Netherlands and their government.
Thank you.

Vodpod videos no longer available.

 

Read Full Post »

Vodpod videos no longer available.

Press Availability after NATO Meeting

Press Availability

Hillary Rodham Clinton
Secretary of State
Brussels, Belgium
March 5, 2009

Date: 03/05/2009 Description: Press Availability by Secretary Clinton after NATO Meeting in Brussels. © NATO Photo

SECRETARY CLINTON: Let me start by saying what a pleasure it is for me to be back here in Brussels again and on my first visit to NATO as Secretary of State. I came here to deliver a clear message: The United States is firmly committed to NATO, and the Obama Administration will work vigorously to renew a real dialogue within this alliance. We look forward to listening, to consulting, and to working in concert to devise and deliver smart solutions to our shared challenges.
As I said to my colleagues, this is not only of great importance to my country and President Obama; it is of great personal importance to me as well. When NATO expanded in the 1990s, I was privileged to visit many new NATO nations as well as longstanding ones. I witnessed firsthand the strength of this alliance, and we in the United States were honored to host the 50th anniversary of NATO.
We’ve had a very productive set of sessions today. Last night at a wonderful dinner hosted by the Belgian foreign minister, I reported to both NATO and EU foreign ministers on my visits to Sharm el-Sheikh, Jerusalem, and Ramallah, and we engaged in a wide-ranging discussion on a number of issues.
Today, we made real progress on key items of our agenda. First, we expressed a unity of purpose with respect to Afghanistan, NATO’s most important ongoing operation. In Afghanistan and in the border regions of Pakistan, we face a common threat, we have a common challenge, and we share a common responsibility.
The United States is working to complete our strategic review of the way forward, and today we found broad agreement on some of the basic elements of a new strategy: first, a regional approach that looks at Afghanistan and Pakistan together; second, increased and integrated civilian and military commitments; third, a strong partnership with the people of Afghanistan to provide security for safe and fair elections in August; next, intensive development efforts to strengthen governance and promote economic opportunities; and finally, a closer relationship working with the people and Government of Pakistan.
Date: 03/05/2009 Description: Press Availability by Secretary Clinton after NATO Meeting in Brussels. © NATO PhotoNow, today was not a pledging conference, but all of the participants recognized the need for increased resources and manpower to meet the challenges we face in the region. Our consultations will continue when Vice President Biden comes here next week to consult with NATO about not only how our strategic review is moving, but to solicit last-minute opinions from all who wish to participate, and to also seek initial responses with respect to individual countries as well as NATO’s future contributions.
We also today had a vigorous discussion about Russia. I thought it was absolutely invigorating to have the kind of true debate that exists among friends and allies over such an important issue. We emerged with greater unity of purpose about how to build a constructive relationship with Russia and a stronger consensus about our relations with the emerging nations of Europe’s east.
While the alliance won’t agree and indeed need not agree on every issue relating to Russia, we can and do agree that we must find ways to work constructively with Russia where we share areas of common interest. We also agree we must find ways to manage our differences with Russia where they persist, and stand firm where our principles or our vital interests are at stake.
NATO today agreed to restart the NATO-Russia Council as a mechanism for dialogue on issues both where we disagree, such as in Georgia, as the Secretary General noted, and a platform for cooperation that is in our interest, like transit to Afghanistan or nonproliferation. Tomorrow in Geneva, I will be meeting with Russian Foreign Minister Lavrov to discuss a wide range of critical matters where we can cooperate and those where we have differences.
Thirdly, today we laid the groundwork for concluding a declaration of alliance security at the NATO summit and for launching a longer-term effort to review NATO’s strategic concept. Our discussions were based on the premise that we can only succeed in dealing with old problems and new threats if we are flexible and pragmatic, but united around our common purpose and principles.
Next month’s summit on the occasion of NATO’s 60th anniversary provides that opportunity not only to reaffirm the values of the North Atlantic Treaty that brought us together, but to ensure that the alliance is equipped to meet the different and diverse challenges of this 21st century.
Let me close by conveying a message from our President. President and Mrs. Obama will visit the United Kingdom, France, Germany, and the Czech Republic between March 31st and April 5th. The President will attend the G-20 summit in London, participate in bilateral programs with French President Sarkozy and German Chancellor Merkel, attend the NATO summit events in Strasbourg and Kehl, travel to Prague where the Czech Government will host leaders of EU member-states and the European Commission president for a special U.S.-EU summit.
President Obama is committed, as I am, to strengthening the transatlantic alliance, to supporting a strong Europe that is a strong partner to the United States, and to energizing our partnerships to confront the common challenges of our time.
Thank you very much and I’d be happy to take some of your questions.
MR. WOOD: The first question will go to Michele Kelemen of National Public Radio.
QUESTION: Thank you, Madame Secretary. NPR and ABC News today are appealing to Iran to release information about this freelancer, Roxana Saberi, who has been imprisoned in Evin prison. I’m wondering what you’ve learned through Swiss intermediaries about this. And you know, what can the State Department really do, given that you have to work through intermediaries in dealing with Iran?
And on a side issue, do you foresee Iran as being part of that conference on Afghanistan that you’re suggesting for later this month?
SECRETARY CLINTON: I am very concerned about this young woman. She is an Iranian-American. She has been living in Iran. She has worked as a journalist, including for NPR. And she has been in prison in Tehran, or elsewhere in Iran, for the last month. We have been working through our intermediaries, the Swiss Government, to request information from the Iranian Government concerning her well-being, her whereabouts, and the charges that are being used to confine her. We have pressed very hard. We will continue to do so.
We believe there is only one outcome to this matter, and that is for her to be released as soon as possible to return home to her family in North Dakota. And we hope and expect that we will receive an affirmative response along those lines from the Iranian Government.
It is frustrating since we do not have any direct contacts with Iran that we must work through intermediaries, but I want to thank the Swiss for the assistance that they have provided us in this and other matters.
I want to extend my deepest concern to her family and her friends, and hope that this matter will be resolved quickly.
With respect to the meeting that we discussed today at the ministerial, we presented the idea of what is being called a big tent meeting with all the parties who have a stake and an interest in Afghanistan. That would obviously include NATO members, ISAF members – many of whom are not NATO members – donors, nations that have regional, strategic, and transit positions vis-à-vis Afghanistan, international organizations.
And we have presented this idea, which is being discussed – nothing has been decided – as a way of bringing all the stakeholders and interested parties together. If we move forward with such a meeting, it is expected that Iran would be invited as a neighbor of Afghanistan.

QUESTION: Madame Secretary, to – about this conference about Afghanistan, I know that you make a link between Afghanistan and Pakistan, speaking of the same problem. Are you afraid that somehow both are going to have the same kind of problems? And the other question is: Why so close visits to NATO – you, and next week, the Vice President? Are you going to express different points of view or —

SECRETARY CLINTON: No. We take this very, very seriously, and it shows our intense commitment not only to NATO and our partnership with NATO, but to our shared commitment with respect to Afghanistan.

Today’s ministerial was an important opportunity for me to represent the United States and express the direction that we are headed in our policy review about Afghanistan and Pakistan. But there wasn’t time, and we knew there wouldn’t be time, for one-on-one meetings with very many of the countries that are here. In fact, we hardly had time to catch a breath today.
We wanted the Vice President to come immediately after my visit to both continue the conversations, which are ongoing, but also to be able to meet in a bilateral way with members, as well as with the NATO leadership, to explore in depth some of the ideas, some of the questions – the potential contributions –that could be put on the table leading up to the summit in April.
I think that the whole question about Afghanistan and Pakistan is one that we’ve given a great deal of thought to. It is clear that the border areas between the two countries are the real locus of a lot of the extremist activity. It’s becoming obvious that Pakistan faces very serious internal threats, and that Afghanistan faces continuing external threats that emanate out of Pakistan.
Last week I met, along with a number of members of our Administration, with delegations from both countries in the first of what will be a continuing trilateral engagement. I believe that both countries recognize that they share common threats, and even common adversaries. The tragic events the other day in Lahore with the attack on the Sri Lanka cricket team, which was a very eerie replica of the attack in Mumbai, demonstrate the ongoing threats that Pakistan faces.
Of course, we know what Afghanistan confronts, so it made sense to us in our country to look at both nations’ concerns together. Because we think that there has to be more cooperation between them, as well as with NATO and others in order to hopefully tackle successfully – on both a military and a civilian strategic basis – the threats that they face that spill over to other countries in a very dangerous way.
MR. WOOD: Next question to Nicholas Kralev of The Washington Times.
QUESTION: Thank you. Madame Secretary, as you know, some of the new NATO members have interpreted your recent overtures to Russia as potentially the U.S. making deals behind their back. I wonder – I know that you’ve been emphasizing that you’ll be consulting before any decisions are made anywhere – in Asia, in Middle East and Europe, everywhere you go. But what did you do today to give assurances to those allies that you will not indeed make any deals over their heads, whether it be with the Lithuanians, the Czechs or the Poles? Thank you.
SECRETARY CLINTON: I think I reiterated that as members of this alliance, we share a common defense commitment – an Article 5 requirement – that we take very seriously. We intend to work with and support all of our NATO allies. We are well aware of the particular concerns that a number of nations in Europe’s east, who have long experience with Russia, have voiced about any kind of dialogue with Russia, whether it be NATO-Russia, the United States-Russia, or any kind of discussion.
I certainly have emphasized, not only today but repeatedly, as have the President, the Vice President, and others that we support the rights of sovereign nations to make their own decisions. As Vice President Biden said in his well-received speech in Munich, the United States will not recognize any nation having a sphere of influence over any other nation.
I reiterated again today – in our meetings with Ukraine and Georgia – the United States’ firm commitment to each of those nations moving toward NATO membership and our equally strong commitment to work with them along with NATO to make clear that they should not be the subject of Russian intimidation or aggression.
But I think – as we decided today after lengthy, thoughtful debate – there are benefits to reenergizing the NATO-Russia Council, just as there are potential benefits for the discussion that I will begin with Foreign Minister Lavrov tomorrow in Geneva. We have areas where we believe we not only can, but must cooperate with Russia – nonproliferation, arms control, antiterrorism, anti-piracy efforts. There are a number of important matters that should be discussed between us and Russia.
There are equally serious matters that we need to not stop talking to Russia about. I don’t think you punish Russia by stopping conversations with them about matters, whether it be the misuse of energy supplies or the failure to comply with the requirements set forth by the OSCE and others concerning their actions in Georgia.
I think that what we have to be is willing to vigorously press the differences that we have while seeking common ground wherever possible. That’s what we intend to do. I believe that our allies understand that. They are well aware that the United States supports them and their national aspirations.
We think that this kind of dialogue with Russia has the potential of easing tensions and solving problems and we pursue it with our eyes wide open. We are certainly not in any way speaking for any other nation whose sovereignty and territorial integrity we respect. We also intend to stand firmly behind our values and principles. That’s our position and that’s how we will proceed.
MR. WOOD: We’ll take the last question right here. Sir, could you identify yourself? Just wait for the microphone.
QUESTION: Yes, Pravo daily newspaper, the Czech Republic. To the missile defense, there were some controversies over the letter President Obama sent to President Medvedev. Will you have any clarification tomorrow with – dealing with Secretary Lavrov on this issue?
SECRETARY CLINTON: Let me clarify, as I have said before, what has been a constant theme both by myself and the President and other members of our Administration. We applaud the decisions by the people of the Czech Republic and their government – as well as the people and Government of Poland – for proceeding with missile defense on their soil. And the reason for that is it has always been the American position that missile defense is primarily aimed at a nation like Iran or networks of terrorists that could obtain deliverable nuclear or conventional or biological or chemical weapons, and the missiles to use that.
Our discussion about missile defense is aimed at determining its feasibility economically, technologically, and we will continue to explore it with our allies. We’ve made the case to Russia time and again, and I will make it once more tomorrow in Geneva, that Europe has a right to defend itself from the new threats of the 21st century. We happen to believe in the United States that those threats in the future are more likely to come from regimes and terrorist networks than from nation-states in the immediate vicinity.
Therefore, we want to help Europe be prepared and that’s why what Poland and the Czech Republic have done sets the stage for what will be strategic decisions going forward. I know that there’s an ongoing debate about what the status of Iran’s nuclear weapons production capacity is, but I don’t think there is a credible debate about their intention. Our task is to dissuade them, deter them, prevent them from acquiring a nuclear weapon, which given the range of the missiles they currently have access to threatens Europe and Arab neighbors in the Gulf, not the United States.
We will also raise with Russia their continuing discussions with Iran about selling longer-range missiles, which we think are a threat to Russia as well as to Europe and neighbors in the region. We see this in a broader perspective than it’s usually described, and we have long offered Russia the opportunity to work with us on missile defense. We actually think that missile defense is a very important tool in our defensive arsenal for the future, because there is unfortunately a great deal of proliferation of weapons of all kinds. We pick up the newspaper and read of a nation testing a chemical weapon. We pick up another paper and read about the continuing desire of terrorist groups to obtain such weapons.
Just as we had a defensive posture against the old Soviet Union in the 20th century, we must now have a defensive posture against the new threats of the 21st century. Therefore, the Czech Republic and Poland –in our view –have been very visionary in looking over the horizon about what we have to be prepared for if we’re not successful in preventing the acquisition and proliferation of these weapons of mass destruction.
On that happy note, let me again express my appreciation to NATO for organizing this meeting, my pleasure to representing my country and our new Administration in attending it, and my anticipation looking toward the summit and the work that lies ahead.
Thank you all very much.
MR. WOOD: Thank you all.

Read Full Post »

« Newer Posts

%d bloggers like this: