Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Posts Tagged ‘South Korea’

Well we now have official word from P.J. Crowley in today’s press briefing.

Philip J. Crowley
Assistant Secretary
Daily Press Briefing
Washington, DC
May 18, 2010
Secretary of State Clinton will travel to Japan, China, and Korea, departing Washington, D.C., on May 20th. She will visit Tokyo on May 21st; Shanghai on May 21st and 22nd; Beijing, May 23rd through May 26th; and will conclude her travel in Seoul also on May 26th.
In Tokyo, she will discuss regional and global issues with our Japanese ally.
In Shanghai, she will visit the 2010 Shanghai Expo and attend a dinner in honor of the U.S. Pavilion sponsors. She’ll participate in a commercial diplomacy event to highlight the importance of U.S. market access and job creation.
In Beijing, she will join Secretary of Treasury Tim Geithner and over a dozen U.S. cabinet members and agency heads as part of the U.S. delegation to the second joint meeting of the U.S.-China Strategic and Economic Dialogue together with her respective co-chairs State Councilor Dai and Vice Premier Wang.
On May 25, she will participate in an event to celebrate people-to-people engagement with State Councilor Liu. And on May 26th, she finishes in the Republic of Korea, where she will meet with senior government officials to discuss regional stability and other issues. And tomorrow morning at 11:45, we’ll have a trip briefing here at State featuring Kurt Campbell and Dave Loevinger from the Department of Treasury.

Read Full Post »

Today, at the Korean War Memorial in Washington, D.C., Secretary Clinton joined South Korean President Lee Myung-Bak to commemorate the 60th anniversary of the Korean War. Here is a slideshow of the wreath-laying ceremony. It was a beautiful day, today, commemorating a devastating and sad period in Korean and U.S. history.

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

Read Full Post »

Daily Appointments Schedule for April 12, 2010

Washington, DC
April 12, 2010

SECRETARY OF STATE CLINTON

8:00 a.m.
Secretary Clinton attends a Meeting, at the White House.

(MEDIA TO BE DETERMINED BY WHITE HOUSE)

9:30 a.m. Secretary Clinton participates in a Wreath Laying Ceremony with Korean President Lee Myung-bak on the 60th Anniversary of the Korean War, at the Korean War Memorial.
(OPEN PRESS COVERAGE)

10:45 a.m. Secretary Clinton attends President Obama’s Bilateral Meeting with Jordanian King Abdullah II, at the Washington Convention Center.
(MEDIA TO BE DETERMINED BY WHITE HOUSE)

11:45 a.m. Secretary Clinton attends President Obama’s Bilateral Meeting with Malaysian Prime Minister Mohammah Najib Abdoul Razak, at the Washington Convention Center.
(MEDIA TO BE DETERMINED BY WHITE HOUSE)

12:55 p.m. Secretary Clinton attends President Obama’s Bilateral Meeting with Ukrainian President Viktor Yushchenko, at the Washington Convention Center.
(MEDIA TO BE DETERMINED BY WHITE HOUSE)

1:30 p.m. Secretary Clinton attends President Obama’s Bilateral Meeting with Armenian President Serzh Sargsian, at the Washington Convention Center.
(MEDIA TO BE DETERMINED BY WHITE HOUSE)

2:30 p.m. Secretary Clinton attends President Obama’s Bilateral Meeting with Chinese President Hu Jintao, at the Washington Convention Center.
(MEDIA TO BE DETERMINED BY WHITE HOUSE)

4:15 p.m. Secretary Clinton holds a Bilateral Meeting with UN Secretary General Ban Ki Moon, at the Department of State.
(CAMERA SPRAY PRECEDING BILATERAL MEETING)

6:00 p.m. Secretary Clinton hosts a Reception in Honor of the Foundation for Art and Preservation in Embassies and presents the Leonore and Walter Annenberg Award for Diplomacy through the Arts to New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg, at the Department of State.
(CLOSED PRESS COVERAGE)

7:00 p.m. Secretary Clinton and Secretary of Energy Steven Chu host a Dinner for Nuclear Security Summit Delegation Members, at the Washington Convention Center.
(CLOSED PRESS COVERAGE)

Read Full Post »

Getty Images
US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton holds a bilateral meeting with Yu Myung-hwan, South Korean Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade in New York on September 21, 2009.

The Secretary of State had an especially busy day, but the information and photos are seeping out slowly. This was around lunch time.

Read Full Post »

The U.S. and South Korea Working Together on Regional and Global Issues

Remarks

Hillary Rodham Clinton
Secretary of State, Secretary of State
Remarks With South Korean Foreign Minister Yu
Seoul, South Korea
February 20, 2009

FOREIGN MINISTER YU: (Via interpreter) – Good morning, everyone. I am delighted to welcome Secretary Clinton, who is here visiting Korea on her first overseas trip as the Secretary of State. Today, Secretary Clinton and I shared the view that the ROK-U.S. alliance is a cornerstone for peace and stability on the Korean Peninsula and in Northeast Asia and reaffirmed its importance.
As such, in order to aptly address the new security environment and needs of the 21st century, our two sides agreed to work together to further develop our alliance into a future-oriented strategic alliance based on our common values of democracy, human rights, and the market economy. We also have a common view that alliance readjustment projects will lay an important foundation for the further development of our future-oriented alliance and agree to closely cooperate with each other for the successful implementation of these projects.
Secretary Clinton and I also had in-depth discussions on North Korea and the North Korean nuclear issue. We reaffirmed that the Republic of Korea and the United States will not tolerate North Korea’s nuclear ambitions under any circumstances. We also reaffirmed our commitment to pursue the complete and verifiable denuclearization of North Korea through the Six-Party Talks on the basis of close coordination between Korea and the U.S. And we agreed to strengthen cooperation with the other participating countries of the Six-Party Talks as well.
Secretary Clinton and I concurred that North Korea’s recent behavior of refusing inter-Korean dialogue and attempting to heighten tensions is impairing the stability on the Korean Peninsula and the Northeast Asian region. We urge North Korea to halt such provocative actions and expeditiously resume inter-Korean talks without any preconditions. Secretary Clinton and I agreed that our two countries should continue to work closely together to overcome the global financial crisis faced by the international community, and also to prevent trade protectionism. In this regard, our two countries will exert joint efforts to ensure the success of the upcoming G-20 Summit meeting in London in April.
In addition, with regard to the Korea-U.S. Free Trade Agreement, we shared the view that the FTA will strengthen Korea-U.S. ties overall and agreed to work together to move forward on this matter. Furthermore, we agreed to continue our cooperation for the success of the negotiations on climate change. The two of us shared the view that the stability and reconstruction of Afghanistan are crucial for the global peace and stability and agree to continue to work together to this end.
In this regard, our side explained our intentions for additional contributions to Afghanistan and the joint assistant projects being pursued by Korea and Japan. The U.S. side welcomed and expressed its appreciation for Korea’s continued participation in the combined efforts of the international community. In addition, our side explained plans to dispatch a Navy vessel to the waters of Somalia where it will take part in the international efforts to ensure maritime safety and to counter terrorism.
Secretary Clinton and I are of the view that it would be desirable to hold a bilateral summit meeting at an early date in order to strengthen our cooperation on further developing our alliance and on major global issues such as the global financial crisis, and we agreed to work together on this. This Foreign Ministers’ meeting has been a very meaningful occasion, where Korea and the U.S. have further strengthened our policy coordination and cooperation through wide-ranging discussions on major issues and matters of interest. Thank you.
MODERATOR: (Via interpreter) Next, Secretary Clinton.
SECRETARY CLINTON: Thank you very much, Foreign Minister Yu, for your hospitality and for such a productive meeting today.
I am very pleased to be back in the Republic of Korea on my first overseas visit as Secretary of State. I have very fond memories of the time I spent here as First Lady, and I hold great hopes for the future of our partnership. Because it is more than just a regional partnership; it is becoming a global strategic alliance that rests upon shared commitments and common values – democracy, human rights, market economies, and the pursuit of peace. And it concerns more than simply the dealings between our two nations. Our partnership has already begun to look outward at the wide array of challenges and opportunities we face around the world, and will do so increasingly in the years to come.
Let me begin with one of the most pressing of those challenges, the global financial crisis, which has hit both of our countries hard. We are taking steps, here in Korea as well as in the United States, to spur growth, create jobs, save family homes, and improve our financial architecture. And we are both conscious of our responsibility as members of the G-20 to help coordinate an effective global response.
Minister, you and I discussed a path forward toward a shared solution to these challenges, and we look forward to our Presidents’ Meeting around the G-20 in London. We also talked about the way to work together to expand trade so that it benefits both of our countries, and I appreciate the ongoing commitment by the Republic of Korea to our mission in Afghanistan, to the protection of our sea lanes from piracy, and to the commitment to work together on global climate change. So we will draw together upon our partnership to address a range of issues. And it will be important that as we do so, we rest upon the very firm foundation of our alliance.
I want to take a moment to pay tribute to the late Cardinal Kim. He was a great spiritual leader not only for Korea and the people of Korea, but for the world. And I know that he will be remembered by Koreans and all who cared about democracy, human rights, and human dignity.
Now the Republic of Korea’s achievement of democracy and prosperity stands in stark contrast to the tyranny and poverty across the border to the North. I commend the people of South Korea and your leaders for your calm resolve and determination in the face of the provocative and unhelpful statements and actions by the North. There is no issue on which we are more united than North Korea. We maintain our joint resolve to work together and through the Six-Party Talks to bring about the complete and verifiable denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula.
We firmly believe that North Korea must live up to the commitments it made in the 2006 Joint Statement and other agreements. North Korea is not going to get a different relationship with the United States while insulting and refusing dialogue with the Republic of Korea. Achieving these goals will take hard work and strong leadership. Assistant Secretary Chris Hill, who has served as our chief negotiator in the Six-Party Talks, is here with me today, and he supplied a great deal of dedication in the years that he served in this position. And he has graciously agreed to continue serving our country by moving on to another challenging assignment.
So I am pleased to announce, after consulting with our partners in the Six-Party Talks, the appointment of Ambassador Stephen Bosworth as Special Representative for North Korea Policy. Ambassador Bosworth will be our senior official handling North Korea issues, reporting to me as well as to President Obama. And while President Obama obviously cannot be with us here today, I know that this appointment is of great importance to him.
North Korean behavior presents a number of important foreign policy challenges for the United States, the region, and the world. So we need a capable and experienced diplomat to lead our efforts to stem the risks of North Korea’s nuclear ambitions and the proliferation of sensitive weapons technology, and its human rights and humanitarian challenges. Ambassador Bosworth is up to the task of working with our allies and partners to convince North Korea to become a constructive part of the international community rather than a threat to its neighbors.
As our senior official handling North Korean issues, he will serve as our senior emissary for U.S. engagement with North Korea in close consultation. Special Envoy for the Six-Party Talks, Ambassador Sung Kim, will work closely with Ambassador Bosworth and continue to lead our day-to-day efforts, including maintaining constant contact with our allies and the Six-Party partners.
Ambassador Bosworth is currently the Dean of the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University. Having served as an ambassador three times, including to the Republic of Korea, he is an experienced envoy, able to interact with officials at the highest levels of foreign governments. And we believe his involvement will facilitate the high-level engagement with the North Koreans and our other partners.
Now, there is no doubt that Ambassador Bosworth will have his work cut out for him. But based on our very productive discussion today, both Minister Yu and myself will stand with our envoys and representatives as they begin once again to try to convince the North Koreans to begin a process within the Six-Party talks toward the complete and verifiable elimination of nuclear weapons.
So, Minister Yu, thank you once again, and thanks to your great country for our friendship and our partnership and for the continuing and increasing work that we will do together in the years ahead.
QUESTION: (Via interpreter) Hello, I am from CBS, (inaudible). First, my question goes to Mr. Yu. The North is showing movement to test-launch its missiles. Have there been discussions between the U.S. and Korea to – against this issue? If there have been, what have you discussed?
I’ll also give a second question to Secretary Clinton. Do you think that the test missile issue should be included on the Six-Party Talks?
FOREIGN MINISTER YU: (Via interpreter) Yes, regarding the long-term missile issue, because North Korea is developing nuclear weapons, we do have some concerns. And regarding this, the U.S. and Korea have decided to work together based upon our coordination, also work with other related countries.
If North Korea should launch a missile, even if it is a satellite, we think that this is a clear breach of UN Security Council Resolution 1718. Thank you.
SECRETARY CLINTON: We are aware of press reports that North Korea may be preparing to conduct a missile test. We don’t comment on intelligence matters, but it is clear that under the United Nations Security Council Resolution 1718, North Korea is required to suspend all activities related to its ballistic missile program. The North should refrain from violating this resolution and also from any and all provocative actions that could harm the Six-Party Talks and aggravate tensions in the region.
As we work together with our partners in the Six-Party process, we will be discussing what ways we can best approach North Korea so that we present a united front with respect to all of the issues that are of concern. But the most immediate issue is to continue the disablement of their nuclear facilities and to get a complete and verifiable agreement as to the end of their nuclear program.
MR. WOOD: Next question to Paul Richter of L.A. Times.
QUESTION: Yes. Minister Yu, Secretary Clinton spoke candidly yesterday about growing concerns that a succession crisis in the North will cause new difficulties in dealing with Pyongyang. I wonder if you share that view.
And Secretary Clinton, do have any concern now that the topic that you candidly raised yesterday might provoke a negative reaction from the North?
FOREIGN MINISTER YU: (Via interpreter) Regarding Korean relations and the North Korean issue, I’d like to say that this is one of the top priorities that we have between Korea and the U.S., and we have much interest in this. Therefore, we have our eye on the situation.
MODERATOR: Next is (inaudible) from Yonhap News.
QUESTION: (Via interpreter) Hello, I am (inaudible) from Yonhap. My question is to Secretary Clinton. First of all, regarding the assistance to Afghanistan, do you wish that Korea would join board to provide military assistance, or do you think it’s enough that Korea can take part on civilian (inaudible) by expanding maybe police forces? Also, yesterday you voiced your concerns over the succession crisis in North Korea. Do you have any – is there any particular intention behind that kind of expression of concern at this kind of time, and do you have any concerns regarding his health – that is, Kim Jong-il?
SECRETARY CLINTON: With respect to Afghanistan, we know that the Korean Government understands the importance of stabilizing and reconstructing Afghanistan – that we all have a vital interest in bringing peace to that region. And we’re very pleased that the ROK and Japan together have announced some joint projects as well as the Korean Government’s commitment to police training and other important work. We will continue to consult with the Korean Government as we go forward with our policy review.
With respect to your second question, there is a broad range of issues, as Minister Yu said, that we are always following. But it is clear as we meet here today we are dealing with the government that exists right now. And we intend to reach out together with our partners in the Six-Party Talks to engage that government and to look for ways that we can bring them back into discussion through the Six-Party process. So it’s very clear that, as Minister Yu said, when you are thinking about the future dealings with a government that doesn’t have any clear succession – they don’t have a vice president, they don’t have a prime minister – that it is something you have to think about. But for the purposes of what we are planning today, it is to deal with the government that exists, the leadership that exists, and to look for ways to involve them in the Six-Party Talks once again.
MR. WOOD: Last question to Wyatt Andrews of CBS News.
QUESTION: Madame Secretary, I’m going to repeat Paul’s question. Do you have any concerns your candid discussion yesterday about a possible succession situation in North Korea might provoke an additional response from the North Korean Government?
SECRETARY CLINTON: No, I do not, because I think that all one has to do is read the press. The open press is filled with such conversations. This is not some kind of a classified matter that is not being discussed in many circles.
But for me, as we look at planning and contingency planning, we are taking everything into account. But we deal with the government that’s in place right now, and that government is being asked to re-engage with the Six-Party Talks to fulfill the obligations that they entered into, and we expect them to do so. And at the same time, we are calling on the Government of North Korea to refrain from the kind of provocative and unhelpful war of words that it has been engaged in because that is not very fruitful. So clearly, we are looking to the existing leadership to be responsive to our desire to have them engage with the Six-Party Talks again.
MODERATOR: With that, we’d like to conclude the joint conference between the Ministers. Thank you very much for your participation.

400,http _d.yimg.com_a_p_afp_20090220_capt.photo_1235101121003-6-0 400,http _d.yimg.com_a_p_afp_20090220_capt.photo_1235142450964-1-0 400,http _d.yimg.com_a_p_nm_20090220_2009_02_19t233835_450x353_us_korea_clinton

Read Full Post »

Town Hall at EWHA Women’s University

Remarks

Hillary Rodham Clinton
Secretary of State, Secretary of State
Town Hall Meeting at Ewha Women’s University
Seoul, South Korea
February 20, 2009

SECRETARY CLINTON: Good afternoon. (cheers and applause) Thank you so much, President Lee. I am honored to be here at this great university. I wish to thank also Chairperson (inaudible) and the more than 107,000 alumni at this great school. Standing up with me was our Ambassador Kathy Stephens, who has told me that more than 50 graduates of Ewha Womans University work at U.S. Embassy Seoul. We are extremely proud of the education they have received here.
It is a great privilege to stand here before you on the stage of the largest women’s university in the world. And I came to – (applause) – this university as a matter of destiny, because you see, Ewha and I share a connection. (Cheers and applause.) I am a Methodist, my family on my father’s side comes from Scranton, Pennsylvania – (applause) – and I must say that Wellesley College is a sister college for Ewha University. (Applause.) So being an honorary fellow seems right at home today.
I also note that in this audience are some Korean-American friends from New York and California. There are several Wellesley graduates whom I met backstage as well – (applause) – and an extraordinary number of talented young women, faculty members, and administrators.
Learning about this great university and the role that you have played in advancing the status of women made me think about so many of the women throughout history who are inspirations to me: Madame Scranton, someone who started teaching one young woman, and from her dedication and hard work came this university; Eleanor Roosevelt, a pioneering First Lady of the United States and a voice for democracy around the world, and one of the driving forces behind the United Nations Declaration on Human Rights. Now, that was more than 50 years ago, but just a few weeks ago, one of Korea’s most accomplished leaders, United Nations Secretary General Ban Ki-moon, called on all nations worldwide to push for more progress on women’s equality. And I want to thank the Secretary General – (applause) – because he said that women’s empowerment is the key to progress in developing nations.
People who think hard about our future come to the same conclusion, that women and others on society’s margins must be afforded the right to fully participate in society, not only because it is morally right, but because it is necessary to strengthen our security and prosperity.
Before I came out on stage, I met a number of young women who are in political office here in the Republic of Korea, and I hope I was looking at a future president of this great nation. (Applause.)
As you think about your own futures, keeping in mind security and prosperity and the role that each of us must play, is essential because of the urgent global challenges we face in the 21st century. We need all of our people’s talents to be on the very forefront of setting a course of peace, progress, and prosperity; be it defending our nations from the threat of nuclear proliferation and terror, or resolving the global climate crisis or the current economic crisis, and promoting civil society, especially women’s rights and education, healthcare, clean energy, good governance, the rule of law, and free and fair elections. All of these matters speak to our common desire to make a nation that is safe and strong and secure.
More than half a century ago, this university became the first to prepare women for professions that were formerly reserved for men, including medicine, law, science, and journalism. At about the same time, your government wrote women’s equality into your constitution and guaranteed protections for women in employment. And there have been other rights and protections for women encoded in Korean law in subsequent decades.
These advances coincided with Korea’s transformation from an undeveloped nation to a dynamic democracy, a global economic power, and a hub of technology and innovation. The inclusion of women in the political and economic equation, calling on those talents and contributions from the entire population, not just the male half, was essential to the progress that this country has made.
As I have been on this first trip as Secretary of State, I have visited Japan and Indonesia, and tomorrow I will be in China. I was very impressed by my visit to Indonesia, a young democracy that is demonstrating to the world that democracy, Islam, modernity, and women’s rights can coexist. I met elected women officials. I met high appointed members in the foreign ministry and other cabinet positions in the government. It would be hard to imagine the progress that Indonesia has made in the last ten years, moving from a stagnant autocracy to a burgeoning democracy, without women being part of the reason.
And on Sunday, I’ll meet with women in China to hear about their efforts to improve opportunities for themselves in their own country, another reason why women have to lead the way if there’s going to be higher standards of living, a healthier population, and an actively engaged citizenry.
But no country has yet achieved full equality for women. We still have work to do, don’t we? And just a few weeks ago, President Obama signed into law a new provision protecting women from salary discrimination, a step that was overdue. So there is a lot ahead of us to ensure that gender equality, as President Lee mentioned, becomes a reality. And we also need to remain vigilant against a backlash that tries to turn the clock back on women and human rights, countries where leaders are threatened by the idea of freedom and democracy and women are made the scapegoats. The abuses of women under the Taliban are horrific reminders that just as women had been central to progress in countries like ours, the reverse can happen as well.
Some of you may have seen the news reports some weeks ago of young girls in Afghanistan who were so eager to go to school, and every day they went off with a real light in their eyes because they were finally able to learn. And one day, a group of these young girls were assaulted by a group of Taliban men who threw acid on them because they had the desire to learn. We have to remain vigilant on behalf of women’s rights.
We see this kind of suppression in different forms in different places. In Burma, the valor of Aung San Suu Kyi, who won the Nobel Peace Prize for her courageous struggle for freedom of expression and conscience. To the North, 70 percent of those leaving North Korea in search of a better life are women, a sad commentary on the conditions in their own country.
So part of my message during this trip and part of my mission as Secretary of State is that the United States is committed to advancing the rights of women to lead more equitable, prosperous lives in safe societies. I view this not only as a moral issue, but as a security issue. I think that it’s imperative that nations like ours stand up for the rights of women. It is not ancillary to our progress; it is central.
In 1995, when I went to the United Nations Conference on Women in Beijing and said that women’s rights were human rights, and human rights were women’s rights, people were so excited. But that to me was almost a sad commentary that we had to say something so obvious toward the end of the 20th century.
So here we are in the 21st century, and every day we make progress, but we can’t be complacent. We have to highlight the importance of inclusion for women. We have to make clear that no democracy can exist without women’s full participation; no economy can be truly a free market without women involved.
I want to use robust diplomacy and development to strengthen our partnerships with other governments and create collaborative networks of people and nongovernmental organizations to find innovative solutions to global problems – what we call smart power.
Today, I’ve come to this great women’s university to hear your thoughts about the future. The other night in Tokyo, I had the privilege to listen to students at Tokyo University, and I came away not only impressed by their intelligence and the quality of their questions, but encouraged by their concern about the future that lay ahead and what each of them wanted to do to make it better.
Today, I’ve held bilateral meetings with your president, your prime minister, and your foreign minister. We have discussed issues like the need to continue the Six-Party Talks to bring about the complete and verifiable denuclearization in North Korea, and how we can better coordinate not only between ourselves, but regionally and globally, on the range of issues that confront us. But in each meeting, we took time to reflect about how far this country has come.
Back in the early 1960s, there were a series of studies done where different groups were looking at nations around the world, trying to calculate which ones would be successful at the end of the 20th century. And many commentators and analysts thought that the chances for the Republic of Korea were limited. But that wasn’t the opinion of the people of Korea. And so for 50 years, you have built a nation that is now assuming a place of leadership in the world, respected for the vibrant democracy, for the advances across the board in every walk of life. And it is a tribute to your understanding of what it takes to make progress at a time of peril and uncertainty.
The relationship between the United States and Korea is deep and enduring, and it is indispensible to our shared security. Without security, children can’t even imagine their futures and may not have the potential to actually live up to their talents. Our two countries have joined together as a force for peace, prosperity, and progress. Korean and American soldiers have served shoulder-to-shoulder in so many places around the world.
We know that the most acute challenge to stability and security in Northeast Asia is the regime in North Korea, and particularly its nuclear program. It bears repeating that President Obama and I are committed to working through the Six-Party Talks. We believe we have an opportunity to move those forward and that it is incumbent upon North Korea to avoid provocative actions and unhelpful rhetoric toward the people and the leaders of the Republic of Korea. Remember that the North Korean Government committed to abandoning all nuclear weapons and returning at an early date to the Treaty of Nonproliferation of Nuclear Weapons.
And I make the offer again right here in Seoul: If North Korea is genuinely prepared to completely and verifiably eliminate their nuclear weapons program, the Obama Administration will be willing to normalize bilateral relations, replace the peninsula’s longstanding armistice agreement with a permanent peace treaty, and assist in meeting the energy and other economic and humanitarian needs of the Korean people.
Also essential to our shared security and prosperity is a resolution to the global economic crisis. Korea and the United States have both benefited from a strong economic relationship, and your leaders and I today discussed ways we can develop that relationship further. We are going to work on a vision of a much more comprehensive strategic relationship. We want more partnerships to bring not just government leaders together, but business and professional and academic and political and people-to-people. We want to work with Korea so that both of us will be leaders in getting at the root causes of global climate change and vigorously pursuing a clean energy agenda. And I applaud your country for being a global leader in this area, and for calling on the ingenuity and skills of the Korean people to promote green technologies that will create jobs and protect our planet and enhance our security.
Students here at Ewha have a long and proud tradition of engagement with the world. And you have the talent and the training to help shape that world. It may not be always obvious what you can do to make a difference, so do what you love. Do what gives you meaning. Do what makes life purposeful for you. And make a contribution.
I don’t know that Mary Scranton, who founded this university teaching one student in her home, could have ever dreamed of where we would be today. But that’s often the way life is. I never could have dreamed that I could be here as the Secretary of State of the United States either. (Applause.) You have to be willing to prepare yourselves and as you are doing to take advantage of the opportunities that arise, to find cooperative ways to work with others to promote the common good, and then follow your dreams. You may not end up exactly where you started out heading toward, but with your education and with the opportunities now available in your country, there is so much that you can do. And I know that you will be well-equipped to make your contribution that will contribute to the peace and prosperity and progress and security, not only of Korea, but of the region and the world that needs and is waiting for your talents.
Thank you all and God bless you. (Applause.)
And now we’re going to have some questions, I think, right? (Laughter.)
MODERATOR: (In Korean.)
SECRETARY CLINTON: Oh, so many hands. (Laughter.) Yes, right there. Here comes a microphone.
QUESTION: Good afternoon, Madame Secretary. Welcome to Korea and welcome to Ewha Women’s University. It’s an honor to have you here with us today. I’ve read your biography before and you mentioned that you were once interested in for working for NASA. If you had not gone to law school and if you had not pursued your current career as Secretary of State, where and as who would you picture yourself now? Thank you.
SECRETARY CLINTON: Well, that’s a – (laughter) – that’s a hard question. Now, there is an astronaut here. Where is she? Where’s my astronaut that I met? There she is. There she is right there. (Applause.) I told her when I met her – (cheers and applause) – my dream was to be an astronaut when I was about 13 or 14 years old and the United States was starting its space program. So I wrote a letter to the NASA space agency and asked how I could become an astronaut. (Laughter.) And I got a letter back saying that they weren’t accepting women. (Chorus of boos, laughter, applause.)
Now, I have to be very honest with you. I could never have qualified. (Laughter.) But it was a dream, and I have been thrilled to see young women follow that dream and do so with such skill.
Now, it’s hard to think about what I would have done, because I have taken a path that has been very satisfying to me. But there are so many paths that can be. When I was younger, I went from wanting to be an astronaut to wanting to be a journalist to wanting to be a doctor. I had so many different ideas in mind.
But I did become a lawyer, and I initially used my legal education on behalf of children. I worked for something called the Children’s Defense Fund. And I was particularly concerned about children who were abused or neglected or deprived in some way, and that was very important work to me. I also taught law and I practiced law. If you had asked me 20 years ago, would I ever run for office, I would have said no. I was very proud of my husband’s work, but I never thought that I would do that. I was satisfied being a lawyer and working as an advocate, particularly for children.
But when I was asked to consider running for office, I thought hard about it, and I will tell you the story about why I decided to do it. I had been a lawyer, I had been a law professor, I had been an advocate, I had been a First Lady of the United States because of my husband’s presidency – (laughter) – and that was a wonderful experience serving my country. So in 1998, at the end of that year, the Senator from New York, Senator Moynihan, decided to retire. And people in New York started asking me if I would run for the Senate. And I said no, no, of course not, I won’t do that that makes no sense to me. And they kept asking and they kept asking, and I kept saying no. And they were very persistent. (Laughter.) And I have to tell you a little secret. Some of it was because they couldn’t find anybody else to do it. (Laughter.)
And I was at an event in New York City as First Lady promoting women in sports, because I’m not a very good athlete, but I’ve always loved sports and I’ve played volleyball and softball and tennis. And so I’ve always thought that having young women involved in sports was very good. And there was a banner behind me which said “Dare to Compete.” That was the name of the special on women in sports. So this young woman, the basketball captain of this high school, introduced me. And she was much taller than me. (Laughter.) So she finished introducing me, and I went up to shake her hand and thank her, and she leaned over and she said, “Dare to compete, Mrs. Clinton. Dare to compete.” (Laughter.)
And I pass that on to you because sometimes you have to be willing to take a risk. And running for office, which I had never done before, and I’m – looking back on it now, not even sure how I did it, because it was quite challenging, was something that I am very happy I ended up doing, even though it was hard. And then when I ran for president, that was really hard. (Laughter.) But I learned so much and I had such an extraordinary experience. So it’s difficult for me to sort of run back through my mind and think of any other path, because this is the life that I’ve both lived and chosen.
Now, when President Obama asked me to be Secretary of State, I was really surprised. And I had to think very hard about that because I loved being a Senator from New York. But I concluded that working with President Obama on behalf of my country at this time was important. And so I said yes. And look where I get to come; I get to come to Ewha and see all of you. (Cheers and Applause.)
Out here somewhere. I see there’s a hand. There’s a hand right there that I think the microphone can get to. Yes, okay.
QUESTION: I’m currently studying English language and literature. (Inaudible), and I saw that you are one of the most influential leader in the world, and I think you also have some obstacles in coming to where you are today. So my question is that how have you realized these experiences to become (inaudible), especially now as Secretary of State? Thank you very much. (Applause.)
SECRETARY CLINTON: Thank you. Well, I have been fortunate because I’ve had a very strong family and a very strong faith and very good friends. And so no matter what happens in your life, whatever obstacles you may encounter, you’re very fortunate if you have people who will support you and if you have a faith that will sustain you. And that has been my personal experience.
I think that every life faces challenges. No one escapes without difficulties. The real question is: How do you respond? And we all know people who are just amazing the way they can overcome obstacles, and we know other people who just seem to give up. And I don’t know all the reasons why that happens in a life, but I do know that being a good friend to someone in need and supporting people who are going through a hard time is very important.
One of the phrases that I keep in mind is “the discipline of gratitude.” No matter how difficult a day can be or a problem may be, find something to be grateful for every day. Today on my way to the meetings with the foreign minister and the president and the prime minister, I saw flowers everywhere. (Laughter and Applause.) And it was so wonderful to see. And walking in the foreign ministry building, I saw, pots of flowers being nurtured – (laughter) – so that they will spring forth and see blossoms already there. And so although it’s cold outside – (laughter) – I was very grateful that people have thought enough about the symbols of hope and spring that flowers bring, and that there they were for us to enjoy.
So I think that it is just a question of what you decide inside yourself and how you determine you’ll meet whatever obstacle life throws your way. And I wish all of you friends and family and faith and all the other sources of strength that can make a difference for you, and to be grateful for something every single day no matter how hard it looks. (Applause.)
Yes. Here comes the microphone.
QUESTION: Madame Secretary, you look stunning today. I’m a junior in English literature. My question is, in Korea, (inaudible) is also in progress, but the word (inaudible). So do you think this is the right time to bring Korean innovation, and what’s the outlook for the success?
SECRETARY CLINTON: Great question. (Laughter.) And we talked a lot about that in our meetings today. Your president has talked about low-carbon green growth. We talk about it – a Green New Deal. We talk about clean technology and energy efficiency. I think we have to do it now, and I also believe that despite the difficult economy, there are opportunities for new jobs that will help to grow the economy into recovery.
Now, this is going to be one of the most important issues for the Obama Administration, and we are looking to partner with your country and others, because the problem of global climate change and the increasing effects of this on our environment and on our health is costing us money. We’ve done some studies in the United States that breathing the emissions that come from coal-fired power plants and from exhaust from tailpipes of vehicles makes people sick. It creates asthmatic conditions and other health problems. We know that we will have increasing droughts and other problems in the world because of what’s happening.
So you know all of this. You’re studying it. You see it. The real question is: Do the people of the world, and particularly the leaders of the world, have the will to help lead us in a new direction?
Now, what we have tried to do with our stimulus package to try to get our economy growing again is to put money into that package that will incentivize different energy choices. So there will be money for retrofitting buildings so they’ll be more energy efficient, money to enhance the development of cleaner energy appliances and vehicles. We’re trying to change behaviors while we change the economy.
Now, for some countries, that will be harder than for other countries, which is why the United States must lead. And I’m very proud that President Obama has made a total u-turn away from the policies of the past eight years. We cannot deny or ignore the global climate change problem. The question is: How do we effectively address it so that we don’t cause more economic dislocation?
And I think if we’re smart enough and we work together and we don’t get discouraged, we will see progress this year leading up to the Copenhagen conference at the end of the year. On this trip, for example, I brought with me the Special Envoy for Climate Change that President Obama and I appointed, Todd Stern, so that he could meet with the people in your government and the Japanese and the Indonesian and the Chinese government who are working on climate change.
So yes, we have some serious problems in the economy as it is trying to recover from this global contraction, but we can’t postpone dealing with global climate change. So let’s be smart; let’s be ingenious and innovative. When you think about what this country has accomplished in the last 50 years, think of what you could do leading the world in global climate change and clean technology and science in the next 50 years.
And we’re going to do our part in the United States. We’re going to try to get our own domestic policy right, pass it, begin to deal with a cap-and-trade and other approaches to controlling emissions in our own country. I’m going to have a series of talks with the Chinese Government, because last year China surpassed the United States as the largest emitter of greenhouse gas emissions.
So all of us have to be part of the solution. We can’t leave anybody out. And I think we have to do it now. I don’t think we can wait, and we’re going to try to make real progress. (Applause.)
Let’s see. Is there an aisle – I can’t see. Is there an aisle back there? I don’t know how we can get to you. Oh, here comes somebody. Okay. (Laughter.)
QUESTION: Hi, Mrs. Clinton. Thank you for being with us today. I’m actually a junior at the high school, the Seoul foreign high school, which is right down yonder. (Laughter.) And —
SECRETARY CLINTON: Down yonder? Is that in Korean terms? (Laughter.)
QUESTION: You spoke a lot about being a woman and how women are a necessity to the world right now. How has – especially being a mother. How has it been dealing with other world leaders who aren’t as accepting of the role of women for example, in different countries who don’t really respect women? How has that been trying to get them to cooperate with you as a female yourself?
SECRETARY CLINTON: Well, I don’t feel like I’ve had any problems either as a senator or in my short tenure as Secretary of State, because I hold an official position and I represent the – in the first case, the United States Senate, or in this case, as the representative of the United States. So there is a funny kind of difference that sometimes goes on in some countries that are not particularly supportive of women in official positions. I think they just kind of ignore the fact that they’re dealing with someone who’s a woman. That seems to be almost a change that goes on in their mind.
So I don’t have any problems with that, but I do believe that it’s important for someone in my position to raise the role of women on an ongoing basis, even in countries where women are not given full and equal rights. So I don’t think it’s enough that people deal with me; I want them to deal with their own women, I want them to think about giving all women the rights to be fully functioning, productive citizens. So that is part of the mission that I feel I carry as the Secretary of State of the United States, and that’s what I intend to promote as I travel around the world talking about a lot of these important matters that are really at the core of the kind of future we’re going to have for ourselves and our children. (Applause.)
QUESTION: (Inaudible) meet you, Madame Secretary. I’m a student of Scranton honors program majoring in (inaudible). I have a very simple question. (Inaudible) student university, I am very curious about your college life at the Wellesley. (Applause.)
SECRETARY CLINTON: Well, I loved Wellesley. I loved going to a women’s college, and I made so many wonderful friends that are still my friends today. I went to Wellesley a long time ago – (laughter) – and at that time, there were a lot of universities in my country where women could not attend as full students, so you couldn’t attend a lot of the Ivy League universities. They didn’t admit women. They had – some of them had separate colleges, like Harvard had Radcliffe, for example.
And so when I was thinking about going to college, going to those universities was not an option. I could not have gone there. But even with that, I’m very glad that I went to a women’s college. I feel like it helped to shape and support me. It gave me opportunities for leadership, and the faculty was very involved in our studies and provided advice about what we were thinking of doing. So it’s just a wonderful experience. And for those of you who have been to Wellesley, it’s a beautiful campus, and so you felt like you were really out of the world for four years. You didn’t have to cope with a lot of the problems that were waiting.
But what was interesting is that for many, many years in the United States, graduates of women’s colleges went to professional schools and into business and into academia at a much higher percentage than women graduates of co-ed universities. Now, I don’t think that is quite the same in our country as it used to be, but that was very significant to me because so many of the women I know today who are leaders in many fields in the United States had a women’s college background. So I’m a very strong believer. And as an alumni of Wellesley, I had the opportunity to speak and discuss whether Wellesley should go co-ed, and I’ve always said no. I think we need women’s colleges like Ewha and Wellesley to provide an alternative for young women and to provide that supportive environment that I certainly found when I went to Wellesley and that I think many of you find here to help prepare you for the future. So I’m very, very proud of Wellesley. (Applause.)
Do you have a microphone? Here, I’ll take one over there. Okay. Oh, too many hands. Too many hands. (Laughter.)
QUESTION: Thank you for your speech, Madame Clinton. Welcome to the Ewha Womans University. Considering the social atmosphere and social pressures, it’s not easy for women to work and take care of their family at the same time. Now, I thought you were quite successful in managing those two different bills. But what do you think should be women’s primary responsibility – her career or her family, or is there any alternative ways to incorporate them together? Thank you. (Applause.)
SECRETARY CLINTON: I think it’s important for each young woman to be true to herself. I have many friends who have made different choices. I have friends who were full-time devoted wives and mothers. I have friends who were full-time professional women and either never married or, if they married, did not have children. But most of my friends, including myself, have balanced marriage, motherhood, and work. And that is the more common pattern in the United States now.
And for some women it is a difficult choice and there is no formula, because it depends so much on your husband – (laughter) – so think hard – (laughter) – about whether you have the same views on these important issues, whether you have an understanding about how to manage your time. Because some young women make a decision to postpone childbearing, some have their children early and then go back to work. I mean, there’s many different ways of making this happen, but it is hard if you don’t have a supportive family. And I think that is one of the keys to helping you make the decision.
But I also believe that society still makes it very hard for women to balance family and work. It’s true in my country, where we don’t have the kind of support for childcare – quality childcare, where we often don’t have flexible work hours, where so many women who work full-time feel like they are not fulfilling either their responsibilities as a mother or their responsibilities as a worker. They’re so torn by it. And it would be – it would make it so much easier if there were more support generally from society and it wasn’t just each person basically on her own.
So I think we have to look for ways to create that support. If it’s not created society-wide, then create it within a network of friends. Looking for ways to support each other is so critical as you start out trying to make this balance.
But I think the other piece of it is that, at the end of the day, you have to live with yourself and nobody else can tell you how you’re going to feel. I know so many – because I just know so many people over the course of my lifetime who have made different choices. And the choice your friend makes may not be the best choice for you. The choice your mother made may not be the best choice for you. So try and be really honest with yourself and how you will feel.
I had to – when I had my daughter and I was working as a lawyer, nobody in this law firm where I worked, because I was the first woman to be there, they – nobody had ever coped with someone who was pregnant and about to have a baby. (Laughter.) Nobody – none of my male partners and other lawyers even wanted to talk about it. (Laughter.) They acted like if they didn’t look at me — (laughter) – it wouldn’t necessarily be happening.
So when I had Chelsea, in those days, we didn’t have anything like maternal leave. Nobody was quite sure what to expect. And the day after I had her, one of the lawyers that I worked with called me up at the hospital and he said, “Well, when are you coming back to work?” (Laughter.) And I said, “Well, I don’t know. I think I’ll take maternal leave.” And he goes, “Well, what’s that?” (Laughter.) And I said, “Well, that means I’m going to stay home for a couple months and take care of my baby.” “Oh,” he said. “Oh, oh, okay.” (Laughter.)
But that shouldn’t be – we should have a policy. There should be an understanding about how to support – the most important work that is done in any society is raising the next generation. There isn’t any more important work. We shouldn’t make it so hard for bright, talented, educated young women to be able to do their work and raise their family. And I hope that those of you who wish to make that choice and balance that have the support you need, both from your immediate family and from the larger society, so that you can do it and do it well. (Applause.)
Well, let me see. Back there. I try to pick the aisles because it’s easier to get to, I guess. Here we go.
QUESTION: Good afternoon, Madame Secretary. Welcome to Ewha and Korea. First of all, thanks for the speech and what you said about doing what you love. So I have a question related to love. (Laughter.) (Inaudible) was one of the major reasons (inaudible) husband (inaudible), then presidential (inaudible). How did you know your husband was (inaudible)? (Laughter and Applause.)
SECRETARY CLINTON: Yeah, I feel more like an advice columnist than Secretary of State today. (Laughter.) How does anybody describe love? I mean, poets have spent millennia writing about love. Psychologists and authors of all sorts write about it. I think if you can describe it, you may not fully be experiencing it because it is such a personal relationship. I’m very lucky because my husband is my best friend and he and I have been together for a very long time, longer than most of you have been alive. (Laughter.)
We are – we have an endless conversation. We never get bored. We get deeply involved in all of the work that we do and we talk about it constantly. And I just feel very fortunate that I have a relationship that has been so meaningful to me over my adult life.
And I just wish all of you to have a positive experience, whatever you choose to pursue in life, because it makes life more interesting. It is something that gives real texture and color, and it’s a learning experience. Let me put it that way. You learn a lot about yourself in a relationship as well as the other person. So it’s no longer Valentine’s Day. That was last week. (Laughter.) But I think that personal relationships are really what is most important in life.
I had a friend, a wonderful woman scientist who was a pioneering woman physician and research endocrinologist. She worked for many years at Georgetown University in Washington, D.C. And she once said something that I’ve always treasured. She said, in talking about her life, near the end of her life, she said, “I’ve loved and been loved, and all the rest is background music.” And so I think about that a lot. So I wish you a lot of music as a foreground. (Applause.)
QUESTION: Madame Secretary, last question.
SECRETARY CLINTON: Oh, the last question. What a burden. (Laughter.) Okay, yes, can you give the microphone to this young woman in pink? Thank you.
QUESTION: Madame Secretary, thank you so much for giving me the last question. The question (inaudible) about your daughter, Chelsea Clinton. Actually, I saw your daughter when I was studying in United States, and I thought she was so smart and great and was so sure about you and your campaign at the time (inaudible) she is so like you. (Laughter.) So I’m pretty sure that you (inaudible) her a lot. So can you just tell a little bit about how special Chelsea is to you?
SECRETARY CLINTON: Well, thank you. Well, we could be here for hours. (Laughter and Applause.) One of the most wonderful things about being a mother is watching your child grow into an adult whom you like and admire. And that’s the way I feel about my daughter. It’s not only that I love her because I’m her mother and I’m very invested in her. I just really like her. I like being with her. I like talking to her. I enjoy hearing about what she’s doing in her life.
And I was very touched when she decided to campaign so vigorously for my election because she’s always been very supportive but very private and not wanting to get out and make public speeches and all of that. But she traveled with me during the campaign and she, I think, had two experiences. One, she realized how much ground there was to cover and how many people there were out there to see and talk to. And I think she also was surprised by what she saw as sort of remnants of gender bias in some of the encounters that we had in the campaign.
She was with me one day in New Hampshire when some young men jumped and unfurled a sign that said, “Iron my shirts” and were yelling at me. She just had never experienced that. She thought that was ancient history, where you read about that in a textbook somewhere. (Laughter.) And she was so surprised, because she’d gone to Stanford, she had gone to Oxford, and she had a very great educational experience and then a really challenging work experience.
So she wanted to help. And she said, look, I’ll go (inaudible) and that’s probably where you saw her out campaigning for me at one of the more than 400 places that she campaigned for me around the country. And I was just so touched that she was willing to do that, because it’s a sacrifice to be the child or the relative of someone in public life, because it’s hard. And you have to avoid taking everything that happens personally. And it’s a difficult experience.
So I just watched her just get better and better and better at what she did and how she communicated. And I’m just very fortunate because we are lucky enough to have a very supportive relationship. She and her dad and I spend a lot of time together, along with her friends. She’s got a great group of friends.
And so for me, it’s the most wonderful part of being a mother because you can see the result of this tiny baby that you were introduced to all those years ago turn into an extraordinary young woman. Because again, nobody gives you a instruction book about being a mother. And I remember one night when Chelsea was like a week or two old and she was just crying and crying and it was the worst feeling when you’re a new mother and you can’t get your baby to stop crying and you don’t know what’s causing it. And you think that it must be something like an emergency, that you should run to the hospital and get help, and all it is is she’s a baby. And so I was rocking her in the middle of the night and I said to her, I said, look, you’ve never been a baby before, and I’ve never been a mother before. (Laughter.) We just have to figure this out together, and that’s what we’re still doing. Every new experience we’re just figuring it out together.
And I just wish for all of you the most joyous and challenging and exciting opportunities ahead. It is a wonderful time to be a young woman in the first part of the 21st century. I know I’m having experiences and opportunities that my mother, who was born before women could vote in the United States, could never have dreamed of, and certainly neither of my grandmothers. And you are living lives that for many of you, your mothers and grandmothers could never have envisioned. So it is an extraordinary opportunity. It is also a responsibility. And I wish for each of you a life filled with purpose and meaning and joy. And thank you for letting me come talk to you today. (Cheers and Applause.)

21diplo01-500 400,http _d.yimg.com_a_p_ap_20090220_capt.7d2ad88f68cd4b73b2baa26863c69ea1.correction_south_korea_clinton_koreas_ljm111 400,http _d.yimg.com_a_p_rids_20090220_i_r4245933023 Hillary Rodham Clinton Hillary Rodham Clinton U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton speaks at the Ewha Womans University in Seoul U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton looks at a student asking her a question, after speech at Ewha Womans University in Seoul U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton speaks at the Ewha Womans University in Seoul

345,http _d.yimg.com_a_p_rids_20090220_i_r3767674407# # #

Read Full Post »

345,http _d.yimg.com_a_p_ap_20090219_capt.2d455d53f3414af69fa0e72594e396c8.south_korea_us_clinton_asia_sel115

Putting the Elements of Smart Power Into Practice

Remarks

Hillary Rodham Clinton
Secretary of State, Secretary of State
En Route Seoul, South Korea
Seoul, South Korea
February 19, 2009

SECRETARY CLINTON: Well, we’re half way through our trip, and I just wanted to give you a sense of what’s next in Korea, and then I think we have time set for tomorrow afternoon to get together to have a conversation as well.
We’ve had kind of a two-day or two-country experience with what I believe are the elements of smart power, if you look at the many tools for doing both diplomacy and development, and for reaching out beyond government-to-government relations to develop a better connection with people in these countries. Because even authoritarian regimes are interested in public opinion, and in democracies at whatever stage of development, obviously, public opinion and people’s attitudes about countries influences the decisions that governments make.
So for me, this is all of a piece. Indonesia was a particularly good example because we did the government-to-government meetings with the Foreign Minister and with the President, as well as the Secretary General of ASEAN. We did the civil society gathering and visited the USAID project and talked with Indonesian journalists in two different settings: the show that’s a combination of The Today Show and MTV; and the reporters at the Ambassador’s residence.
And I really believe that it’s that kind of outreach that we’ve got to do everywhere. Some settings are more susceptible than others, but there’s a real hunger for the United States to be present again. I was so struck when the Secretary General at ASEAN said that he thought that the United States had just been absent. And showing up is not all of life, but it counts for a lot. And especially when you are the most powerful country in the world, if you’re not paying attention, people are going to feel like somehow they’re not important to you.
And so now, in Korea, we’ll be sort of shifting to an emphasis on the security situation. I’ll be starting my morning with General Sharp and his Republic of Korean counterpart to talk about the state of the military in South Korea, the plans for moving operational control, the military assessment of the North Korean actions. I’ll obviously be speaking about that with the President and the Prime Minister and the Foreign Minister, as well as attending another town hall at Ewha University, which is the largest women’s university in the world. And I think we’re in one of their small auditoriums, which has like 2,000 people. But it’s a setting for more dialogue and another kind of town hall question-and-answer opportunity.
I think this is an especially important time for South Korea as they are confronting a lot of worries about what’s up in North Korea, what the succession could be, what it means for them. And they’re looking to us to use our best efforts to try to get the agenda of denuclearization and nonproliferation back in gear. So I’ll be emphasizing that as we meet with the government leaders.
But let me stop there and just kind of throw it open. And Robert’s going to call on people so we don’t leave anybody out.
MR. WOOD: Nick, Arshad, and then Glenn.
SECRETARY CLINTON: Okay. Nick.
QUESTION: Thank you, Madame Secretary. I actually want to thank you for playing along on that convoluted question last night at ASEAN, but I think – I thought it was important to point out that it’s not a Muslim outreach, but it’s the whole world.
So I’d like to ask you on the succession issue that you just mentioned in North Korea. How much can you tell us about U.S. plans or contingency plans? I know it’s a sensitive issue, but – and God knows the North Koreans don’t need another excuse to become even more provocative than they have been in the past weeks. But the people in South Korea, I think, are interested in the matter and would probably want to hear from you on that.
SECRETARY CLINTON: Well, Nick, I think that our efforts have to be to number one, rebuild the commitment on the part of the other members of the Six-Party Talks – Japan, Russia, China, as well as South Korea and ourselves – into a united front to, again, deal with the North Koreans. The Six-Party Talks produced some results which we want to build on, but we are still facing the reality of North Korea not only possessing, we believe, some number of nuclear weapons, but showing very little willingness to get back on track.
And – now, some of that is attributed to their own internal situation, which I will discuss with the South Koreans. But I think our goal is to try to come up with a strategy that is effective in influencing the behavior of the North Koreans at a time when the whole leadership situation is somewhat unclear. So you add to the already difficult challenge of working with the North Koreans, the uncertainties that come from questions about potential succession. This is a difficult undertaking, but we are committed to it and we’re going to be engaged in it, and I’m looking to guidance from both South Korea and then later in China about the best way to proceed.
MR. WOOD: Arshad.
QUESTION: Can you sketch out for us or can you flesh out at all how you think it may be possible to move the North Koreans, and whether, in particular, you’re going to be asking China to exert some of their influence or put more pressure on the North Koreans despite the uncertainty about their leadership?
SECRETARY CLINTON: You know, Arshad, I will better be able to answer that after my meetings in Seoul and Beijing, because I want to hear directly from both the South Koreans and the Chinese about what they think the next steps are.
We obviously have some ideas, but we do want this to be shared responsibility. We take a great deal of responsibility because of our alliance relationships with Japan and with South Korea because of our troops in both countries. But you know, North Korea is on China’s border, and I want to understand better what the Chinese believe is doable. Chris Hill, who is with us, went to Beijing before he joined me in Japan to begin those conversations. So I’ll have a better sense of it after I speak with them.
MR. WOOD: Glenn, and then Mark.
QUESTION: Thank you, Madame Secretary. In terms of getting the Six-Party Talks back on track, are you considering adding discussions about North Korea’s ballistic missile programs, you know, perhaps as, like, another working group as part of the Six-Party Talks? And then also, isn’t China, South Korea and the United States beginning, as part of a trilateral dialogue, a discussion of the potential succession issues in North Korea?
SECRETARY CLINTON: Well, Glenn, I think that the ballistic missile discussion has to be pursued. Whether it’s pursued as part of the Six-Party Talks, as an adjunct, or as a separate track is something I want to work through with our counterparts. But obviously, with the attention being paid to the potential launching by the North Koreans, this is, in and of itself, a matter of great concern. So it is something that’s on my agenda, again, to try to figure out what is the most attractive option for the others as to how to proceed.
There was talk about including the ballistic missile track in the past that didn’t come to pass, and I think that there is a pressing need for us to figure out how we’re going to engage on that. Now that doesn’t mean the North Koreans are going to engage, but we at least have to get our own position in agreement so that we can approach the North Koreans. And the conversations about the North Koreans go on all the time. I mean, everybody is trying to read the tea leaves as to what’s happening and what’s likely to occur.
And there is a lot of guessing going on, but there’s also an increasing amount of pressure because if there is a succession, even if it’s a peaceful succession, that creates more uncertainty and it also may encourage behaviors that are even more provocative as a way to consolidate power within the society. So we will spend a lot of time – I will – trying to determine from the South Koreans and the Chinese what their information is. Because obviously, they have a lot of sources that they can share with us, so we’re going to have to try to feel our way forward here.
MR. WOOD: Mark Landler.
QUESTION: Two questions, a bit unrelated if that’s okay. The first is, since we last spoke to you about the question of highly enriched uranium, there have been these reports in the South Korean news media about a uranium enrichment facility potentially being near Yongbyon, and I wonder whether you could comment, whether you have any sense that there’s anything to these reports. That’s the first question.
The second question is an economic one. We’re flying between two countries that were both badly hurt by the Asian financial crisis. And at the time, the U.S. remedy for them was very much to emulate the U.S. – deregulation, rule of law, and an embrace of the free market. Now, both of these countries, but particularly Korea, are suffering collateral damage from our own economic crisis. So the question is: What message can you give the Koreans this time around? Is it possible this time to say, “You need to emulate us,” or do we need to acknowledge that that may not be the right idea?
SECRETARY CLINTON: Well, Mark, on the highly enriched uranium, we’re always on the lookout for what the North Koreans might be doing, and it is a matter of ongoing concern. But the point that I made the other day, and that I underscore, is we know for sure that they’ve reprocessed plutonium and produced fissile material. That is of grave concern. And there’s been such a concern on the part of some about the highly enriched uranium program that I worry that they’re straining at a gnat and swallowing a camel. I mean, let’s focus on what they’ve done and how much easier it is to reprocess plutonium.
Obviously, we’re concerned, and as we move forward in the Six-Party Talks, if we were ever at the point where we could create a verifiable and complete agreement, it would clearly include highly enriched uranium. And the inspectors and the other means for testing would be charged with determining what, if anything, did exist.
With respect to the economy Korea will be going to the G-20 in London. And I think it’s very important that the G-20 nations come out of that meeting with some agreed upon framework that they intend to pursue. Some countries have a larger load to carry than others, namely the United States, and that’s why President Obama is working so hard to get the stimulus package passed, to get the housing proposal out there, to demonstrate that we’re not just pulling our weight, but leading the way in what we think is the best approach to global recovery.
There may be internal national considerations that any country has to look at. But trying to figure out how to fence off and eliminate toxic assets from your banking system to get credit moving again, to clean up any other kind of overhang, whether it be a housing crisis or other challenge to your economic well-being, individual countries are going to have to do that. But there needs to be a global framework, and that’s what we hope will be hammered out at the G-20. And in this instance, it’s not the United States saying to somebody else, “You go do like we do.” It’s us saying, “Here’s what we’re doing to clean up our own mess.” And we think this is an important moment for us all to act to do what we can.
Now, take Indonesia. We just left there. They’re still projecting a positive growth rate of about 4.5 percent, which is pretty impressive given where the contracting economies in the region are. But they’re worried that failure to act or other problems internationally can cut the legs out from under them and cause them to become much more economically unstable. So I think it’s really important that this G-20 meeting come out with specific action items so that people know what the direction is that we’re going to pursue.
MR. WOOD: One last question. Andrea.
QUESTION: Madame Secretary, following up on Mark, in your visit so far, to what extent have you found that our economic crisis has affected perceptions of American credibility and American leadership? And in the coming months and years, do you feel that you need to address beyond the traditional mechanisms of public diplomacy, which many would argue have really failed in the last – certainly in the last eight years- but you have to come up with new ways of perhaps what you’re doing now in going beyond government -but new ways to assert American leadership and restore respect for America abroad? You know, how damaged are we, and how much anger do you feel out there?
SECRETARY CLINTON: Well, I think that people around the world are bewildered by what is happening. And there is a certain expectation that the United States, with our large, resilient economy, can recover and lead the way for the rest of the world to recover, and that’s why we’re working so hard to turn that expectation into a reality.
Some people are very critical of the problems that we had. The economic crisis hit us first and hit us very hard. But to some extent, we have more resilience than other economies do. P people are still buying treasury bonds, even though they don’t have any return to speak of. And so everyone who’s investing in the American economy may be making the best bet they can on what they think the future holds.
But it’s really important that we do everything within our power to demonstrate that people should have faith and confidence in our decision making. And that’s one of the reasons the President worked so hard to get the stimulus package passed, so that we could begin to get our recovery moving.
So I think right now, people are just more nervous and scared. I just off the phone with Prime Minister Rudd in Australia and he is one of many voices saying we’ve really got to come together around this G-20 Summit and make sure we’ve got a positive program. And I think it’s incumbent upon the United States to do everything we can to lead the way there, and that’s what we’re trying to do.
Indira.
QUESTION: Thank you, Secretary Clinton. On this smart power issue, I was really struck by the appearance on “Awesome” and the civil society dinner and the town hall in Tokyo. And in a lot of these places, you’re being greeted as, you know, they love you, it’s effusive.
I’m wondering to what extent, though, is it preaching to the converted? With these civil society people, with the journalists who went to Emerson, these are people who are already predisposed to be pro-American. So to what extent is your smart power message getting out to those people in Indonesia or in Tokyo, who aren’t in the room and who don’t already love the United States and you personally?
SECRETARY CLINTON: Well, Indira, I think that every one of those events had a much broader audience. Obviously, the Tokyo town hall was on Tokyo television. The program this morning is one of the most popular programs in Indonesia. And so everything that I do, which does connect with people who are receptive has ripple effects. And Andrea said something about public diplomacy. We haven’t done a very good job. And we have such a great story to tell about who we are as Americans and what we believe in and our desire to help other people be empowered.
Some of you walked through that neighborhood with me, I mean the United States aid programs, paid for by American taxpayers, are hooking people up to clean water, for example. And it’s the kind of incremental change that if properly explained and highlighted, can give meaning to what America is to people who may have no opinion or a slightly negative opinion. We are in a struggle over ideas. And one of the points that the civil society people were making to me last night is that Indonesia is going to turn into a real battleground for the future of democracy and Islam and women’s rights. And we need to be there. We need to be supporting the forces within Indonesia who care deeply about all of those values.
And I think our failure to engage on that level going back years, partly because we didn’t realize it was going on right underneath our noses, and then when we did, we didn’t exactly connect with the right messages for people in a way that they accepted. So we’ve got a lot of work to do. I mean, I have no illusions about how high a hill we have to climb here to inspire confidence and respect in people’s minds again.
But I have found that in not only my personal encounters, but in every public research survey I’ve ever read that anybody’s ever done, that people still really want to like America and they want to know what we’re doing and what we stand for.
And take Indonesia; because of the war in Iraq and some other things, the attitude of people in Indonesia toward the United States was very negative. And then the tsunami hit, and we helped. You know, the United States showed up. The Navy showed up with supplies. President Bush sent my husband and his father, and they were visibly there, and then Bill went back time and again. And all of a sudden, people said, “Oh, well, they don’t need to do this, but here they are, they’re helping.” And favorability toward the United States went up.
I mean, in Africa, in some of the sub-Saharan countries, where the favorability toward the United States has remained high, it’s because of President Bush’s PEPFAR program, that “the United States is here to actually do something good for us.” So this to me is what diplomacy is about, because it doesn’t just operate, as I said, government-to-government; it operates people-to-people. And when every single person that I met with said to me they wanted more student exchanges so that Indonesian students could study in the United States, or the President would say, “I studied in the United States, “or the Secretary General of ASEAN said, “I was an AFS student,” – you know, for a lot of people those were transformative events. And we kind of cut back on that and we made it very difficult for people to get visas after 9/11, and so instead of coming to the United States, ambitious students went elsewhere.
So we have to rethink this and try to get back on the track of reaching out and being inclusive and giving more people a chance to see who we are.
QUESTION: Thank you very much. If we could just go back to Pakistan, which you said you didn’t have enough information the other day about the Islamic law in the Swat Valley, and if you’ve gotten more information, if the confusion’s gone, and what you think of that?
And also, Afghanistan. And you say people really want to like America. In Afghanistan, ABC did a poll recently – I know the military has as well – looking at how people feel about Afghanistan now who live there – I mean, about Americans who live there, and their opinions have really plummeted. And one major reason is because the U.S. hasn’t been able to deliver aid or build on its promises. Obviously, security is huge as well. Talk a little bit, if you will, about what you can do differently. The President ordered more troops there yesterday, but it’s not just a military mission. Are you satisfied with the State Department role? What can you do, how can you change it, how can you make the aid there really work? And the Pakistan question.
SECRETARY CLINTON: Well, we’re doing a policy review on Afghanistan and Pakistan, and I’m not going to preview it. But I can guarantee you that we’re looking at every single one of those questions. We did have the President order 17,000 more troops to Afghanistan, but that’s only a part of what the eventual strategy will be. And it is important that we understand how we have to build – rebuild our position and our credibility, and figure out to produce results for people. But we hope to have that review done by the end of March, and we’ll have more to say about it when it is done.
With respect to Pakistan, our Special Representative Richard Holbrooke and others are working with the Government in Pakistan to understand exactly what they intend with their recent announcement and how we’re supposed to interpret it. So I don’t want to say something that might not be particularly useful until we have a clearer idea.
But I’ll just circle back and end with this: Part of the reason we’re having an Afghanistan-Pakistan review – and we’ve worked very hard to get our allies on board and looking at both countries, not just at Afghanistan, which took some discussion – is because we see them as interconnected. And any decision in one affects our prospects and the prospects of peace and stability in the other, so we are very aware of the fact that we have to look at both of them. And we’ve asked that both countries contribute ideas and personnel to our policy review, because we want them to be part of what our eventual strategic assessment is going to be. And they’ve both agreed to do that. So I don’t want to say anything other than that at this moment.
Thank you. Thank you.
QUESTION: Is there any way to get one in on North Korea (inaudible)? Basically, are you going with any idea of defusing the tensions that exist right now? Is that important to (inaudible)?
SECRETARY CLINTON: Well, you know, defusing the tension between North and South Korea is always important, because we don’t want it to spiral up. So I will talk with the South Koreans about how we can try to rein in the unhelpful comments from the North Koreans, or at least not respond to them, not take the bait, so to speak.
But this is a pattern. You can go back and chart it. And we’re in one of those periods where there’s a lot of threatening talk coming from the North, and we just have to take it for what it is and try to figure out how we’re going to organize ourselves to deal with them going forward.

Okay. Thanks, everybody.
# # #

Read Full Post »

« Newer Posts

%d bloggers like this: